DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How to design in situ studies: an evaluation of experimental protocols

  • Sung, Young-Hye (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science & Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Chang, Juhea (Clinic for Persons with Disabilities, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute)
  • Received : 2013.11.12
  • Accepted : 2014.02.19
  • Published : 2014.08.30

Abstract

Objectives: Designing in situ models for caries research is a demanding procedure, as both clinical and laboratory parameters need to be incorporated in a single study. This study aimed to construct an informative guideline for planning in situ models relevant to preexisting caries studies. Materials and Methods: An electronic literature search of the PubMed database was performed. A total 191 of full articles written in English were included and data were extracted from materials and methods. Multiple variables were analyzed in relation to the publication types, participant characteristics, specimen and appliance factors, and other conditions. Frequencies and percentages were displayed to summarize the data and the Pearson's chi-square test was used to assess a statistical significance (p < 0.05). Results: There were many parameters commonly included in the majority of in situ models such as inclusion criteria, sample sizes, sample allocation methods, tooth types, intraoral appliance types, sterilization methods, study periods, outcome measures, experimental interventions, etc. Interrelationships existed between the main research topics and some parameters (outcome measures and sample allocation methods) among the evaluated articles. Conclusions: It will be possible to establish standardized in situ protocols according to the research topics. Furthermore, data collaboration from comparable studies would be enhanced by homogeneous study designs.

Keywords

References

  1. Cochrane NJ, Zero DT, Reynolds EC. Remineralization models. Adv Dent Res 2012;24:129-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512453845
  2. Zero DT. In situ caries models. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:214-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374950090030501
  3. Higham SM, Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Smith PW. The use of in situ models and QLF for the study of coronal caries. J Dent 2005;33:235-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.016
  4. Ritter AV, Shugars DA, Bader JD. Root caries risk indicators: a systematic review of risk models. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010;38:383-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00551.x
  5. Park SE, Yi K, Kim HY, Son HH, Chang J. Elemental analysis of the fluoride varnish effects on root caries initiation. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:290-299. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.4.290
  6. Park YS, Cho BH, Lee SP, Shon WJ. Early caries detection using optical coherence tomography: a review of the literature. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:367-376. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.367
  7. Strech D, Tilburt J. Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:521-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.001
  8. Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res 2010;1:67-69.
  9. de Arruda AM, dos Santos PH, Sundfeld RH, Berger SB, Briso AL. Effect of hydrogen peroxide at 35% on the morphology of enamel and interference in the deremineralization process: an in situ study. Oper Dent 2012;37:518-525. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-112-L
  10. Sa Y, Sun L, Wang Z, Ma X, Liang S, Xing W, Jiang T, Wang Y. Effects of two in-office bleaching agents with different pH on the structure of human enamel: an in situ and in vitro study. Oper Dent 2013;38:100-110. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-173-L
  11. Shellis RP, Ganss C, Ren Y, Zero DT, Lussi A. Methodology and models in erosion research: discussion and conclusions. Caries Res 2011;45(Supplement 1):69-77.
  12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

Cited by

  1. vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12618
  2. A Review of the Common Models Used in Mechanistic Studies on Demineralization-Remineralization for Cariology Research vol.5, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5020020
  3. The cariogenicity of commercial infant formulas: a systematic review vol.17, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-016-0228-x
  4. Evaluation of an antibacterial orthodontic adhesive incorporated with niobium-based bioglass: an in situ study vol.33, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0010
  5. Multimodal Human and Environmental Sensing for Longitudinal Behavioral Studies in Naturalistic Settings: Framework for Sensor Selection, Deployment, and Management vol.21, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2196/12832