Required Sample Size for Estimating Litter Mass in Northern Hardwood Forests, New Hampshire, USA

미국 뉴햄프셔주 낙엽활엽수림에서 낙엽량 측정을 위한 최소 필요 표본수

  • Bae, Kikang (International Cooperation Division, International Affairs Bureau, Korea Forest Service)
  • 배기강 (산림청 국제협력담당관실)
  • Received : 2014.07.24
  • Accepted : 2014.09.01
  • Published : 2014.09.30


In order to accurately estimate the litter mass, we evaluated the required sample sizes across 13 chronosequence stands for five years (1994~1996, 2003~2004) in northern hardwood forests in New Hampshire, USA. It was found that the number of required litter traps in our stands (0.25~0.5 ha) within ${\pm}10%$ of the sample mean was appeared to be similar or higher than the 15 litter traps installed in this study. Notably, in 1994 and 1995, the number of required litter trap was twice higher than the 15 litter traps. Further, within ${\pm}20%$ of the sample mean, the number of required litter traps was less than 10 across all 13 stands for five years, which indicates that we can reduce the sample size. Precisely, the number of sample size had increased in stands with steep and high elevation, but no relations with stand age across 13 stands were observed. Based on these results, we suggest that it is important to sample litter mass for several years, in order to determine the number of appropriate sample size, and stands with steep and high elevation may need more litter traps.


  1. Berg B and R Laskowski. 2005. Litter decomposition: A guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv. Ecol. Res. 38:20-71.
  2. Clark DA, B Sandra, WK David, QC Jeffrey, RT John, N Jian and AH Elisabeth. 2001. Net primary production in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecol. Appl. 11:371-384.[0371:NPPITF]2.0.CO;2
  3. Clark DB, PC Olivas, SF Oberbauer, DA Clark and MG Ryan. 2008. First direct landscape scale measurement of tropical rain forest Leaf Area Index, a key driver of global primary productivity. Ecol. Lett. 11:163-172.
  4. Dellenbaugh M, JC Innes and MJ Ducey. 2007. Double sampling may improve the efficiency of litterfall estimates. Can. J. For. Res. 37:840-845.
  5. Finotti R, SR Freitas, R Cerqueira and MV Vieira. 2003. A Method to Determine the Minimum Number of Litter Traps in Litterfall Studies. Biotropica 35:419-421.
  6. Gower ST, O Krankina, RJ Olson, M Apps, S Linder and C Wang. 2001. Net primary production and carbon allocation patterns of boreal forest ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 11:1395-1411.[1395:NPPACA]2.0.CO;2
  7. Hughes JW and TJ Fahey. 1994. Litterfall dynamics and ecosystem recovery during forest development. Forest Ecol. Manag. 63:181-198.
  8. Newman GS, MA Arthur and RN Muller. 2006. Above- and Belowground Net Primary Production in a Temperate Mixed Deciduous Forest. Ecosystems 9:317-329.
  9. Petersen RG and LD Calvin. 1986. Sampling. pp.33-51. In American Society of Agronomy Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc. (Campbell GS, DR Nielsen, RD Jackson, CA Klute and MM Mortland eds.). Madison, WI, USA.
  10. Proctor J. 1983. Tropical forest litter-fall. I. Problems of data comparison. pp.267-273. In Tropical Rain Forest Ecology and Management (Sutton SL, TC Whitmore and CA Chadwick eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  11. Starr M, A Saarsalma, T Hokkanen, P Merila and H Helmisaari. 2005. Models of litterfall production for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Finland using stand, site and climate factors. Forest Ecol. Manag. 205:215-225.
  12. Stocker GC, WA Thompson, AK Irvine, JD Fitzsimon and PR Thomas. 1995. Annual patterns of litterfall in a lowland and tableland rainforest in tropical Australia. Biotropica 27:412-420.
  13. Yanai RD, MA Arthur, M Acker, CR Levine and BB Park. 2012. Variation in mass and nutrient concentration of leaf litter across years and sites in New Hampshire northern hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 42:1597-1610.