기술혁신학회지 (Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society)

  • 제17권3호
  • /
  • Pages.563-583
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1598-2912(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8666(eISSN)
한국기술혁신학회 (Korea Technology Innovation Society)
권호 표지

과학기술계 출연연구기관의 지식창출 협력유형 분석에 관한 연구: 개방성과 다양성 중심으로

A Study on the Collaboration Types of Knowledge Creation in Korean Government-supported Research Institutes of S&T: Focusing on Openness and Diversity

  • 박주형 (한국기계연구원, 성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 이희상 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2014.06.10
  • 심사 : 2014.10.02
  • 발행 : 2014.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 지식창출 협력유형을 개방성과 다양성 측면으로 분류하고 출연(연)별 지식창출 협력 경향과 특성을 분석하였다. 개방성은 외부의존성과 협력주도성을, 다양성은 협력다양성, 협력집중성 지표를 정량화하여 기관 및 국가 레벨로 하는 4가지 분류모형을 제시하였다. 데이터는 26개 과학기술계 출연(연)의 연구자가 포함된 SCOUPS DB의 39,507편의 논문을 대상으로 하였다. 분석결과, 개방성 측면의 기관 레벨에서는 출연(연)이 연구를 주도하기 보다 연구에 참여하는 형태로 다수의 외부기관과 협력하는 "다자간협력참여형" 유형으로, 국가 레벨에서는 다수의 기관이 "국외다수기관협력형"으로 분류되었다. 다양성 측면의 기관 레벨에서는 소수 혹은 특정기관에 집중되는 "편식협력형" 혹은 "단식협력형" 유형으로, 국가 레벨에서는 다수의 출연(연)이 "다수국가참여 특정국가집중형" 혹은 "소수국가참여 특정국가집중형" 유형에 집중되었다. 출연(연)이 경쟁력을 갖춘 지식을 창출하는 기관으로 성장하기 위해서는 외부조직과 협력을 하되, 연구를 주도하는 전략 혹은 연구생산성을 확보한 독자적 연구기관으로 전환해 나가는 전략이 필요하다.

