한국수학사학회지 (Journal for History of Mathematics)

한국수학사학회 (The Korean Society for History of Mathematics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

몬티홀 딜레마에 대한 학생들의 이해와 수업적용

Students' Understanding and Application of Monty Hall Dilemma in Classroom

  • 투고 : 2014.04.08
  • 심사 : 2014.05.24
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Although Monty Hall dilemma is used in many areas including philosophy, economics, and psychology, it is used in the current mathematics textbooks only as a material for reading or one of probability questions. The present study tries to explore students' understanding of Monty Hall dilemma through a class case. In this study, a group of high-school students participated in group activities, in which they read an argument about Monty Hall dilemma, and tried to resolve it through small-group and whole-class discussions, and then studied the conditional probability. The analysis supports the studies in psychology that intuitive understandings on probability do not change easily, and that counter-intuitivity in Monty Hall dilemma induces confusion and offers a basis for discussions among students. Similar results are anticipated when other dilemmas on probability are used.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. Bailey, Monty Hall uses a mixed strategy, Mathematics Magazine 73(2) (2000), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.2307/2691085
  2. Cho C. M, Park J. Y., Kang S. J., A Study on Geometrical Probability Instruction through Analysis of Bertrand's Paradox, School Mathematics 10(2) (2008), 181-197. 조차미, 박종률, 강순자, Bertrand's paradox의 분석을 통한 기하학적 확률에 관한 연구, 대한수학교육학회지<학교수학> 10(2) (2008), 181-197.
  3. E. Fischbein, The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children, Reidel, Holanda, 1975.
  4. D. Friedman, Monty Hall's three doors: construction and deconstruction of a choice anomaly, American Economic Review 88 (1998), 933-946.
  5. R. D. Gill, The Monty Hall problem is not a probability puzzle, Statistica Neerlandica 65(1) (2011), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2010.00474.x
  6. P. Gorroochurn, Classic problems of probability, New Jersey: Wiley, 2012.
  7. D. Granberg, T. Brown, (1995). The Monty Hall dilemma, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(7) (1995), 711-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295217006
  8. D. Granberg, N. Dorr, Further exploration of two-stage decision making in the Monty Hall dilemma, American Journal of Psychology 111(4) (1998), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423551
  9. Kim W. K. et al, Probability and Statistics, Seoul : Visang Education, 2014. 김원경 외, 확률과 통계, 서울 : 비상교육, 2014.
  10. Lee J. H., Historic Paradoxes of Probability and Statistics Usable in School Mathematics, The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics 24(4) (2011), 119-141. 이종학, 학교 수학에 활용 가능한 확률.통계 영역에서의 역사적 패러독스, 한국수학사학회지 24(4) (2011), 119-141.
  11. Lee J. Y., Lee K. H., A Case Study of Creativity Development Using Simpson's Paradox for Mathematically Gifted Students, The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 20(3) (2010), 203-219. 이정연, 이경화, Simpson의 패러독스를 활용한 영재교육에서 창의성 발현사례 분석, 대한수학교육학회지 <수학교육학연구> 20(3) (2010), 203-219.
  12. Lee K. H., Study on the Didactic Transposition of the Concept of Probability, Unpublished doctoral dissertation of Seoul University, 1996. 이경화, 확률개념의 교수학적 변환에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 박사학위 논문, 1996.
  13. S. Lucas, J. Rosenhouse, A. Schepler, The Monty Hall problem, reconsidered, Mathematics Magazine 82(5) (2009), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.4169/002557009X478355
  14. J. P. Morgan, N. R. Chaganty, R. C. Dahiya, M. J. Doviak, Let's make a deal: The player's dilemma, The American Statistician 45(4) (1991), 284-287.
  15. A. Morone, A. Fiore, Monty Hall's Three Doors for Dummies, Theory and Decision Library Series 42 (2008), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68437-4_10
  16. J. Rosenhouse, The Monty Hall problem, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  17. T. Slembeck, J. R. Tyran, Do institutions promote rationality? An experimental study of the three doors anomaly, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 54 (2004), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.03.002
  18. J. Sprenger, Probability, rational single-case decisions and the Monty Hall problem, Synthese 174 (2010), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9455-y
  19. Song H. S., On the two Envelope-Paradox, Logic Research 6(1) (2003), 1-18. 송하석, 두 봉투의 역설에 대하여, 논리연구 6(1) (2003), 1-18.
  20. Whang S. W. et al, Probability and Statistics, Seoul : Sinsago, 2014. 황선욱 외, 확률과 통계, 서울 : 신사고, 2014.