DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Hydrolysis from In Vitro Digestion Using Symmetric and Asymmetric Triacylglycerol Compounds by Enzymatic Interesterification

효소적으로 합성된 대칭형과 비대칭형 Triacylglycerol 혼합물의 In Vitro Digestion에서의 소화율 비교

  • Woo, Jeong Min (Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Ki Teak (Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2014.02.07
  • Accepted : 2014.04.11
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

For developing indigestible lipids, symmetric triacylglycerol (ST) and asymmetric triacylglycerol (AT) were produced by enzymatic interesterification using high oleic sunflower oil, palmitic ethyl ester, and stearic ethyl ester in a shaking water bath. Used enzymes were Lipozyme RMIM for ST and Lipozyme TLIM for AT. To remove ethyl ester from reactants, methanol fractionation (reactant : methanol=1:5, w/v, $25^{\circ}C$) and florisil separation (reactant : florisil=1:8, w/w) were applied. Acetone fractionation (reactant : acetone=1:9, w/v) was implemented to separate triacylglcerol (TAG) species into ST and AT. Fractions I (before fractionation), II (after fractionation, liquid phase) and III (after fractionation, solid phase) were separated from ST, whereas fractions IV (after 1st fractionation, liquid phase) and V (after 2nd fractionation, solid phase) were from AT. From sn-2 fatty acid composition analysis, the sum of palmitic acid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0) was 4.9~6.5 area% in ST (I, II, III), and 41.9~43.9 area% in AT (IV, V). In vitro digestion was performed for 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes at $37^{\circ}C$ in a shaking water bath. For the digestion results, hydrolysis of V was only 40% compared to others (I, II, III, IV) at 120 minutes due to its melting point ($49^{\circ}C$). However, initially (15 minutes), hydrolysis (%) was as follows: V$32.5^{\circ}C$, $31.8^{\circ}C$) and different slip melting points ($31.3^{\circ}C$, $19.5^{\circ}C$). Even though IV has a lower TAG content composed of two saturated fatty acids than III, it had a similar melting point.

