DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Health Status Evaluation Based on Questionnaire SF-36 Among Residents Exposed and Non-exposed to Extremely Low Frequency-electric and Magnetic Fields (ELF-EMFs)

설문조사에 근거한 전자파 발생원 주변 주민과 비주변 주민의 건강수준 평가

  • Jeon, Hyung Jin (Korea Environment Institute, Division of Environmental Information Research) ;
  • Kim, Yoon Shin (Institute of Environmental and Industrial Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Yoon, Jeong Ho (Korea Environment Institute, Division of Environmental Information Research) ;
  • Cho, Nam Wook (Korea Environment Institute, Division of Environmental Information Research) ;
  • Son, Seoung Woo (Korea Environment Institute, Division of Environmental Information Research)
  • 전형진 (한국환경정책평가연구원) ;
  • 김윤신 (한양대학교 환경 및 산업의학연구소) ;
  • 윤정호 (한국환경정책평가연구원) ;
  • 조남욱 (한국환경정책평가연구원) ;
  • 손승우 (한국환경정책평가연구원)
  • Received : 2014.09.03
  • Accepted : 2014.10.22
  • Published : 2014.10.31

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the health status of residents who were exposed to sources of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) in the living environment and those who were not exposed to such a source of ELF-EMFs through a survey designed to appraise the residents' health levels. Method: Aimed at 251 residents exposed to a source of ELF-EMFs and 278 residents not exposed to a source, the survey was conducted to investigate the health status of the residents on the basis of questionnaire SF-36. Result: The health status scores of residents exposed to ELF-EMFs turned out to be lower than those of their counterparts. In terms of self-reported symptoms related to health and sleep quality, residents exposed to ELF-EMFs were found to have a higher complaint rate of self-reported symptoms such as dizziness, depression, and fatigue. Regarding sleep disorders, residents exposed to ELF-EMFs appeared to have a slightly higher complaint rate of sleep disorders compared to non-exposed residents. Conclusion: If a region is to be exposed to a source of ELF-EMFs, a more proactive policy for reducing such exposure is advised. In addition, it is necessary to better understand problems of residents by emplacing an ELF-EMFs risk information delivery system and building an efficient communication system for voluntary participation during the construction phase.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YS. Study on health impact assessment from involuntary electromagnetic fields of exposed people, Final report. Gwacheon: Ministry of Environment Press; 2009. p.1-2
  2. Jeon IS, Cho HN. Exposure Limits of Magnetic Field in the High-Voltage Transmission Line, Final Report. Seoul: Korea Environment Institute Press; 2006. p.1-2.
  3. The ecojournal. Jang Ha Na, Management of Hazardous Substances of Electromagnetic Fields. http://www.ecojournal.co.kr/news_view.html?code=01010000&uid=79836&cpage=1[accessed 21 February 2014]
  4. Kim N, Lee SW, Park SM, Lee HM, Jeon SK. A Study on Analysis and Survey of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity(EHS), Final Report. Chonnam: National Radio Reserarch Agency Press; 2007.
  5. Yang DI. Assessment of subjective symptoms by 60 Hz magneticfield in electromagnetic hypersensitivity. [Seoul]: Yonsei University; 2010.
  6. Roosli M, Moser M, Baldinini Y, Barun-Fahrlander C. Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure a questionnaire survey. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004; 207(2): 141-50. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00269
  7. Hillert L, Berglind N, Arnetz BB, Bellander T. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002; 28(1): 33-41. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.644
  8. Levallois P. Hypersensitivity of human subject to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110(4): 613-618
  9. Park HJ. Health-related quality of life in adults from EMF exposure in living conditions. [Gimhae]: Inje University; 2007.
  10. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992; 30(6): 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
  11. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item shortform health survey : construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical care. 1996; 34(3): 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
  12. Koh SB, Chang SJ, Kang MG, Cha BS, Park JG. Reliability and validity on measurement instrument for health status assessment in occupational workers. J Prev Med Public Health. 1997; 30(1): 129-144.
  13. Nam DH, Lee SW. Testing the validity of the korean SF-36 health survey. J Korean Soc Health Stat. 2003; 28(2): 3-24.
  14. Kim SA, Park KS, Jang MK, Kam S. Medical facilities utilization according to health status measured by SF-36 in male workers. Korean J occup Environ Med. 2006; 18(4): 272-283.
  15. Park SY, Kim JK. Assessment of quality of life among patients with occupational injuries and illnesses using SF-36. J Korean Soc Occup Ther. 2008; 16(2): 73-89.
  16. Yamazaki S, Sokejima S, Mizoue T, Eboshida A, Fukuhara S. Health-related quality of life of mother of children with leukemia in Japan. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(4): 1079-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-3288-z
  17. Preece AW, Georgiou AG, Dunn EJ, Farrow SC. Health response of two communities to military antennae in Cyprus. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 64(6): 402-408.
  18. Jeon JY, Kim SA, Park US, Hong YM. The assesment of rural elderly's health status by SF-36. Kwandong Med J. 2001; 5(1): 93-101.
  19. Cho YS, Kim YS, Lee JT, Hong SC, Jang SK. Relationship between urinary melatonin levels and extremely low frequency magnetic fields for the selected primary schoolchildren living nearby and away from overhead transmission power line. J Enviorn Health Sci. 2004; 30(3): 191-206.