KIEAE Journal

Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (한국생태환경건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Distortion of Road Distance Perception by the Pattern of Object Distribution - Focused on the Distance Estimation in the Campus by Students -

인공환경 분포방식에 의한 보행거리 인지 변화에 대한 연구 - 대학 캠퍼스 내 보행로의 실제거리와 인지거리의 차이를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2014.07.31
  • Accepted : 2014.08.19
  • Published : 2014.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The behavior of walking involves our action of seeing things. It is the intention of this research that the cognitive process of perceiving things along the path can affect the way we sense the length of the journey. The theory generally accepted in this line of thought is the 'feature accumulation theory'. It assumes that if the journey includes many objects or memorable features, then our memory recalls that journey much farther than it really was. This study set up a real-life experiment by asking university students about their mental memory of the two different routes in the campus. One is a longer path that has not much to look at except trees and the other a shorter path yet with many buildings, sign boards and street furnitures. The subjects processed their mental image in the brain based on their experience. They showed a strong tendency that the path with more features were remembered longer while that with less features shorter. More interestingly, it was found that as their experience increases, they become more accurate about the exact length of the questioned paths. The result corroborates the theory that human perception of space is based on the topological understanding of surroundings rather than geometric understanding.

Keywords

References

  1. J. F. Coeterier, Cues for the perception of size of space in landscape, Journal of Environmental Management, 1994; 42; 333-347 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1994.1076
  2. A. Crompton, Perceived Distance in the City as a Function of Time, Environment and Behavior; 2006; 38; 173-182 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505276743
  3. P, Jansen-Osman and B, Berendt, Investigating distance knowledge using virtual environments, Environment and Behavior; 2002; 34; 178-193 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034002002
  4. T. R, Lee, Perceived distance as a function of direction in the city, Environment and Behavior, 1970; 2; 40-51 https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657000200103
  5. J, Littlejohn, Westrigg: The Sociology of a Cheviot parish, Routledge & K. Paul, 1970
  6. K. Lynch, The Image of the City, MIT Press; 1960
  7. D. R. Montello, The measurement of cognitive distance: methods and construct validity, Journal of Environmental Psychology; 1991; 11; 101-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80071-4
  8. J. L. Nasar, Environmental factors, perceived distance and spatial behavior, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design; 1983; 10; 275-281 https://doi.org/10.1068/b100275
  9. J. L. Nasar, H. Valencia, Z. A. Omar, S-C. Chuer, and J-H. Hwang, Out of Sight, Further from Mind: Destination visibility and distance perception, Environment and Behavior; 1985; 17; 627-639 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916585175004
  10. A. Okabe, K. Aoki, and W. Hamamoto, Distance and direction judgement in a large scale natural environment, Environment and Behavior; 1986; 18; 755-772 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586186004
  11. K. Popper, Objective Knowledge: an evolutionary approach, Oxford University Press; 1972
  12. E. K. Sadalla and L. J. Staplin, The Perception of Traversed Distances: intersections, Environment and Behavior; 1980; 12; 167-182 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916580122003