DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preferences Factors Analysis for Car-sharing

카쉐어링의 선호 요인 분석연구

  • 김숙희 (수원시정연구원) ;
  • 이규진 (아주대학교 TOD기반의 지속가능한 도시교통 연구센터) ;
  • 최기주 (아주대학교)
  • Received : 2013.09.02
  • Accepted : 2014.05.22
  • Published : 2014.08.01

Abstract

This study presents preferences factors analysis of Car-sharing in Suwon. Approximately, 60% of the citizens prefer car-sharing and consider using it. The results of analysis by factors show higher preferences in these groups of travelers: man, younger, a resident of detached house and efficiency apartment, user of public transportation who finds it uncomfortable, traveler without vehicles, and traveler using car 1 to 3 times a week. The potential demand for car-sharing was highest in the residential areas and around the stations. Travelers prefer to pay the fee by the hour, which the fair value was 7,967 won. For the trip purpose of business, shopping and leisures, car-sharing is more preferred than taxi and rental cars. Findings will contribute to determining the direction of policy for the car-sharing.

본 연구는 수원 시민들을 대상으로 카쉐어링 선호도 요인을 분석하여 제시하였다. 시민의 약 60% 정도가 카쉐어링 이용을 고려하고 있으며, 남자가 여자보다, 젊은 층이 장년층보다, 단독주택과 오피스텔이 아파트와 연립주택보다, 대중교통 이용이 불편한 시민이, 차량 미소유자가, 자동차를 일주일 1~3회 이용하는 통행자들의 카쉐어링 선호도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 특히 주거 밀집지역과 대중교통 역 주변에서의 카쉐어링 잠재수요가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 요금체계는 시간당 지불방식을 가장 선호하였으며, 시간당 7,967원의 지불용의가 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 통행목적에서는 업무 쇼핑 여가 레저 통행에서 카쉐어링 선호도가 택시 및 렌터카보다 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구결과는 카쉐어링 사업 시행의 정책방향 결정에 기여하며, 카쉐어링의 활성화에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cervero, R. (2003). "City car-share first-year travel demand impacts."Transportation Research Record 1839, No. 03-2181.
  2. David, K. G. and Cathy, H. X. (2010). "Fleet-sizing and service availability for a vehicle rental system via closed queueing networks." European Journal of Operational Research.
  3. Fedorcakova, M. Sebo, Juraj, Petrikova, A. (2012). "Innovative application of inventory theory for determining optimal fleet size for a car-sharing system."IEEE 10th Jubilee International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics, Semi-Proceedings.
  4. Fellows, N. T. and Pitfield, D. E. (2000). "An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing."Transportation Research Part D, No. 5.
  5. Hwang, G. Y. (2012). "New transportation means of car-sharing smart era."Urban Problems, Vol. 47, No. 519 (in Korean).
  6. Lee, J. Y., Choi, K. C. and Chung, W. H. (2007). "Car-sharing in overseas and introduction to Korea."Proceedings of the 57th KOR-KST Conference (in Korean).
  7. Litman, T. (2000). "Evaluating car-sharing benefits."Transportation Research Record, No. 1702.
  8. Special Issues (2012). "The estimation of car-sharing use demand." Urban Issues, Vol. 47, No. 519 (in Korean).

Cited by

  1. The Impact of Public Transit Accessibility on the Car-sharing Use Demand vol.15, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2016.15.4.001
  2. Utilizing Spatial Big Data platform in evaluating correlations between rental housing car sharing and public transportation vol.25, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0122-6
  3. A Study on Optimizing Depot Location in Carsharing Considering the Neighborhood Environmental Factors vol.16, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2017.16.5.49
  4. Preference of Elderly for Ride Hailing Services vol.20, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2018.20.6.191