Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation

  • Park, Young-Seok (Department of Oral Anatomy, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Seung-Hee (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Hee-Jung (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sophia (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Il (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Kyu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2013.10.12
  • Accepted : 2013.11.08
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation methods with and without primary wound closure and the relationship between histometric and micro-computed tomographic (CT) data. Materials and Methods: Porcine hydroxyapatite with polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was implanted into a canine extraction socket. The density of the total mineralized tissue, remaining hydroxyapatite, and new bone was analyzed by histometry and micro-CT. The statistical association between these methods was evaluated. Results: Histometry and micro-CT showed that the group which underwent alveolar preservation without primary wound closure had significantly higher new bone density than the group with primary wound closure (P<0.05). However, there was no significant association between the data from histometry and micro-CT analysis. Conclusion: These results suggest that alveolar ridge preservation without primary wound closure enhanced new bone formation more effectively than that with primary wound closure. Further investigation is needed with respect to the comparison of histometry and micro-CT analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 469-77.
  2. Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes. Periodontol 2000 2003; 33: 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03304.x
  3. Kim DM, Nevins M, Camelo M, Schupbach P, Kim SW, Camelo JM, et al. The feasibility of demineralized bone matrix and cancellous bone chips in conjunction with an extracellular matrix membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 39-47.
  4. Kim JE, Shin JM, Oh SO, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, et al. The three-dimensional microstructure of trabecular bone: analysis of site-specific variation in the human jaw bone. Imaging Sci Dent 2013; 43: 227-33. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.227
  5. Chappard D, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Legrand E, Basle MF, Audran M. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 1177-84. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.050205
  6. Fajardo RJ, Ryan TM, Kappelman J. Assessing the accuracy of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography of primate trabecular bone by comparisons with histological sections. Am J Phys Anthropol 2002; 118: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10086
  7. Muller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, Van Der Perre G, Dequeker J, Hildebrand T, et al. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 1998; 23: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00068-4
  8. Kim DM, De Angelis N, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Nevins M. Ridge preservation with and without primary wound closure: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013; 33: 71-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1463
  9. Dalle Carbonare L, Valenti MT, Bertoldo F, Zanatta M, Zenari S, Realdi G, et al. Bone microarchitecture evaluated by histomorphometry. Micron 2005; 36: 609-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.007
  10. Gielkens PF, Schortinghuis J, de Jong JR, Huysmans MC, Leeuwen MB, Raghoebar GM, et al. A comparison of micro- CT, microradiography and histomorphometry in bone research. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 558-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.11.011
  11. Gonzalez-Garcia R, Monje F. Is micro-computed tomography reliable to determine the microstructure of the maxillary alveolar bone? Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 730-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02478.x
  12. Kim YS, Kim SH, Kim KH, Jhin MJ, Kim WK, Lee YK, et al. Rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation model with simultaneous implant placement: differential responses to the graft materials. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2012; 42: 204-11. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.204
  13. Lindhe J, Cecchinato D, Donati M, Tomasi C, Liljenberg B. Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res (in press).
  14. Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Muramatsu H, Endo N, Takahashi HE, Hara T. A morphometric comparison of trabecular structure of human ilium between microcomputed tomography and conventional histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 61: 493-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900373
  15. Muller R, Hahn M, Vogel M, Delling G, Ruegsegger P. Morphometric analysis of noninvasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of high-resolution computed tomography and histologic sections. Bone 1996; 18: 215-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)00489-0
  16. Engelke K, Graeff W, Meiss L, Hahn M, Delling G. High spatial resolution imaging of bone mineral using computed microtomography. Comparison with microradiography and undecalcified histologic sections. Invest Radiol 1993; 28: 341-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199304000-00016
  17. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1015-23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.1015
  18. Skoglund A, Hising P, Young C. A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12: 194-9.
  19. Vance GS, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Johnston H, Scheetz JP. Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: a clinical and histologic study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 491-7.
  20. Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 1: histologic results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 361-9.
  21. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Schupbach P. Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the monkey. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 323-31. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080411.x
  22. von Arx T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Buser D. Evaluation of a prototype trilayer membrane (PTLM) for lateral ridge augmentation: an experimental study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 190-9. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2001.0205
  23. Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x
  24. Zubillaga G, Von Hagen S, Simon BI, Deasy MJ. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following post-extraction ridge augmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralized freeze-dried bone osteoinductive graft. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 965-75. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.965

Cited by

  1. Assessment of the Impact of Zoledronic Acid on Ovariectomized Osteoporosis Model Using Micro-CT Scanning vol.10, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132104
  2. Comparative evaluation of a biomimic collagen/hydroxyapatite/β-tricaleium phosphate scaffold in alveolar ridge preservation with Bio-Oss Collagen vol.10, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-016-0333-0
  3. Test in canine extraction site preservations by using mineralized collagen plug with or without membrane vol.30, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328215625429
  4. Depleted lamin B1: a possible marker of the involvement of senescence in endometriosis? vol.297, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4691-y
  5. Section Plane Effects on Morphometric Values of Microcomputed Tomography vol.2019, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7905404
  6. Positive Effects of Qing’e Pill (青娥丸) on Trabecular Microarchitecture and its Mechanical Properties in Osteopenic Ovariectomised Mice vol.25, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-016-2604-0