DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Research Data Management Services of Research University Libraries in the U.S.

대학도서관의 연구데이터관리서비스에 관한 연구 - 미국 연구중심대학도서관을 중심으로 -

  • 김지현 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학 전공)
  • Received : 2014.09.01
  • Accepted : 2014.09.18
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

This study examined the current practices of Research Data Management (RDM) services recently built and implemented at research university libraries in the U.S. by analyzing the components of the services and the contents presented in their web sites. The study then analyzed the content of web pages describing the services provided by 31 Research Universities/Very High research activity determined based on the Carnegie Classification. The analysis was based on 9 components of the services suggested by previous studies, including (1) DMP support; (2) File organization; (3) Data description; (4) Data storage; (5) Data sharing and access; (6) Data preservation; (7) Data citation; (8) Data management training; (9) Intellectual property of data. As a result, the vast majority of the universities offered the service of DMP support. More than half of the universities provided the services for describing and preserving data, as well as data management training. Specifically, RDM services focused on offering the guidance to disciplinary metadata and repositories of relevance, or training via individual consulting services. More research and discussion is necessary to better understand an intra- or inter-institutional collaboration for implementing the services and knowledge and competency of librarians in charge of the services.

본 연구에서는 미국 연구중심대학도서관에서 최근 구축 운영되고 있는 연구데이터관리(Research Data Management, RDM) 서비스의 구성요소와 웹사이트에서 제공되는 서비스의 내용을 분석하여 그 현황을 조사하였다. 미국 카네기분류에서 제시된 최고연구중심대학(RU/VH) 중 RDM 서비스를 제공하는 31개 대학도서관의 서비스 내용을 분석하였으며, 분석의 기준은 선행연구에서 제시된 서비스의 구성요소 9가지로 (1) DMP 작성지원; (2) 데이터 파일 정리; (3) 데이터 기술; (4) 데이터 저장; (5) 데이터 공유 및 접근; (6) 데이터 보존; (7) 데이터 인용; (8) 데이터관리 교육; (9) 데이터 지적재산권을 포함한다. 분석 결과 대다수의 기관에서 DMP 작성지원서비스를 운영하고 있었으며 절반 이상의 기관에서 데이터 기술과 데이터 보존 및 데이터관리 교육 서비스를 제공하고 있었다. 특히 학문분야별 데이터에 적합한 메타데이터 및 레포지터리로의 안내와 워크숍 또는 개별 컨설팅을 통한 교육에 초점을 맞추고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후 기관 내 혹은 기관 간 협력에 기반을 둔 RDM 서비스 운영과 서비스 담당자의 지식 및 역량에 대한 논의와 연구가 지속되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamick, J., R. C. Reznik-Zellen, and M. Sheridan. 2012. "Data Management Training for Graduate Students at a Large Research University." Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(3): 180-188. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2012.1022
  2. Campbell, E. G., B. R. Clarridge, M. Gokhale, L. Birenbaum, S. Hilgartner, N. A. Holtzman, and D. Blumenthal. 2002. "Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey." JAMA, 287(4): 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.4.473
  3. Carnegie Foundation. 2014. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  4. Cox, A. M. and S. Pinfield. 2013. "Research Data Management and Libraries: Current Activities and Future Priorities." Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, June 28, 2013. [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  5. Fearon, D. Jr., B. Gunia, B. E. Pralle, S. Lake, and A. L. Sallans. 2013. SPEC Kit 334: Research Data Management Services. Washington, DC: ARL.
  6. Ferguson, J. 2012. "Lurking in the Lab: Analysis of Data from Molecular Biology Laboratory Instruments." Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(3). [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  7. Haendel, M. A., N. A. Vasilevsky, and J. A. Wirz. 2012. "Dealing with Data: A Case Study on Information and Data Management Literacy." PLoS Biology, 10(5), e1001339. [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001339
  8. Hswe, P. and A. Holt. 2011. NSF Data Sharing Policy. [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  9. Johnston, Lisa, Meghan Lafferty, and Beth Petsan. 2012. "Training Researchers on Data Management: A Scalable, Cross-Disciplinary Approach." Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(2). [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  10. Jones, S., A. Ball, and C. Ekmekcioglu. 2008. "The Data Audit Framework: A First Step in the Data Management Challenge." International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(2): 112-120. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i2.62
  11. Jones, S., G. Pryor, and A. Whyte. 2013. How to Develop Research Data Management Services-A Guide for HEIs. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre.
  12. Lyon, L. 2012. "The informatics Transform: Re-engineering Lbraries for the Data Decade." International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1): 126-138. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.220
  13. Molloy, Laura and Kellie Snow. 2012. "The Data Management Skills Support Initiative: Synthesising Postgraduate Training in Research Data Management." International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(2): 101-109. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.233
  14. Moon, J. 2014. "Developing a Research Data Management Service: A Case Study." Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 9(1): 1-14.
  15. Raboin, Regina, Rebecca C. Reznik-Zellen, and Dorothea Salo. 2012. "Forging New Service Paths:Institutional Approaches to Providing Research Data Management Services." Journal ofeScience Librarianship, 1(3): 134-147.
  16. Sallans, A. and M. Donnelly. 2012. "DMP Online and DMPTool: Different Strategies towards a Shared Goal." International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(2): 123-129. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.235
  17. Sayogo, D. S. and T. A. Pardo. 2013. "Exploring the Determinants of Scientific Data Sharing: Understanding the Motivation to Publish Research Data." Government Information Quarterly, 30: S19-S31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011
  18. Starr, Joan, Perry Willett, Lis Federer, Horning Claudia, and Mary Linn Bergstrom. 2012. "A Collaborative Framework for Data Management Services: The Experience of the University of California." Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(2). [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  19. Steeleworthy, M. 2014. "Research Data Management and the Canadian Academic Library: An Organizational Consideration of Data Management and Data Stewardship." Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 9(1). [online]. [cited 2014.9.14]. .
  20. Tenopir, C., R. J. Sandusky, S. Allard, and B. Birch. 2014. "Research Data Management Services in Academic Research Libraries and Perceptions of Librarians." Library & Information Science Research, 36(2): 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003
  21. Verbaan, E., and A. M. Cox. 2014. "Occupational Sub-cultures, Jurisdictional Struggle and Third Space: Theorising Professional Service Responses to Research Data Management." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40: 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.008
  22. Witt, M. 2012. "Co-designing, Co-developing, and Co-implementing an Institutional Data Repository Service." Journal of Library Administration, 52(2): 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.655607

Cited by

  1. 디지털 큐레이션 연구동향 분석과 과제: 문헌정보학 분야를 중심으로 vol.32, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.1.265
  2. Data Citation Index를 기반으로 한 연구데이터 인용에 관한 연구 vol.50, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2016.50.1.189
  3. 생명공학분야의 연구데이터 공유 사례에 관한 연구 vol.29, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2018.29.1.393
  4. 과학기술분야 연구기관의 DMP를 적용한 연구기록물 관리 vol.19, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2019.19.1.001
  5. 호주의 연구데이터 정책 및 지원체계에 대한 사례 분석 vol.36, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2019.36.4.227
  6. Geoscience 연구데이터 관리를 위한 기능별 세부요소 및 중요도에 관한 연구 vol.54, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2020.54.1.411
  7. 데이터 관리 계획의 국내 현황 및 과제 vol.20, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.06.220
  8. User needs assessment for research data services in a research university vol.52, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619856073