Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Regional Analysis of Soft Tissue Thickness on Korean Buttocks and Application to Fasciocutaneous Flap Design

  • Kim, Do Yup (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Hyun Nam (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jin Hyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sin Rak (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun (Department of Anatomy, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Yea Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.06.14
  • Accepted : 2013.08.15
  • Published : 2014.03.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Various shapes and designs of the gluteal artery perforator flap have been used for treating sacral pressure sores and reconstructing breasts. To establish the ideal fasciocutaneous flap design for use in the gluteal area, the soft tissue thickness distribution was measured. Methods Twenty-one buttocks of adult Korean cadavers were analyzed through rectangular subfascial dissection. Each buttock was divided horizontally into 10 sections and vertically into 10 sections, and then, the thickness at the corners of the sections was measured. For the sake of comparison and statistical verification with living bodies, computed tomography (CT) images of 120 buttocks of patients were randomly selected. Five horizontal sections and 4 vertical sections were made, and the thickness at each corner was recorded. Results According to the dissection and the CT images, the area with the thinnest soft tissues in the buttock was around the posterior superior iliac spine, close to the sacral area. The thickest area was the superolateral area of the buttock, which was 3.24 times and 2.15 times thicker than the thinnest area in the studies on cadaver anatomy and the CT images, respectively. Conclusions The thickness of the soft tissues in the buttocks differed by area. The superolateral area had the thickest soft tissues, and the superomedial area had the thinnest. This study includes information on the distribution of the thickness of the gluteal soft tissues of Koreans. The outcome of this study may contribute to the design of effective local flaps for pressure sore reconstruction and free flaps for breast reconstruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Kroll SS, Rosenfield L. Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:561-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198804000-00012
  2. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, et al. The gluteal perforator- based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:678-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199304000-00017
  3. Verpaele AM, Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K, et al. The superior gluteal artery perforator flap: an additional tool in the treatment of sacral pressure sores. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52: 385-91. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3101
  4. Higgins JP, Orlando GS, Blondeel PN. Ischial pressure sore reconstruction using an inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap. Br J Plast Surg 2002;55:83-5. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2001.3713
  5. Fujino T, Harasina T, Aoyagi F. Reconstruction for aplasia of the breast and pectoral region by microvascular transfer of a free flap from the buttock. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;56:178-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197508000-00010
  6. Roche NA, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel PN, et al. The use of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:7-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200045010-00002
  7. Borman H, Maral T. The gluteal fasciocutaneous rotationadvancement flap with V-Y closure in the management of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2325-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200206000-00025
  8. Teo TC. The propeller flap concept. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37:615-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2010.06.003
  9. Blondeel PN. The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:185-93. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.3032
  10. Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, et al. Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:118-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000095437.43805.d1
  11. Kronowitz SJ. Redesigned gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:728-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000299296.32924.d7
  12. Allen RJ, Levine JL, Granzow JW. The in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:333-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000227665.56703.a8
  13. Kankaya Y, Ulusoy MG, Oruc M, et al. Perforating arteries of the gluteal region: anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56:409-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000200775.56263.2d
  14. Song WC, Bae SM, Han SH, et al. Anatomical and radiological study of the superior and inferior gluteal arteries in the gluteus maximus muscle for musculocutaneous flap in Koreans. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:935-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.028
  15. Rozen WM, Ting JW, Grinsell D, et al. Superior and inferior gluteal artery perforators: in-vivo anatomical study and planning for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:217-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.029
  16. Chan VO, Colville J, Persaud T, et al. Intramuscular injections into the buttocks: are they truly intramuscular? Eur J Radiol 2006;58:480-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.01.008
  17. Burbridge BE. Computed tomographic measurement of gluteal subcutaneous fat thickness in reference to failure of gluteal intramuscular injections. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007; 58:72-5.
  18. Ludescher B, Rommel M, Willmer T, et al. Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in adults-correlation with BMI and recommendations for pen needle lengths for subcutaneous self-injection. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;75:786-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04132.x
  19. Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95: 1207-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199506000-00010
  20. Dugas LR, Cao G, Luke AH, et al. Adiposity is not equal in a multi-race/ethnic adolescent population: NHANES 1999- 2004. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:2099-101. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.52
  21. Meyer KA, Friend S, Hannan PJ, et al. Ethnic variation in body composition assessment in a sample of adolescent girls. Int J Pediatr Obes 2011;6:481-90. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2011.596841
  22. Kaur M, Talwar I. Body composition and fat distribution among older Jat females: a rural-urban comparison. Homo 2011;62:374-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2010.05.004
  23. Ujcic-Voortman JK, Bos G, Baan CA, et al. Obesity and body fat distribution: ethnic differences and the role of socio-economic status. Obes Facts 2011;4:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000324555

Cited by

  1. Radiological anatomy of the perforators of the gluteal region: The “radiosome” based anatomy vol.38, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30214
  2. Analysis of gluteal subcutaneous and muscle thickness in infants and children for application to intramuscular injection, autologous fat grafting, and gluteal artery perforator flaps vol.45, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01760