DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dependency Evaluation According to Damper Strut Type

댐퍼 스트럿 형상에 따른 의존성 평가

  • 이현호 (동양대학교 건축소방행정학과)
  • Received : 2014.01.27
  • Accepted : 2014.04.22
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is the displacement and velocity dependence evaluation of I type and S type metallic dampers. For this purpose, 12 metallic damper specimens are prepared and dependence test are performed. Test variables are strut type, displacement and velocity dependence. From the evaluation results of dependence tests, number of cycles are fully exceeded than minimum 5 cycles described in ASCE 7-10. According to displacement dependence test results, larger target displacement (50mm) shows lower cyclic numbers and cumulated energy dissipated area than lower target displacement (25mm). Also it show higher strength and early failure than short target displacement. In velocity dependence evaluation, fast target velocity (60mm/sec) shows lower cyclic numbers and cumulated energy dissipated area than target velocity (40mm/sec). As a results of basic properties, dependence evaluation and cumulated energy dissipated area evaluation, dependence capacity of S type metallic damper is far superior than I type.

본 연구의 목적은 I형 스트럿 및 S형 스트럿 강재댐퍼의 변위 및 속도의존성을 평가하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 12개의 강재댐퍼를 제작하여 의존성 평가를 실시하였으며, 시험 변수는 스트럿 형상, 목표 변위 및 속도이다. 의존성 시험에 의한 반복횟수 평가결과, ASCE 7-10에서 규정한 최소 반복횟수 5회를 충분히 상회하는 것으로 평가되었다. 변위의존성 평가결과, 큰 목표변위 (50mm)의 반복횟수 및 누적에너지소산능력은 적은 목표변위 (25mm)에 비하여 감소하였다. 또한 짧은 목표변위보다 큰 항복강도 및 조기파단을 나타내었다. 속도의존성 평가에서는 빠른 목표속도 (60mm/sec)의 반복횟수 및 누적에너지소산능력이 느린 목표속도 (40mm/sec)에 비하여 감소하였다. 결과적으로 강재댐퍼의 기본 물성, 의존성 평가, 누적에너지소산능력 평가결과, S형 스트럿을 가지는 강재댐퍼의 의존 능력이 I형보다 윌등히 우수한 것으로 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-10), ASCE. 179-197.
  2. Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (2005), Design and Construction Manual of Passive Seismic Control Structures, Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (in Japanese).
  3. Lee, H. H. (2013), Displacement and Velocity Dependence of Clamped Shape Metallic Dampers, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection, 17(2), 62-70 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2013.17.2.062
  4. Lee, H. H., and Kim, S. I. (2010), Metallic Damper Shape and Cyclic Behavior for the Seismic Capacity Improvement of Building Structures, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection, 14(3), 123-130 (in Korean).
  5. Lee, H. H., and Kim, S. I. (2011), Evaluation on Hysteretic Behaviors of V shaped metallic dampers, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection, 15(1), 254-262 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2011.15.1.254
  6. Soong, T. T., and Dargush, G. F. (1997), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 35-81.

Cited by

  1. Capacity Development of Existing Frame by Aramid Sheet and Energy Dissipation Device vol.19, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.5.112
  2. 강재댐퍼 형상에 따른 록킹거동 vol.20, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9712/kass.2020.20.4.45