DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clival lesion incidentally discovered on cone-beam computed tomography: A case report and review of the literature

  • Jadhav, Aniket B. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Tadinada, Aditya (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Rengasamy, Kandasamy (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Fellows, Douglas (Division of Diagnostic Sciences and Therapeutics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine) ;
  • Lurie, Alan G. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.07.08
  • Accepted : 2013.12.15
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

An osteolytic lesion with a small central area of mineralization and sclerotic borders was discovered incidentally in the clivus on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of a 27-year-old male patient. This benign appearance indicated a primary differential diagnosis of non-aggressive lesions such as fibro-osseous lesions and arrested pneumatization. Further, on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion showed a homogenously low T1 signal intensity with mild internal enhancement after post-gadolinium and a heterogeneous T2 signal intensity. These signal characteristics might be attributed to the fibrous tissues, chondroid matrix, calcific material, or cystic component of the lesion; thus, chondroblastoma and chondromyxoid fibroma were added to the differential diagnosis. Although this report was limited by the lack of final diagnosis and the patient lost to follow-up, the incidental skull base finding would be important for interpreting the entire volume of CBCT by a qualified oral and maxillofacial radiologist.

Keywords

References

  1. Alhadidi A, Cevidanes LH, Paniagua B, Cook R, Festy F, Tyndall D. 3D quantification of mandibular asymmetry using the SPHARM-PDM tool box. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2012; 7: 265-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0665-2
  2. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67; 2080-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.007
  3. Price JB, Thaw KL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Padilla RJ. Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1261-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02299.x
  4. Laine FJ, Nadel L, Braun IF. CT and MR imaging of the central skull base. Part 1: Techniques, embryologic development, and anatomy. Radiographics 1990; 10: 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.10.4.2198631
  5. Chaljub G, Van Fleet R, Guinto FC Jr, Crow WN, Martinez L, Kumar R. MR imaging of clival and paraclival lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 1069-74. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.159.5.1414777
  6. Welker KM, DeLone DR, Lane JI, Gilbertson JR. Arrested pneumatization of the skull base: imaging characteristic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 1691-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3131
  7. Bloch OG, Jian BJ, Yang I, Han SJ, Aranda D, Ahn BJ, et al. Cranial chondrosarcoma and recurrence. Skull Base 2010; 20: 149-56. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1246218
  8. Borges A. Skull base tumours: Part II. Central skull base tumours and intrinsic tumours of the bony skull base. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66: 348-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.018
  9. Douis H, Saifuddin A. The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. II. Chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42: 611-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1521-3
  10. Géhanne C, Delpierre I, Damry N, Devroede B, Brihaye P, Christophe C. Skull base chordoma: CT and MRI features. JBR-BTR 2005; 88: 325-7.
  11. Wein RO, Popat SR, Doerr TD, Dutcher PO. Plasma cell tumors of the skull base: four case reports and literature review. Skull Base 2002; 12: 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-31570-1
  12. Borges A. Imaging of the central skull base. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2009; 19: 669-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2009.11.001
  13. Ben Salem D, Allaoui M, Dumousset E, Ponnelle T, Justrabo E, Martin D, et al. Chondroblastoma of the temporal bone associated with a persistent hypoglossal artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144: 1315-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-002-1025-3
  14. Hatano M, De Donato G, Falcioni M, Sanna M. Chondroblastoma of the temporal bone. Acta Otolaryngol 2011; 131: 890-5. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2011.566579
  15. Dran G, Niesar E, Vandenbos F, Noel G, Paquis P, Lonjon M. Chondroblastoma of the apex portion of petrousal bone. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23: 231-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0201-9
  16. Weber AL. Imaging of the skull base. Eur J Radiol 1996; 22: 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0720-048X(96)00738-3
  17. Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 2012; 57 Suppl 1: 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x
  18. Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, Mayo-Smith WW, Megibow AJ, Yee J, et al. Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: 754-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

Cited by

  1. Imaging features of chondromyxoid fibroma: report of 15 cases and literature review vol.89, pp.1064, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160088