Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Performance Measurement Method for National Research and Development Projects

국가 연구개발(R&D) 투자의 성과 측정 방법 연구

  • Yim, Sunjip (Division of Information Technology Management, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Sungcheol (Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology) ;
  • Shin, Minsoo (School of Business, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2014.03.20
  • Accepted : 2014.07.10
  • Published : 2014.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to suggest a national R&D performance measurement index from a new perspective. Government is trying to transit the R&D paradigm from 'catch-up' into 'lead- forward'. The problem of the existing performance evaluation was first identified, and the performance evaluation method of domestic & overseas research center & government was then reviewed. In particular, this study first referred to the creation & innovation indices, and focused on the national innovation and R&D ecosystem. Next, D'Aveni's Hypercompetition theory was applied to suggest a new performance measurement index, and AHP analysis interviewed from the domestic R&D performance evaluation experts was performed. This study contributes to the new national R&D performance index for the creative economy.

본 연구의 목적은 국가 연구개발(R&D) 성과측정지표의 개선안을 새로운 관점을 통해 제시하는 것이다. 정부는 R&D 패러다임을 기존의 추격형에서 선도형으로 전환하고자 하고 있다. 이에 기존 성과평가의 문제점을 살펴보고 기존 문헌 연구를 통해 국내외 연구기관 정부기관의 성과 평가안을 살펴보았다. 특히 국내외적으로 창조 혁신지표군을 참조하였고 국가혁신 및 R&D 생태계라는 개념에 주목하였다. 이론 체계로 D'Aveni의 혁신경쟁이론(Hypercompetition theory)을 차용하여 새로운 성과평가지표를 제시하였으며 국내 R&D 성과평가 전문가를 대상으로 AHP 분석을 수행하였다. 지표별 우선순위 결과 및 의미는 본문에서 상세히 밝히고 있다. 본 연구는 새로운 관점의 이론적 틀을 바탕으로 창조 혁신지표군을 참조하여 국가 R&D 성과지표군을 제안하였고 실증적 검증을 거쳐 지표별 우선순위를 제시했다는 점에서 이론적 그리고 실무적으로 공헌하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. National Science & Technology Council, National R&D output analysis and it's implication, 2009. 1.
  2. National Science & Technology Council, The basic planning of the 2nd national R&D performance evaluation, 2011. 12.
  3. R. D'Aveni, Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic management, New York. 1994.
  4. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierachy Process, NY: Mcgraw-Hill, 1980.
  5. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Improvement of national R&D performance evaluation, 2013. 8
  6. National Assembly Budget Office, Evaluation of national R&D project management, 2013. 7.
  7. Korean Intellectual Property Office, Results of Government R&D patent performance in 2012, 2013.
  8. G. W. Lee, H. B. Kim, I. H. Jang, "Diagnosis of government R&D output management & utilization system and its implication focused on researcher's perception survey", KISTEP Issue Paper, 2012
  9. J. Lane & S. Bertuzzi, "The STAR METRICS project: current and future uses for S&E workforce data", In Science of Science Measurement Workshop, held Washington DC. 2010. 12.
  10. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en
  11. H. Y. Lee & Y. T. Park, "An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 207-222. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2005.9668614
  12. B. P. Cozzarin, "Data and the measurement of R&D program impacts", Evaluation and Program planning, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 284-298. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.03.004
  13. C. F. Chien, C. P. Chen & C. H. Chen, "Designing performance indices and a novel mechanism for evaluating government R&D projects", Journal of Quality, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 119. 2009.
  14. L. Bornmann, "What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 217-233. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803
  15. K. Pho, B. Ang & F, Bai, "A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods", R&M Management Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 63-75, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00197
  16. M. E. Porter & S. Stern. "National innovative capacity", The global competitiveness report, pp. 102-118. 2002.
  17. Y. M. Go, "Analysis of foreign creation index status and suggestion for developing domestic creation index", KISTEP Issue Paper, 2013.
  18. R. Florida, The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York: Perseus Book Group, 2002.
  19. M. H. Lee, "Transition and task of the national innovation system for implementing creative economy", STEPI, 2013. 7.
  20. R. Wiggins & T. W. Ruefli, "Schumpeter's ghost: is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter?", Strategic Managment Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 887-911, 2012.