Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Treatment of retrograde peri-implantitis: seven-year follow-up study

역행성 임플란트 근단병소 주위염(Retrograde Peri-implantitis) 치료의 7년 관찰

  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Received : 2014.04.10
  • Accepted : 2014.08.10
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is defined as a clinically symptomatic periapical lesion. RPI is generally accompanied by symptoms of pain, tenderness, swelling and fistula. Several etiologic factors of RPI were possible, residual bacteria would be the main cause of RPI. Various treatment modalities have been introduced: debridement only or a combination of debridement with the grafting material accompanied by a detoxification of the infected implant surfaces, apicoectomy and so on. Although the definitive management methods remain undefined, many favorable clinical results of a treatment of RPI have been published. This case report introduces the 7-year long-term clinical result of the application the principle: implant surface detoxification using saline and chlorhexidine and guided bone regeneration with bone graft material and barrier membrane. If the implant was not mobile, it would be possible to treat RPI according to surgical approach and good results will be maintained over long term.

역행성 임플란트 근단병소 주위염은 임상증상을 동반한 근단부의 방사선 투과성 병소로 정의되며 임플란트 식립부위 또는 인접한 치아의 잔존하고 있는 감염에서 유래한 세균감염, 골 삭제시의 열 발생 등의 다양한 원인에 의해 야기될 수 있고, 다양한 치료방법으로 임플란트를 제거하지 않고 유지할 수 있는 증례들이 보고되고 있다. 본 증례에서는 근관 치료 실패로 발치한 상악 우측 제2소구치 부위에 식립한 임플란트에서 발생한 역행성 임플란트 근단병소 주위염을 표면의 detoxification과 차폐막과 골이식재를 동반한 골유도재생술로 해결하여 기능을 회복하였으며, 7년간 장기적으로 안정적으로 유지되고 있는 증례에 대해 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Quirynen M, Gijbels F, Jacobs R. An infected jawbone site compromising successful osseointegration. Periodontol 2000 2003;33:129-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03311.x
  2. Reiser GM, Nevins M. The implant periapical lesion: etiology, prevention, and treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16:768, 770, 772 passim.
  3. Ayangco L, Sheridan PJ. Development and treatment of retrograde peri-implantitis involving a site with a history of failed endodontic and apicoectomy procedures: a series of reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:412-7.
  4. Quirynen M, Vogels R, Alsaadi G, Naert I, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Predisposing conditions for retrograde peri-implantitis, and treatment suggestions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:599-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01147.x
  5. Lin S, Mayer Y. Treatment of a large periradicular lesion of endodontic origin around a dental implant with enamel matrix protein derivative. J Periodontol 2007;78:2385-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070199
  6. Dahlin C, Nikfarid H, Alsen B, Kashani H. Apical peri-implantitis: possible predisposing factors, case reports, and surgical treatment suggestions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00108.x
  7. Flanagan D. Apical (retrograde) peri-implantitis: a case report of an active lesion. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:92-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0092:ARPACR>2.3.CO;2
  8. Chan HL, Wang HL, Bashutski JD, Edwards PC, Fu JH, Oh TJ. Retrograde peri-implantitis: a case report introducing an approach to its management. J Periodontol 2011;82:1080-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100585
  9. Green TL, Walton RE, Taylor JK, Merrell P. Radiographic and histologic periapical findings of root canal treated teeth in cadaver. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:707-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90324-3
  10. van der Stelt PF. Experimentally produced bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:306-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(85)90172-0
  11. Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:682-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.118904
  12. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976;47:256-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.5.256
  13. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37:1039-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.016
  14. Mailoa J, Lin GH, Chan HL, MacEachern M, Wang HL. Clinical outcomes of using lasers for peri-implantitis surface detoxification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2014;85:1194-202. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.130620
  15. Park JB. Treatment of peri-implantitis with deproteinised bovine bone and tetracycline: a case report. Gerodontology 2012;29:145-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00470.x
  16. Zablotsky MH, Diedrich DL, Meffert RM. Detoxification of endotoxin-contaminated titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces utilizing various chemotherapeutic and mechanical modalities. Implant Dent 1992;1:154-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199205000-00009
  17. Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:316-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01277.x
  18. Schou S, Holmstrup P, Jorgensen T, Skovgaard LT, Stoltze K, Hjorting-Hansen E, Wenzel A. Implant surface preparation in the surgical treatment of experimental peri-implantitis with autogenous bone graft and ePTFE membrane in cynomolgus monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:412-22. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00912.x