Abstract
Purpose : In case of the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using Tomotherapy and linear accelerator (Linac), it was to compare and to evaluate the imaging dose of MVCT and CBCT that were performed daily for the correct set up of the patient. Materials and Methods : The human body model Phantom (Anderson rando Phantom, USA) was divided into the three parts as Head, Thorax, pelvis, and after GafChromic EBT3 film cut to the size of $0.5{\times}0.5cm2$.in the center of the recording area were situated on the ant, post, left, and right surface of the phantom and 2cm in depth from the ant, post, left, right, and center surface of the phantom, the surface dose and inner dose were measured repeatedly three times, respectively, using the tomotherapy (Hi Art) and the OBI of NovalisTx. The measured film calculated the output value by RIP version6.0 and then the average value of the dose was calculated by the one-way analysis of variance. Results : Using the human body model phantom, the results of MVCT and CBCT performance were that measurements of MVCT inner dose were showed $15.43cGy{\pm}6.05$ in the head, $16.62cGy{\pm}3.08$ in the thorax, $16.81cGy{\pm}5.24$ in the pelvis, and measurements of CBCT inner dose were showed $13.28{\pm}3.68$ in the head, from $13.66{\pm}4.04$ in the thorax, $15.52{\pm}3.52$ in the pelvis. The measurements of surface dose were showed in case of MVCT performance, $11.64{\pm}4.05$ in the head, $12.16{\pm}4.38$ in the thorax, $12.05{\pm}2.71$ in the pelvis, and in case of CBCT performance, $14.59{\pm}3.51$ in the head, $15.82{\pm}2.89$ in the thorax, $17.48{\pm}2.80$ in the pelvis, respectively. Conclusion : In case of Inner dose, the MVCT using MV energy showed higher than the CBCT using kV energy at 1.16 times in the head, at 1.22 times in the thorax, at 1.08 times in the pelvis, and in case of surface dose, the CBCT was higher than MVCT, at 1.25 times in the head, at 1.30 times in the thorax, at 1.45 times in the pelvis. Imaging dose was a small amount compared to the therapeutic dose but it was thought to affect partially to normal tissue because it was done in daily schedule. However, IMRT treatment was necessarily parallel with the IGRT treatment through the image-guide to minimize errors between planned and actual treatment. Thus, to minimize imaging dose that the patients receive, when planning the treatment, it should be set up a treatment plan considering imaging dose, or it must be performed by minimizing the scan range when shooting MVCT.
목 적 : 토모테라피(Tomotherapy)와 선형가속기(Linac)를 이용한 세기조절방사선치료(IMRT) 시 환자의 정확한 위치잡이를 위해 매일 시행되는 MVCT와 CBCT의 imaging dose를 비교 평가해보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 인체 모형 팬텀(Anderson rando Phantom, USA)을 Head, Thorax, pelvis의 3부위로 분류하여 촬영 부위의 중심에 $0.5{\times}0.5cm2$. 크기로 자른 GafChromic EBT3 film을 팬텀의 표면의 상, 하, 좌, 우와 팬텀의 표면에서 2cm깊이의 상, 하, 좌, 우, 중심에 위치시킨 뒤 토모테라피(Hi Art)와 Novalis Tx의 OBI를 이용하여 surface dose와 inner dose를 각각 3회씩 반복 측정한다. 측정 된 film은 RIP version6.0을 이용하여 값을 산출한 뒤 일원분산분석법을 이용하여 선량의 평균값을 산출한다. 결 과 : 인체모형팬텀을 이용하여 MVCT와 CBCT를 시행한 결과 MVCT inner dose의 측정값은 head에서 $15.43cGy{\pm}6.05$, thorax에서 $16.62cGy{\pm}3.08$, pelvis에서 $16.81cGy{\pm}5.24$로 나타났으며, CBCT inner dose는 head에서 $13.28{\pm}3.68$, thorax에서 $13.66{\pm}4.04$, pelvis에서 $15.52{\pm}3.52$의 값을 나타냈다. Surface dose의 측정 값은 MVCT 시행 시 head에서 $11.64{\pm}4.05$, thorax에서 $12.16{\pm}4.38$, pelvis에서 $12.05{\pm}2.71$로 나타났으며, CBCT의 경우 head에서 $14.59{\pm}3.51$, thorax에서 $15.82{\pm}2.89$, pelvis에서 $17.48{\pm}2.80$을 나타내었다. 결 론 : Inner dose의 경우 kV energy를 사용하는 CBCT보다 MV energy를 사용하는 MVCT에서 head에서 1.16배, thorax에서 1.22배, pelvis에 서 1.08배 높게 나타났으며, Surface dose의 경우 MVCT보다는 CBCT의 head에서 1.25배, thorax에서 1.30배, pelvis에서 1.45배 높게 측정되었다. Imaging dose는 치료 선량에 비해 작은 양이지만 daily로 시행되는 만큼 정상조직에 일정부분 영향을 미칠 것으로 생각된다. 하지만 IMRT치료를 위해서는 영상유도를 통한 IGRT가 반드시 병행되어 치료계획과 실제치료간 오차를 최소화하여야 한다. 따라서 환자가 받는 imaging dose를 최소화하기 위해서는 치료계획 시 Imaging dose를 고려하여 치료계획을 수립하거나 MVCT 촬영 시 Scan 범위를 최소화하여 시행해야 될 것으로 사료된다.