We classified collaboration types of Government-supported Research Institutes (GRIs) in Korea to make a creation knowledge with the openness and the diversity. The openness is described to collaboration dependence and leading intensity, and the diversity is expressed to collaboration diversity and collaboration concentration. We suggest four taxonomy models explained in terms of the openness and the diversity with country level and institute level. This study uses 39,507 papers in SCOUPS DB that include author(s) affiliated to 26 GRIs. It concludes that many GRIs is classified to the type of multilateral collaboration follower in institute level and to the type of global network player in country level from the perspective of openness. In the aspect of diversity, many GRIs is concentrated to the collaboration type of picky eater or monophagous in institute level and to the multinatioal asymmetry type or non-multinational asymmetry type in country level. It is necessary for GRIs to lead collaboration and to transfer inhouse R&D institutes with high performance to be competitive institutes which make high quality knowledge.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 과기분야 출연(연) 발전전략 TF (2013), 창조경제 실현을 위한 출연(연) 발전전략 보고서.
  2. 국가과학기술심의회 (2013), "출연(연) 개방형 협력 생태계 조성을 위한 과학기술분야 연구회 기능 재정립 방향(안)", 제4회 안건.
  3. 김명순.유제훈.고재상.이영덕 (2000), "국가출연연구기관의 지식자산 모델", 기술혁신연구, 8(1): 197-216.
  4. 김성홍 (2007), 개방형 기술혁신을 위한 산업법 혁신 네트워크 구축전략 수립, 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
  5. 미래창조과학부 (2013), "과학기술과 ICT를 통한 창조경제와 국민행복 실현", 2013년도 업무보고.
  6. 성지은 (2002), "탈추격 혁신을 위한 출연(연)의 구조적 한계와 과제: ETRI를 중심으로", 기술 혁신연구, 20(2): 1-28.
  7. 이달환 (1996), 이공계 출연(연)의 역할 및 운영개선 방안, 서울: 과학기술정책관리연구소.
  8. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T. and Silverman, B. S. (2000), "Don't Go It Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups' Performance in Canadian Biotechnology", Strategic Manangement Journal, 21(3): 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8
  9. Chesbrough, H. and Appleyard, M. M. (2007), "Open Innovation and Strategy", California Management Review, 50(1): 57-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166416
  10. Cronin, B., Shaw, D. and Barre, K. L. (2004), "Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work: Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2): 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10353
  11. Cummings, J. N. (2004), "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization", Management Science, 50(3): 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
  12. Egghe, L. (1991), "Theory of Collaboration and Collaborative Measures", Information Processing & Management, 27(2/3): 177-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(91)90048-Q
  13. Faems, D., Looy, B. V. and Debackere, K. (2005), "Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation : Toward a Portfolio Approach", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3): 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
  14. Gauffriau, M. and Larsen, P. O. (2005), "Counting Methods Are Decisive for Rankings Based on Publication and Citation Studies", Scientometrics, 64(1): 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0239-6
  15. Hagedoorn, J. (1993), "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Nterorganizational Models of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences", Strategic Management Journal, 14(5): 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505
  16. Hagedoorn, J., Roijakkers, N. and Van Kranenburg, H. (2006), "Inter-Firm R&D Networks: The Importance of Strategic Network Capabilities for High-Tech Partnership Formation", British Journal of Management, 17(1): 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00474.x
  17. Huang, M., Lin, C. and Chen, D. (2011), "Counting Methods, Country Rank Changes, and Counting Inflation in the Assessment of National Research Productivity and Impact", Journal of the american society for information science and technology, 62(12): 2427-2436. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21625
  18. Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. and Salgado, J. F. (2009), "Team-level Predictors of Innovation at Work; A Comprehensive Meta-analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research", Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5): 1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
  19. Kavadias, S. and Sommer, S. C. (2009), "The Effects of Problem Structure and Team Diversity on Brainstorming Effectiveness", Management Science, 55(12): 1899-1913. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1079
  20. Katz, J. S. and Hicks D. (1997), "How Much Is a Collaboration Worth? A Calibrated Bibliometric Model", Scientometrics, 40(3): 541-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459299
  21. Klomp, L. and Van Leeuwen, G. (2001), "Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach", International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3): 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510110079612
  22. Kwon, K., Park, H. W., So, M. and Leydesdorff, L. (2012), "Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea's National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-authorship Relationships in South Korea", Scientometrics, 90(1): 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9
  23. Larsen, P. O. (2008), "The State of the Art in Publication Counting", Scientometrics, 77(2): 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1991-6
  24. Lauren, K. and Sater, A. (2006), "Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms", Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  25. Love, J. and Roper, S. (1999), "The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects", Review of Industrial Organization, 15(1): 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757110963
  26. Liu, H., Chang, B. and Chen, K. (2012), "Collaboration Patterns of Taiwanese Scientific Publications in Various Research Areas", Scientometrics, 92(1): 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0719-4
  27. Moody, J. (2004), "The Structure of Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999", American Sociological Review, 69(2): 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900204
  28. Park, G. and Kang, J. (2013), "Alliance Addiction: Do Alliances Create Real Benefits?", Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(1): 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12016
  29. Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011), "The Impact of Technological Relatedness, Prior Ties, and Geographical Distance on University-industry Collaborations: A Joint-patent Analysis", Technovation, 31(7): 355-379.
  30. Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, D. and Petteault, M. (2007) "Measuring Researcher Interdisciplinarity", Scientometrics, 72(1): 117-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5
  31. Subramanyam, K. (1983), "Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A Review", Journal of Information Sciene, 6(1): 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105
  32. Teodorescu, D. and Andrei, T. (2011), "The Growth of International Collaboration in East European Scholarly Communities: A Bibliometric Analysis of Journal Articles Published between 1989 and 2009", Scientometrics, 89(2): 711-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0466-y
  33. Witzeman, S., Slowinski, G., Dirkx, R., Gollob, L., Tao, J., Ward S. and Miraglia S. (2006), "Harnessing External Technology for Innovation", Research Technology Management, 49(3): 19-27.