본 연구는 고올레산 해바라기유(high oleic sunflower oil, HOSO), palmitic ethyl ester 및 stearic ethyl ester를 이용하여 대칭형 유지와 비대칭형 유지를 합성하였으며, 이를 이용하여 in vitro digestion에서의 소화율(%)을 비교하고자 하였다. 생성된 대칭형 유지와 비대칭형 유지는 acetone을 이용하여 분별함으로써 대칭형 유지는 I, II, III으로, 비대칭형 유지는 IV, V로 분별되었다. 그 후 분별물들을 이용하여 in vitro digestion을 진행함으로써 소화율(%)과 농도변화량(mg/mL/min)을 비교하였으며, 분별물들의 위치별 지방산 및 TAG 조성 분석, DSC를 통한 흡열 및 발열곡선 분석, solid fat index와 융점 측정을 통해 특성을 알아보고자 하였다. 위치별 지방산 조성 분석 결과 I, II, III은 sn-2 위치에 palmitic acid와 stearic acid의 합이 4.9~6.5 area%로 나타나 주로 대칭형 TAG로 이루어졌고, IV와 V는 41.9~43.9 area%로 나타나 주로 비대칭형 TAG로 구성되어 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 한편 in vitro digestion을 진행하여 분별물간의 가수분해율(%)을 비교한 결과, 반응시간 120분에서는 V만 다른 분별물에 비해 약 40% 정도 소화가 되지 않았으며, V의 융점이 $49^{\circ}C$로 반응온도($37^{\circ}C$)보다 높았다. 초기 반응시간(15분)에서는 I,II>IV>III>V 순으로 소화가 되지 않았으며, 각 분별물에서 ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$와 POS/PSO의 가수분해율(%)을 비교해 본 결과 TAG 간의 가수분해율 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 III과 IV를 비교해 보았을 때, IV가 III에 비해 두 개의 포화지방산으로 구성된 TAG 함량이 약 40 area% 적지만 complete melting point가 III과 유사한 것으로 나타나 비대칭형 TAG가 대칭형 TAG에 비해 융점이 높다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 slip melting point가 in vitro digestion 결과에 가장 큰 영향을 미치며, 융점은 총지방산 조성에서의 포화지방산 함량이 높을수록, 두 개의 포화지방산으로 구성된 TAG의 함량이 높을수록, 비대칭형 TAG로 이루어질수록 높아짐을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Poulain JP. 2002. The contemporary diet in France: "destructuration" or from commensalism to "vagabond feeding". Appetite 39: 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0461
  2. Anderson AS, Macintyre S, West P. 1993. Adolescent meal patterns: grazing habits in the west of Scotland. Health Bull 51: 158-165.
  3. Kim K, Park E. 2005. Nutrient density of fast-food consumed by the middle school students in Cheongju city. Korean J Community Nutr 10: 271-280.
  4. Akoh CC. 2002. Food Lipids. 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, USA. p 713-745.
  5. Moon HN, Hong SJ, Suh SJ. 1992. The prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents. Korean J Nutr 25: 413-418.
  6. Ahn HS, Park JK, Lee DH, Paik IK, Lee JH, Lee YJ. 1994. Clinical and nutritional examination in obese children and adolescents. Korean J Nutr 27: 79-89.
  7. Arishima T, Tachibana N, Kojima M, Takamatsu K, Imaizumi K. 2009. Screening of resistant triacylglycerols to the pancreatic lipase and their potentialities as a digestive retardant. J Food Lipids 16: 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4522.2009.01133.x
  8. Lee KT, Akoh CC. 1998. Structure lipids: synthesis and applications. Food Rev Int 14: 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129809541148
  9. Lee KT, Foglia TA, Lee JH. 2005. Low-calorie fat substitutes: synthesis and analysis. In Handbook of Industrial Biocatalysis. Hou CT, ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. Vol 16, p 1-19.
  10. Moon JH, Lee JH, Shin JA, Hong ST, Lee KT. 2011. Optimization of lipase-catalyzed production of structured lipids from canola oil containing similar composition of triacylglycerols to cocoa butter. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 40: 1490-1437. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.10.1430
  11. Lee YJ, Lee KT. 2009. Development and characterization of trans free margarine stock from lipase-catalyzed interesterification of avocado and palm oils. Korean J Food Sci Technol 41: 231-237.
  12. Son JM, Lee JH, Xue CL, Hong ST, Lee KT. 2011. Optimization of lipase-catalyzed interestererification for production of human milk fat substitutes by response surface methodology. Korean J Food Sci Technol 43: 689-695. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2011.43.6.689
  13. Xu X, Skands ARH, Hoy CE, Mu H, Balchen S, Nissen JA. 1998. Production of specific-structured lipids by enzymatic interesterification: Elucidation of acyl migration by response surface design. J Am Oil Chem Soc 75: 1179-1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-998-0309-z
  14. Mu H, Hoy CE. 2004. The digestion of dietary triacylglycerols. Prog Lipid Res 43: 105-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(03)00050-X
  15. Griffin BA. 2013. Lipid metabolism. Surgery 31: 267-272.
  16. Versantvoort CHM, Oomen AG, Kamp EVD, Rompelberg CJM, Sips AJAM. 2005. Applicability of an in vitro digestion model in assessing the bioaccessibility of mycotoxins from food. Food Chem Toxicol 43: 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.08.007
  17. Mun S, Decker EA, Park Y, Weiss J, McClements DJ. 2006. Influence of interfacial composition on in vitro digestibility of emulsified lipids: potential mechanism for chitosan's ability to inhibit fat digestion. Food Biophysics 1: 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-005-9001-0
  18. Cai S, Wang O, Wang M, He J, Wang Y, Zhang D, Zhou F, Ji B. 2012. In vitro inhibitory effect on pancreatic lipase activity of subfractions from ethanol extracts of fermented oats (Avena sativa L.) and synergistic effect of three phenolic acids. J Agric Food Chem 60: 7245-7251. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf3009958
  19. Pafumi Y, Lairon D, de la Porte PL, Juhel C, Storch J, Hamosh M, Armand M. 2002. Mechanisms of inhibition of triacylglycerol hydrolysis by human gastric lipase. J Biol Chem 277: 28070-28079. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202839200
  20. Oomen AG, Rompelberg CJM, Bruil MA, Dobbe CJG, Pereboom DPKH, Sips AJAM. 2003. Development of an in vitro digestion model for estimating the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:281-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-002-1278-0
  21. Nakai M, Fukui Y, Asami S, Toyoda-Ono Y, Iwashita T, Shibata H, Mitsunaga T, Hashimoto F, Kiso Y. 2005. Inhibitory effect of oolong tea polyphenols on pancreatic lipase in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 53: 4593-4598. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf047814+
  22. Ronne TH, Yang T, Mu H, Jacobsen C, Xu X. 2005. Enzymatic interesterification of butterfat with rapeseed oil in a continuous packed bed reactor. J Agric Food Chem 53:5617-5624. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf050646g
  23. Lee KT, Foglia TA. 2000. Fractionation of chicken fat triacylglycerols: synthesis of structured lipids with immobilized lipases. J Food Sci 65: 826-831. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb13595.x
  24. Christie WW. 1982. Lipid analysis: isolation, separation, identification, and structural analysis of lipids. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. p 96-98.
  25. Hyeon JW, Shin JA, Lee KT. 2013. Fatty acid composition and triacylglycerol species of the domestic and foreign chocolates collected from the market. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2013.40.1.035
  26. Lee KT, Foglia TA. 2001. Fractionation of menhaden oil and partially hydrogenated menhaden oil: characterization of triacylglycerol fractions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 78: 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-001-0260-9
  27. Lee KT, Akoh CC. 1996. Immobilized lipase-catalyzed production of structured lipids with eicosapentaenoic acid at specific positions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 73: 611-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518116
  28. AOCS. 1990. Official Method and Recommended Practices. 4th ed. American Oil Chemists' Society, Champaign, IL, USA. Cc 1-25.
  29. Kim JY, Lee KT. 2014. Enzymatic interesterification and melting characteristic for asymmetric 1,2-distearoyl-3-oleoylrac- glycerol triacylglycerol enriched product. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 43: 93-101. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.1.093
  30. Hyeon JW, Lee KT. 2013. Enzymatic synthesis of asymmetric structured lipids containing 1,2-disaturated-3-unsaturated glycerol using acyl migration. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 367-375. https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2013.40.4.367
  31. Arishima T, Tachibana N, Kojima M, Takamatsu K, Imaizumi K. 2009. Screening of resistant triacylglycerols to the pancreatic lipase and their potentialities as a digestive retardant. J Food Lipids 16: 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4522.2009.01133.x
  32. Arishima T, Sagi N, Mori H, Sato K. 1991. Polymorphism of POS. 1. Occurrence and polymorphic transformation. J Am Oil Chem Soc 68: 710-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662157

Cited by

  1. In Vitro and In Vivo Digestibility of Soybean, Fish, and Microalgal Oils, and Their Influences on Fatty Acid Distribution in Tissue Lipid of Mice vol.25, pp.22, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225357
  2. Regiospecific Positioning of Palmitic Acid in Triacylglycerol Structure of Enzymatically Modified Lipids Affects Physicochemical and In Vitro Digestion Properties vol.26, pp.13, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26134015