DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Contact Lens Prescribing Pattern in Korean During 2010 to 2013

대한민국의 최근 4년간(2010-2013) 콘택트렌즈 처방 추세

  • Lee, Jong-Ha (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Catholic University of Daegu, Institute for Eye-functional Promotion) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Seok (School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales) ;
  • Chu, Byoung-Sun (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Catholic University of Daegu, Institute for Eye-functional Promotion)
  • 이종하 (대구가톨릭대학교 안경광학과, 시기능증진연구소) ;
  • 이기석 (뉴사우스웨일즈대학교 검안학과) ;
  • 추병선 (대구가톨릭대학교 안경광학과, 시기능증진연구소)
  • Received : 2014.08.01
  • Accepted : 2014.09.18
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the pattern of prescribing contact lenses in Korea from 2010 to 2013. Methods: Four hundred survey questionnaires were randomly posted to Korean Optometric clinics for 4 years. The questionnaire was the same form as a form used for International Contact Lens Prescribing Trend. It was also designed to collect information about the contact lenses prescribed to the first 10 patients after its receipt. Results: 1937 fits were used for the analysis among the four hundred survey questionnaires. The average patient age was $26.2{\pm}7.0$ in 2010, $26.1{\pm}7.6$ in 2011, $24.7{\pm}6.6$ in 2012 and $24.8{\pm}7.2$ in 2013. The patients were mainly women (75%). Of all the soft contact lenses, silicon hydrogel lenses were 18% of fits (17% in 2010, 10% in 2011, 20% in 2012, 24% in 2013). By degine, the percentage of toric design lenses accounted for 17% of soft lenses fits and had increased during 4 years (10% in 2010, 18% in 2011, 16% in 2012, 22% in 2013), and cosmetic contact lens made up for 29% (15% in 2010, 20% in 2011, 40% in 2012, 41% in 2013). Conclusions: The contact lenses wearers were mostly women and the average patient age becomes slightly younger. In relation to the increase in the mumber of younger female contact lens wearers,the percentage of cosmetic lenses prescription was much higher (29%) than the global average (7%), and it has gradually increased for last 4 years. This trend could be related to the growth of beauty market in Korea. By emphasizing on toric lens marketing in manufactures, the prescription rate has been gradually increased.

