DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Cumulative Recurrence Rate of Colonic Adenomatous Polyps After Colon Polypectomy in a Single University Hospital Health Check-up Examinees

일개 대학병원 건강검진 수진자를 대상으로 한 선종성 대장용종절제술 후 대장용종의 누적재발률

  • Hwang, Hye-Lim (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Woo-Geun (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Jin (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Yeoup (Medical Education Unit, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Byung-Mann (Department of Preventive Medicine and Occupational Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yi, Yu-Hyeon (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Young-Hye (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Tak, Young-Jin (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Dong-Wook (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Gyu (Department of Family Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
  • 황혜림 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 정우근 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 김윤진 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 이상엽 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 의학교육실) ;
  • 조병만 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학 및 산업의학교실) ;
  • 이유현 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 조영혜 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 탁영진 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 정동욱 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 이정규 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실)
  • Received : 2014.04.21
  • Accepted : 2014.08.18
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: Colonoscopy is a popular tool for screening for colon cancer throughout the world. The incidence of polypectomy and follow-up colonoscopy are persistently increasing but the studies about follow-up test after polypectomy are still lack of its domestic sources. This study is designed to look into the recurrence rate of colon polyps and risk factors after polypectomy. Methods: This is a retrospective study by reviewing medical charts of 147 patients who underwent polypectomy and follow-up colonoscopy from Jan. 2000 to Mar. 2008. The Kudo classification was used to describe the polyps found in the colonoscopy. The follow-up period was defined as the term between polypectomy and the first colonoscopy follow up. Results: Seventy six point two percent of the enrolled patient were male and the mean age was $56.5{\pm}8.1$. Mean follow-up period was $24.9{\pm}13.7$ (6 - 65) months. The cumulative recurrence rate of 1 year was 11.6%. The rate of 2 years was 36.7% and that of 3 years was 55.8%. The number of polyps was the factor which statistically showed significant relation of its recurrence rate. The histological morphology characteristic of polyps could be one independent factor which may be associated to the recurrence of polyps. Conclusions: The importance of colonoscopy follow up after polypectomy was clearly emphasized through the cumulative recurrence rate of 55.8%. Therefore, there is a need for more domestic studies with a large number of patients about the recurrence of polyps after polypectomy.

