DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement Directions for the G-SEED System from the Resident's Perspective - Focused on Certification Assessment Criteria for Apartment Buildings -

  • Received : 2014.07.01
  • Accepted : 2014.08.06
  • Published : 2014.08.31

Abstract

The building section is providing immediate causes for global climate change problems since it takes about 50% of carbon emission, 20~50% of waste discharge, 33% of energy consumption, 40% of resource use, and 17% of water consumption. So, many countries over the world have developed and implemented green building certification systems to assess sustainable performances of buildings since the early 1990s. In korea, the green building certification system to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings was first introduced in 2002 and developed as an improved version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013 after major revisions of related legislations. This research conducts a survey targeting residents on an apartment building that was certified as green building and examines the importance of assessment criteria on apartment buildings to certify green buildings using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method. And it proposes a new direction on certification assessment standards from the resident's prospective. As a result, assessment criteria such as indoor environment, ecological environment, energy & environment pollution, and maintenance management among 7 main ones turned out important on assessing the G-SEED system for apartment buildings, while criteria such as material & resource, water circulation management, and land use & transportation did relatively unimportant.

Keywords

References

  1. G-SEED Online Total Operation System, 2013. (http://g-seed.or.kr)
  2. Se-Kyung Oh, Min Suk Han, Pyeong Chan Lim. An Improvement on Evaluation Methods of Green Building Certification Criteria: Focused on the Case of Japan, U.K and U.S.A, Journal of the Korean Association of Asian Studies. Vol. 14. No. 1. 2011. p.219-241
  3. Kwang-Ho Ahn, Hyeong-Geun Kim, Yong-Seok Choi. A Study on Way Improvement of User-centered Green Building Certification System based on BIM, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design. Vol. 28. No. 1. 2012. p.101-108
  4. Yeo-Jin Choi. Analyzing Weights of Certification Assessment Criteria on the G-SEED System Using the AHP Method, Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. Vol. 13. No. 6. 2013. p.113-120 https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2013.13.6.113
  5. Hyun-Sook Jang, Sang-Ho Lee. A Comparison Study on the Importance and Problems of Assessment Items of the G-SEED System, Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. Vol. 14. No. 1. 2014. p.113-120 https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.1.113
  6. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, N.Y. McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  7. Aczel, J. and Saaty, T. L., Procedure for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 27. 1983. p.93-102.

Cited by

  1. Analyzing the Differential Views between the Designers and the Users on Certification Assessment Criteria of the G-SEED System - Focused on Certification Assessment Criteria for Apartment Buildings - vol.15, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2015.15.6.087