DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Nano Grain Growth on Coefficient of Thermal Expansion in Electroplated Fe-Ni Invar Alloy

Fe-Ni Invar 합금에서 나노 결정립 성장이 열팽창계수에 미치는 영향

  • Yim, Tai Hong (Heat-treatment and Surface Engineering R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial CTEhnology(KICTEH)) ;
  • Choe, Byung Hak (Dept of Metal and Materials Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Jeong, Hyo Tae (Dept of Metal and Materials Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 임태홍 (한국생산기술연구원 표면처리연구실용화그룹) ;
  • 최병학 (강릉원주대학교 신소재금속공학과) ;
  • 정효태 (강릉원주대학교 신소재금속공학과)
  • Received : 2014.07.01
  • Accepted : 2014.08.27
  • Published : 2014.10.27

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to consider the effect of annealing on the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of electroplated Invar Fe-Ni alloy. The CTE of the as-electroplated alloy is lower than those of alloys annealed at $400^{\circ}C$ and $800^{\circ}C$. XRD peaks become sharper as the as-electroplated alloy is annealed, which means the grain growth. The average grain sizes of as-electroplated and as-annealed alloys at $400^{\circ}C$ and $800^{\circ}C$ are 10 nm, 70 nm, and $2{\mu}m$, respectively, as determined by TEM and EBSD analyses. The CTE variation for the various grain sizes after annealing may come from the magnetostriction effect, which generates strain due to changes in the magnetization state of the alloys. The thermal expansion coefficient is considered to be affected by nano grain size in electroplated Fe-Ni Invar alloys. As grain size decreases, ferromagnetic forces might change to paramagnetic forces. The effect of lattice vibration damping of nano grain boundaries could lead to the decrease of CTE.

Keywords

References

  1. X. G. Zheng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 5170 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5170
  2. A. L. Goodwin, Nature Nanotechnology, 3, 711 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.355
  3. K. Suzui, A. Makino, N. Kataoka, A. Inoue and T. Masumoto, Mater. Trans. JIM, 32(1), 93 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1989.32.93
  4. Y. Liua, L. Liua, Z. Wua, J. Lia, B. Shena and W. Hua, Scr. Mater., 63(4), 359 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.006
  5. C. Wang, S. Q. Yuan, C. G. Yao and Z. P. Feng, Adv. Mater. Res., 690, 290 (2013).
  6. Y. Aikawa1, T. Terai and T. Kakeshita, J. Phys.: Conference Series 165(1), 012057 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/165/1/012057
  7. Gildas Diguet, Doctor Thesis, Univ. of Grenoble in CRETA CNRS-Grenoble (2010).
  8. X. Lu, Z. Qin, Y. Zhang, B. Ding and Z. Hu, Scr. Mater., 42, 433 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00377-2
  9. H. Abrams, Metallography, 4, 59 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0800(71)90005-X
  10. M. Lee, Y. Han, H. Um and T. H. Yim, Proceeding of The Korean Society For CTEhnology of Plasticity, 492 (2012).