DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Above Ground Carbon Stock Through Palm Tree in the Homegarden of Sylhet City in Bangladesh

  • Dey, Anna (Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Islam, Mahmuda (Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Masum, Kaji Mohammed (Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2013.03.21
  • Accepted : 2014.01.28
  • Published : 2014.08.31

Abstract

An explanatory survey was conducted to assess the contribution of palm species in carbon sequestration in the homegarden of the Sylhet Metropolitan City Corporation of Bangladesh. Assessment was done by means of two stage random sampling. A total of 10 housing area were selected randomly for the study and 4 common palm tree species were found abundantly. From the observations abundance of palm trees [Areca catechu (175/housing area), Cocos nucifera (145/housing area), Borassus flabellifer (124/housing area) and Phoenix sylvestris (27/housing area)] were found higher in all homesteads in comparison with other species. Study revealed that total organic carbon (MTOC mt/ha) was highest in Cocos nucifera (12.48 mt/ha), followed by Areca catechu (4.20 mt/ha), Borassus flabellifer (3.02 mt/ha) and Phoenix sylvestris (0.59 mt/ha). Total amount of organic carbon stored by palm trees in homestead areas was found 20.28 metric ton/ hector in the study area. Study revealed that palm trees of homestead forest accumulate a good amount of biomass and is a good sinker of organic carbon from the atmosphere. Proper management of palm trees will help to improve the local, national and international community through carbon sequestration.

Keywords

References

  1. Alam MK, Mohiuddin M. 1992. Some Potential Multipurpose Trees for Homesteads in Bangladesh. 1st ed. Agroforestry Information Series 2. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council-Winrock International (BARC), Dhaka, Bangladesh. pp 170.
  2. Asfaw Z, Woldu Z. 1997. Crop associations of homegardens in Welayta and Gurage in southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science 20: 73-90.
  3. Barkot NK. 2010. Carbon Sequestration through Indigenous Fruit Trees of Rural Homestead in Sylhet District. Bangladesh. B. Sc. (Hons.) project paper submitted in Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, SUST. 2011.
  4. Brown S. 1997. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer FAO. FAO Forestry Paper, Rome-Italy.
  5. Carswell FE, Burrows LE, Mason NWH. 2009. Above-ground carbon sequestration by early-successional woody vegetation: a preliminary analysis. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
  6. FAO. 2003. State of Forest genetic resources conservation and management in Bangladesh. Working Paper No. FGR/68E. Rome, Italy. p 1.
  7. Henry M, Tittonell P, Manlay RJ, Bernoux M, Albrecht A, Vanlauwe B. 2009. Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129: 238-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.09.006
  8. Houghton RA, Lawrence KT, Hackler JL, Brown S. 2001. The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimate. Global Change Biol 7: 731-746. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00426.x
  9. IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). 2000. Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Special Report. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
  10. IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). 2001a. Third Assessment Report. Justus J. and Fletcher S. 2001. IB 89005: Global Climate Change (Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress).
  11. Jose D, Shanmugaratnam N. 1993. Traditional homegardens of Kerala: a sustainable human ecosystem. Agroforestry Systems 24: 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706892
  12. Karyono. 1990. Homegardens in Java; their structure and function. In: Tropical Home gardens (Landauer K, Brazil M, eds). United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 138-146.
  13. Kumar BM. 2006. Carbon sequestration potential of tropical homegardens. In: Tropical Homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry (Kumar BM, Nair PKR, eds). Springer, Dordrecht. pp 185-204.
  14. Kumar BM. 2011. Species Richness and Aboveground Carbon Stocks in the Homegardens of Central Kerala, India. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. p 11.
  15. Kumar BM, Nair PKR. 2004. The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 61-62: 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028995.13227.ca
  16. Kumar BM, Russell. 2011. Species Richness and Aboveground Carbon Stocks in the Homegardens of Central Kerala, India. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 140: 430-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.006
  17. Nair PKR. 2001. Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agroforestry Systems 53: 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013388806993
  18. Rana MP, Islam MS. 2010. The role of palm husbandry in the rural economy of the south-eastern region of Bangladesh. iForest 3: 39-43. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0528-003
  19. Rawat V, Singh D, Kumar P. 2003. Climate change and its impact on forest biodiversity. Indian Forester 129: 787-798.
  20. Schroth G, Lehmann J, Rodrigues MRL, Barros E, Macedo JLV. 2001. Plant-soil interactions in multistrata agroforestry in the humidtropics. Agroforestry Systems 53: 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013360000633
  21. Soemarwoto O. 1987. Homegardens: A traditional agroforestry system with a promising future. In: Agroforestry: a decade of development (Steppler HA. and Nair PKR, eds). ICRAF, Nairobi, pp 157-170.
  22. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ. 2000. Land use, land-use change, and forestry Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. pp375.

Cited by

  1. Functional diversity of home gardens and their agrobiodiversity conservation benefits in Benin, West Africa vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0192-5