목적: 본 연구는 최근 4년간 대한민국의 안경원에서 판매된 콘택트렌즈를 조사하여 처방되는 추세를 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 매년 100개의 설문지를 무작위로 전국 안경원에 우편 발송하였다. 각 설문지의 작성은 안경원에서 설문지를 받은 후에 판매된 처음 10건의 콘택트렌즈에 대한 정보를 기재하도록 하였고, 우편이나 이메일로 반송하도록 요청하였다. 결과: 총 400개의 설문지 중에 209개의 설문지가 반송되었고, 훼손이 없고 분석에 적합한 처방건수가 1937건이었다. 콘택트렌즈를 처방 받은 고객들의 평균 나이는 2010년에는 $26.2{\pm}7.0$세, 2011년에는 $26.1{\pm}7.6$세, 2012년에는 $24.7{\pm}.6$세, 2013년에는 $24.8{\pm}7.2$세로 나타났으며, 착용자의 대부분은 여성이었다(75%). 소프트콘택트 렌즈 중에서 실리콘 하이드로겔 렌즈의 비율은 평균 18%를 차지하였고, 디자인별로 분류했을 때, 토릭렌즈의 비율은 평균 17%였으며, 이 비율은 4년간 꾸준히 증가하였다(2010년:10%, 2011년:18%, 2012년:16%, 2013년:22%). 미용렌즈는 29%의 비율을 나타내었다. 일회용 렌즈의 비율은 29%이고, 3~6개월 교체용이 가장 많은 40%로 조사되었다. 결론: 콘택트렌즈 착용자의 대부분이 여성이었으며, 평균나이는 4년간 적은 비율로 차츰 감소하였다. 나이가 어린 여성 착용자가 증가한 것은 미용렌즈의 처방이 갈수록 증가한 것과 연관된다. 또한 미용렌즈의 처방 비율(29%)은 전세계의 미용렌즈 처방 평균(7%)보다 훨씬 높게 나타났다. 이러한 미용렌즈의 성장은 한국의 미용관련 시장의 상승세와 관련 있는 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chu BS, Mah KC, Hwang JH. Contact lens market trend of korean optometric clinics in 2010. J Korean Vis Sci. 2011;13(3):225-234.
  2. Lee WJ, Sung DY, Youk DJ, Kang SS. Investigation of the current status of domestic contact lens. J Korean Ophthalmic Optics Soc. 2002;7(2):79-87.
  3. The Korea Optical News. 2014. http://www.opticnews.co.kr/news/articleView (30 July 2014).
  4. Morgan PB. How does the UK market compare with other countries'? In the second article in our series investigating the UK contact lens industry. Optician. 2001; 5799:26-33.
  5. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Grupcheva CN, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2010. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2011;26(1):30-35.
  6. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Grupcheve CN, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2011. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2012;27:26-32.
  7. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Orihuela GC, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2012. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2013;28:31-38.
  8. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Teufl I, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2013. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2014;29:30-35.
  9. Kim TH, Min GR, Sung AY. Study on the contact lenses wear status of university students. J Korean Ophthalmic Optics Soc. 2005;10(2):151-157.
  10. Kim PS, Kim SD, Kim JD, Choi CW. A survey on contact lens care in young adolescent student. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014;55(1):54-58. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2014.55.1.54
  11. Ward MA. 20 Years and Beyond: A brief history of modern lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2006;21(6):49-51.
  12. Schnider C, Steffen R. New generation of silicon-hydrogel contact lenses for daily wear. Ophtalmologia. 2005; 49(1):78-81.
  13. Young G, Sulley A, Hunt C. Prevalence of astigmatism in relation to soft contact lens fitting. Eye & Contact Lens. 2011;37(1):20-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182048fb9
  14. Charm J, Cheung SW, Cho P. Practitioners' analysis of contact lens practice in Hong Kong. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2010;33:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2010.02.001
  15. Doo HY, Sim SH, Choe OM, Gang MJ. A study on the ametropia of high school students in Jeonbuk province. J Korean Ophthalmic Optics Soc. 2002;7(2):67-71.
  16. Jung MA, Lee HJ. Survey on cosmetic color contact lens wear status of middle school, high school and college students. J Korean Vis Sci. 2013;15(4):339-446.
  17. Weekly Hana Financial Focus. 2012. http://www.hanaif.re.kr/kor/jsp/board(24 December 2012).
  18. Steinemann TL, Pinninti U, Szczotka LB, Eiferman RA, Price Jr FW. Ocular complications associated with the use of cosmetic contact lenses from unlicensed vendors. Eye & contact lens. 2003;29(4):196-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/00140068-200310000-00002
  19. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA. An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94(1):87-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00524.x

Cited by

  1. Study of Masking Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Cornea after Refractive Surgery vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.2.91
  2. Changes in Subjective/Objective Symptoms and Lens Parameters by the Education for Cosmetic Contact Lens Care vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.4.361
  3. The Correlation Between Corneal Eccentricity and Radius Curvature by Fitting Status of Soft Contact Lens Wearer vol.4, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15205/kschs.2016.12.31.662
  4. The Actual State of Wearing and Caring for Cosmetic Colored Soft Contact Lens in Female High School Students vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.1.11
  5. Evaluation for Surficial and Internal Hydrophilicity of Soft Contact Lenses vol.22, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.3.213
  6. Comparison of Accommodative Function and Eye Movements Response by Wearing Single and Aspheric Center-Near Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses in their 20s vol.22, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.4.405
  7. The Effect of Non-compliant Use of an Eyewash Solution on Lens Parameters and Pigmentation of Circle Soft Contact Lenses vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.4.365
  8. Analysis physical properties of silcone hydrogel contact lenses in Korea vol.19, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17337/jmbi.2017.19.1.1
  9. Subjective Symptoms according to Fitting Test in Soft Contact Lens Wearers vol.20, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17337/jmbi.2018.20.4.431
  10. Comparing Visual Acuity and Frontal Area Topography in Prescription of Spherical and Toric Soft Contact Lens vol.21, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17337/jmbi.2019.21.1.71
  11. Effects of Refractive Anomalies on Contact Lens Users’ Quality of Life vol.24, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2019.24.2.125
  12. A Comparison of Tears Volume and Lens Movement between Normal and Dry Eyes When Wearing Daily Wear Soft Lenses with High Water Content vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2019.24.4.403
  13. Comparison of Frequent Replacement Circle Soft Contact Lenses in Sagittal Depth vol.22, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17337/jmbi.2020.22.1.83