Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study for University of Teacher Education Curriculum and Reform between China and Korea

한·중 사범대학의 교육과정과 개혁에 관한 비교연구

  • 박성일 (호남사범대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 이재철 (한국교원대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 박정환 (제주대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2014.03.04
  • Accepted : 2014.07.10
  • Published : 2014.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the characteristics of teacher education curriculum and reform tendency between China and Korea. This study used literature analysis of various studies, catalogs, documents of education universities in China and Korea. The results were as follows. Some common features in the teacher education curriculum were observed, such as the purposes of education, constituent area of the curriculum, and subjects, such as pedagogy and practice teaching. Other differences included that China requires more credits for graduation than Korea, but the elective subjects are assigned fewer credits. In both countries, it is necessary to increase the relevant subjects (pedagogy, practice teaching) for the specialty of a preliminary teacher and establish a permanent system for the curriculum needs of students. In terms of reform tendency, both countries should change the training concept and teacher education philosophy, mainly on enhancing quality-oriented education, emphasizing the students' sustainable self development ability, as well as attaching importance to concept of lifelong education. These results are expected to be helpful in improving the teacher education curriculum in China and Korea.

본 연구는 한 중 사범대학들의 교육과정을 비교하고, 개혁동향을 고찰하였다. 문헌분석의 방법으로 4개 대학(서울대학교 사범대학, 한국교원대학교, 호남사범대학교, 연변대학교)의 요람, 연구논문, 보고서들을 참고하여 세부영역별로 비교 분석을 실시한 결과, 한 중 양국은 모두 목적지향형의 교원양성방식을 취하며, 기본적인 편성 운영 체제가 유사했지만, 중국의 경우 학점이수와 과목선택권 측면에서 폐쇄적인 경향이 두드러졌다. 또한, 모두 교육학과 교육실습에 해당하는 학점배분이 부족하여 향후 예비교사의 전문성 향상을 위해 이의 증치가 필요했고, 학생들의 교육과정 개혁요구를 적시에 수용할 수 있는 자체적인 상설기구의 설립이 필요했다. 양국 사범대학들의 개혁은 교육과정의 문제를 양적인 문제가 아닌 질적인 문제로 바라보고, 학생들의 자주적인 발전과 평생학습을 강조하는 방향으로 이루어지고 있었다. 본 연구는 향후 양국 사범대학의 교육과정 개정에 효과적인 기초자료가 될 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. W. G. Kang, "A Study on Preservice teacher education system to fulfill in future social environment", The Journal Korean Society of Teacher Education, Vol. 15, No 2, pp. 24-56, 1998.
  2. J. U. Goo, Education of Leading Countries in Eastern and Western, Munumsa Publisher, 2003.
  3. N. W. Kweon, "A Curriculum Analysis of comprehensive teachers' training college", Korea National University of Education Institute of curriculum, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 2-20, 2004.
  4. D. H. Kim, "A Study on Structural Characteristics of Curriculum at Teacher's College", The Journal of Korea Education, Vol. 32, No 31, pp. 217-246, 2005.
  5. S. H. Kim, A Comparative Study on Policy of Teacher and Teaching Profession Subject of University student, MS Thesis Yonsei University Graduate School, 2000.
  6. C. U. Park, "A Comparative Study on Curriculum of Elementary School Teachers Education University", The Journal Korean Society for the Study of Elementary Education, Vol 15, No 27, pp. 263-288, 2002.
  7. S. I. Park, "China Teacher Education 's Development and Reforming", Korea National University of Education Institute of curriculum, Vol. 2, No 2, pp. 22-39, 2007.
  8. Law. E. H, Galton. M, Sally. Wai-Yan. Wan, "Developing curriculum leadership in schools: Hong Kong perspectives", The Journal of Asia-Pacific Teacher Education, Vol 35, No 12, pp. 143-159, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598660701268569
  9. Fuquan. H, "Curriculum reform in contemporary China: Seven goals and six strategies", Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol 36, No 1, pp. 101-115, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002202703200004742000174126
  10. Ministry of Education in China, "The Ministry of Education on Improving Teaching Quality of Higher Vocational Education", 2006.
  11. Seoul National University College of Education, College Bulletin, 2011.
  12. Korea National University of Education, University Bulletin, 2011.
  13. Hunam Normal University, University Bulletin, 2011
  14. Yanbian University, University Bulletin, 2011.
  15. Doll. R. C, Curriculum improvement, Allyn & Bacon Publisher, 2008.
  16. D. S. Jo, "A Study on Function and Capability Strengthening Plan of Comprehensive Teachers' Training College", The Journal of Educational Administration, Vol 23, No 22. pp. 399-419, 2005.
  17. J. Wang, "The Teacher Education in China: Its Status Quo, Problems and Tendency", Teacher Education Research, Vol 16, No. 5, pp. 106-127, 2004.
  18. W. Jiang, X. Zhang, "The Developing Direction of China's Teacher Training", The Journal of Hubei University of Education, Vol 2, No. 3, pp. 54-62, 2004.
  19. C. Tan, "Establishing a First-class Teacher Educational system on the Basis of China's Conditions", The Journal of Higher Education, Vol 22, No. 2, pp. 22-55, 2000.
  20. Ministry of Education in China, "Higher Vocational Colleges Personnel Training Evaluation Work Program", 2008.
  21. Ministry of Education in China, "Outline of the National Medium and Long-term Talent Developments Plan (2010-2020)", 2010.
  22. Doll. R. C, Curriculum improvement, Allyn & Bacon Publisher, 2008.
  23. Ministry of Education in China, "General Indicators of Basic Conditions for Running Colleges and Universities", 2004.
  24. Glatthorn. A. A, Developing a quality curriculum, Alexandria Virginia Publisher, 1994.
  25. B. S. Gwak, Curriculum explanation, Kyoyookgwahaksa Publisher, 1987.
  26. J. C. Kim, Curriculum & Evaluation, Kyoyookgwahaksa Publisher, 2000.