World Technopolis Review

World Technopolis Association (세계과학도시연합)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Model of Water, Energy and Waste Management for Development of Eco-Innovation Park ; A Case Study of Center for Research of Science and Technology "PUSPIPTEK," South Tangerang City, Indonesia

  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Center for Research of Science and Technology ("PUSPIPTEK") has 460 hectares land area, still maintained as a green area with more than 30% green space. There are 47 centers for research and testing technology, technology-based industries, and as well as public supporting facilities in PUSPIPTEK area. Based on the concepts developed to make this area as an ecological region, PUSPIPTEK can be seen as a model of eco-innovation. The purpose of this research is to develop a model of water, energy and waste management with eco-innovation concept. As a new approach in addressing environmental degradation and maintaining the sustainability of ecosystem, studies related to eco-innovation policy that combines the management of water, energy and waste in the region has not been done. In order to achieve the objectives of the research, a series of techniques for collecting data on PUSPIPTEK existing conditions will be carried out, which includes utilities data (water, electricity, sewage) and master plan of this area. The savings over the implementation of the concept of eco-innovation in water, energy, and waste management were calculated and analyzed using quatitative methods. The amount of cost savings and feasibility were then calculated. Eco innovation in water management among other innovations include the provision of alternative sources of water, overflow of rain water and water environments utilization, and use of gravity to replace the pumping function. Eco-innovation in energy management innovations include the use of LED and solar cell for air conditioning. Eco-innovation in waste management includes methods of composting for organic waste management. The research results: (1) The savings that can be achieved with the implementation of eco innovation in the water management is Rp. 3,032,640 daily, or Rp.1,106,913,600 annually; (2) The savings derived from the implementation of eco innovation through replacement of central AC to AC LiBr Solar Powered will be saved Rp.1,933,992,990 annually and the use of LED lights in the Public street lighting PUSPIPTEK saved Rp.163,454,433 annually; (3) Application of eco innovation in waste management will be able to raise awareness of the environment by sorting organic, inorganic and plastic waste. Composting and plastic waste obtained from the sale revenue of Rp. 44,016,000 per year; (4) Overall, implementation of the eco-innovation system in PUSPIPTEK area can saves Rp. 3,248,377,023 per year, compared to the existing system; and (5)The savings are obtained with implementation of eco-innovation is considered as income. Analysis of the feasibility of the implementation of eco-innovation in water, energy, and waste management in PUSPIPTEK give NPV at a 15% discount factor in Rp. 3,895,228,761; 23.20% of IRR and 4.48 years of PBP. Thus the model of eco-innovation in the area PUSPIPTEK is feasible to implement.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbar I. (2014) Design of Cooling System Solar Thermal Power 250 KW, Thesis (Master Degree), Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, [in Indonesian].
  2. Andersen, M. M. (2006) Eco-Innovation Indicator, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  3. Arsyad, S. (2000) Water and Soil Conservation, IPB Press Publisher, Bogor, Indonesia, pp. 90-96.
  4. Eicker, U., and Pietruschka, D. (2009) "Optimisation and Economics of Solar Cooling Systems, University of Applied Sciences Stuttgart," Advances in building energy research 3(1): 45-81. https://doi.org/10.3763/aber.2009.0303
  5. Green Building Council of Indonesia. (2012) "Guidance of Implementation of Greenship," accessed July 14, 2014, www.gbciindonesia.org, [in Indonesian].
  6. OECD (2009) Eco-innovation: Framework, Practices and Measurement (Synthesis Report), Sustainable Manufacturing, OECD, Paris, pp.13.
  7. Republic of Indonesia. (1960) Law No. 5, 1960 on Basic Rules of Agrarian, State gazette no. 104/1960, Jakarta, Indonesia, [in Indonesian].
  8. Sarkar, A. N. (2013) "Promoting Eco-Innovations to Leverage Sustainable Development of Eco-industry and Green Growth," European Journal of Sustainable Development 2(1) :171-224.
  9. Sakr, D., Baas, L., El-Haggar, S., and Huisingh, D. (2011) "Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks:global trends and Egyptian context," Journal Clean Production 19(11): 1158-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.001
  10. Tian, J., Liu, W., Lai, B., Li, X., and Chen, L. (2013) "Study of the performance of eco-industrial park development in China," Journal of Cleaner Production xxx (2013): 1-9.
  11. Zaenuri, M. (2009) Environmental Management of Industry Model Through Eco-Efficiency Samongan Industrial Park in Semarang City, Report of Research Insentif of Doctoral Program 2009, Dipenogoro University, Semarang, Indonesia, [in Indonesian]