대장내시경을 이용한 대장암 선별검사가 증가하면서 발견된 용종의 절제와 추적검사가 점차 많아지고 있다. 하지만 국내에 대장용종절제 후 추적검사에 대한 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 대장용종절제술 후 용종의 재발률을 알아보고 재발 위험 인자를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 2000년 1월부터 2008년 3월까지 기간 동안에 용종절제술을 시행 받고 이후 추적검사를 시행 받은 147명의 환자를 대상으로 의무기록을 통한 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 대장내시경검사를 통해 발견된 용종은 Kudo의 분류법으로 기술하였다. 추적 조사기간은 용종절제술과 이후 시행한 추적 대장내시경 검사와의 간격으로 정의하였다. 대상자 중 남자가 76.2%이었고, 환자의 평균연령은 $56.5{\pm}8.1$세이었다. 대상자의 용종절제 후 평균 추적기간은 $24.9{\pm}13.7$(6 - 65)개월이었다. 1년 누적재발률은 11.6%, 2년 누적재발률은 36.7%이고, 3년 누적재발률은 55.8%이었다. 용종의 개수에 따라 재발율이 유의한 차이를 보였다. 용종의 재발여부에 독립적인 영향을 미치는 인자로는 조직학적 형태가 의미있는 인자로 조사되었다. 본 연구 결과 대장의 선종성 용종의 3년 누적재발률이 55%를 넘는 것으로 관찰되므로 대장용종절제 후 추적 대장 내시경의 중요성이 강조되며 향후 대장용종절제술 후 재발에 대한 국내의 대규모 연구가 이루어져야 할 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, Feuer EJ, Thum MF. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(1):10-30 https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.1.10
  2. Kang JH, Jeong BG, Cho YG, Song HR, Kim KA. Medical expenditure attributable to overweight and obesity in adults with hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia: evidence from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data and Korea National Health Corporation Data. J Agric Med Community Health 2010;35(1):77-88(Korean) https://doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2010.35.1.077
  3. National Cancer Information Center. Cancer Statistics. Cancer Incidence. [cited 26 Dec 2013]. Available from : URL:http://www.cancer.go.kr
  4. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Lankin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 2002;346(23):1781-1785 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200206063462304
  5. Prajapati DN, Saeian K, Binion DG, Staff DM, Kim JP, Massey BT, Hogan WJ. Volume and yield of screening colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center after change in medicare reimbursement. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98(1):194-199 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07172.x
  6. Harewood GC, Lieberman DA. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2(1):72-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-3565(03)00294-5
  7. Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G, Kraemer D, Morris CD. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62(6):875-883 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037
  8. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman Lm, Ederer F. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328(19):1365-1371 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199305133281901
  9. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejifec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000;343(16):162-168 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200007203430301
  10. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, OBrien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Stemberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329(27):1997-1981 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312303292701
  11. Simons BD, Morrison AS, Lev R, Verhock-Oftedahl W. Relationship of polyps to cancer of the large intestine. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84(12):962-966 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.12.962
  12. Fukutomi Y, Moriwaki H, Nagase S, Tajika M, Naito T, Miwa Y, Yamada Y, Araki H, Okuno M, Nagura K, Kato T, Ninomiya M. Metachronous colon tumors: risk factors and rationale for the surveillance colonoscopy after initial polypectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2002;128(10):569-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-002-0375-9
  13. Kulling D, Christ AD, Karaaslan N, Fried M, Bauerfeind P. The presence of more than two index adenomas is the strongest predictor of metachronous colon adenomas. Swiss Med Wkly 2002;132(11-12):139-142
  14. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O'brien MJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Levin TR, Bond JH, Brooks D, Byers T, Hyman N, Kirk L, Thorson A, Simmang C, Johnson D, Rex DK. Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy: A consensus Update by US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56(3):143-159 https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.56.3.143
  15. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O''Brien, MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Stermberg SS, Waye JD, Bond J, Schapiro M, Stewart ET. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;328(13):901-906. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199304013281301
  16. Triantafyllou K, Papatheodoridis GV, Paspatis GA, Vasilakaki TH, Elemenoglou I, Karamanolis DG. Predictors of the early development of advanced metachronous colon adenomas. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44(14):533-538
  17. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37(2):125-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70668-8
  18. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112(1):24-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2
  19. Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94(1):194-199 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00796.x
  20. Van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, Haile R, Summers R. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 1998;115(1):13-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70359-2
  21. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992;326(10):658-662 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199203053261002
  22. Yang G, Zheng W, Sun QR, Shu XO, Li WD, Yu H, Shen GF, Shen YZ, Potter JD, Zheng S. Pathologic features of initial adenomas as predictors for metachronous adenomas of the rectum. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90(21):1661-1665 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.21.1661
  23. Grossman S, Milos M, Tekawa IS, Jewell NP. Colonoscopic screening of person with suspected risk factors for colon cancer II. Past history of colorectal neoplasm. Gastroenterology 1989;96(2 Pt 1):299-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(89)91551-5
  24. Lieberman DA1, Weiss DG, Harford WV, Ahnen DJ, Provenzale D, Sontag SJ, Schnell TG, Chejfec G, Campbell DR, Kidao J, Bond JH, Nelson DB, Triadafilopoulos G, Ramirez FC, Collins JF, Johnston TK, McQuaid KR, Garewal H, Sampliner RE, Esquivel R, Robertson D. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007;133(4):1077-1085 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.006
  25. Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, Bhattacharyya AK, Reid ME, Alberts DS. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology 2001;120(5):1077-1083 https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2001.23247
  26. Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, Cabeza E, O'Morain C, Kronborg O, Faivre J; European Cancer Prevention Organisation Study Group. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(3):323-333 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0054-1
  27. Lee WC, Neugut AI, Garbowski GC, Forde KA, Treat MR, Waye JD, Fenoglio-Preiser C. Cigarettes, alcohol, coffee, and caffeine as risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps. Ann Epidemiol 1993;3(3):239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-2797(93)90025-Y
  28. Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Speizer FE, Willett WC. A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;331(25):1669-1674 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199412223312501
  29. Fornasarig M, Valentini M, Poletti M, Carbone A, Bidoli E, Sozzi M, Cannizzaro R. Evaluation of the risk for metachronous colorectal neoplasms following intestinal polypectomy: a clinical, endoscopic and pathological study. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45(23):1565-1572
  30. Chung SY. Recommendations for Colon Cancer Early Examination. Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002;24(6):317-320 (Korean)