DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Types of Milking Instrument and Season on Milk Composition in Holstein-Friesian lactating Cows

착유시스템 및 계절이 홀스타인 착유우의 유성분에 미치는 영향

  • Nam, In-Sik (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Heo, Byong-Moo (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Park, Ho-Kyung (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Min, Tae-Hong (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Son, Yong-Suk (Division of Biotechnology, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Seong-Min (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.) ;
  • Kwon, Eung-Gi (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.) ;
  • Chang, Kyeong-Man (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2014.09.02
  • Accepted : 2014.09.20
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of different types of milking instrument and season on milk composition (fat, protein, non-fat milk solids, milk urea nitrogen and somatic cell count) on Holstein-Friesian lactating cows. Raw milk samples were collected from 20 automatic milking system (AMS) installed dairy farms and 85 conventional milking system (CMS) installed dairy farms. Milk fat, protein, NFMS and MUN contents did not changed between AMS and CMS and different seasons. On the other hand, the average SCC in AMS was $239{\times}10^3cells/mL$ which was lower than in CMS ($373{\times}10^3cells/mL$, (p<0.05). In conclusion, present results indicated that SCC in milk might be influenced by AMS. However, this area needed more study to confirm the reason of reducing SCC content from AMS.

Keywords

References

  1. Aganga, A.H., Umna, N.N., Oyendipe, E.O., Okoh, P.N., Aduku, A.O., 1990. Response to water deprivation by yankasa ewes under different physiological states. Small Rumin. Res. 3, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(90)90086-L
  2. Allore, H.G., Oltenacu, P.A., Erb, H.N., 1997. Effects of season, hard size, and geographic region on the composition and quality of milk in the Northeast. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 3040-3049. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76271-4
  3. Bennedsgaard, T.W., Rasmussen, M.D., Pedersen, L.H., Bjerring, M., 2006. Changes in herd health and conversion to automatic milking systems. In: 11th XI International Symposium of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Australia, Cairns, 864.
  4. Berglund, I., Pettersson, G., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., 2002. Automatic milking: Effects on somatic cell count and teat end quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00090-8
  5. Berman, A., Folman, Y.M., Kaim, M., Maman, Z., Herz, D., Wolfenson, A., Garber, Y., 1985. Upper critical temperatures and forced ventilation effects for highyielding dairy cows in a tropical climate. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 488-495.
  6. Collier, R.J., Beede, D.K., Thatcher, W.W., Israel, L.A., Wilcox, C.J., 1982. Influences of environmental and its modification on dairy animal health and production. J. Dairy Sci. 65, 2213-2227. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82484-3
  7. de Koning, K., Slaghuis, B., van der Vorst, Y., 2003. Robotic milking and milk quality: Effects on bacterial counts, somatic cell counts, freezing points and free fatty acids. Ital. J. Animl. Sci. 2, 291-299.
  8. Hagen, K., Langbein, J., Schmied, C., Lexer, D., Waiblinger, S., 2005. Heart rate variability in dairy cows-Influences of breed and milking system. Physiol. Behave. 85, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.03.019
  9. Hamann, J., Reinecke, F., 2002. Machine milking effects on udder health comparison of a conventional with a robotic milking system. In: International Symposium 1th Robotic Milking: Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Wageningen, Netherlands, Wageningen., IV-17-IV-27.
  10. Hof, G., Vervoorn, M.D., Lenaers, P.J., 1997. Milk urea nitrogen as a tool to monitor the protein nutrition of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 3333-3340. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76309-4
  11. Kadzere, C.T., Murphy, M.R., Shianikove, N., Maltz, E., 2002. Heat stress in lactating cows; a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 77, 59-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00330-X
  12. Klei L.R., Lynch, J.M., Barbano, D.M., Oltenacu, P.A., Lednor, A.J., Bandler, D.K., 1997. Influence of milking three times a day on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 427-436. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75954-X
  13. Klungel, G.H., Slaghuis, B.A., Hogeveen, H., 2000. The effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1998-2003. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75077-6
  14. Ki, K.S., Jeong, Y.H., Park, S.J., Kim, S.B., Lee, W.S., Lee, H.J., Lim, D.H., Kim, H.S., Kwon, E.G., Cho, M.Y., Jeo, J.M., 2011. Comparison of milk yield and milk composition between before and after auto milking system (AMS) use in dairy cow. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 17(3), 189-196.
  15. Ki, K.S., Kim, J.H., Jeong, Y.H., Kim, Y.H., Park, S.J., Kim, S.B., Lee, W.S., Lee, H.J., Cho, W.M., Baek, K.S., Kim, H.S., Kwon, E.G., Kim, W.Y., Jeo, J.M., 2011. A Survey on satisfaction measurement of automatic milking system in domestic dairy farm. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 17(1), 39-48.
  16. Kwon, D.J., Kim, W., Lee, D.W., 2002. Position analysis of cow teats for teat-cup attachment system on robotic milking system. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 8(3), 159-164.
  17. McDowell, R.E., Hooven, N.W. and camoens, J.K., 1976. Effect of climate on performance of Holsteins in first lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 59, 965-973. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84305-6
  18. Nam, K.T., Kim K.H., Nam, I.S., Abanto Oliver D., Hwang S.G., 2009. Seasonal and regional effects on milk composition of dairy cows in South Korea. J. Animl. Sci. & Technol. 51(6), 537-542. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2009.51.6.537
  19. National Statistical Office., 1984-2013. livestock trend investigation. (retrieved 2014.04.25.).
  20. Rasmussen, M.D., Blom, J.Y., H Nielsen, L.A., Justesen, P., 2001. Udder health of cows milked automatically. Livest. Prod. Sci. 72, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00275-5
  21. Roenfeldt. S., 1998. You can't afford to ignore heat stress. Dairy Manage. (retrieved 1998.05.01.).
  22. Roseler, D.K, Ferguson, J.D. and Sniffen, C.J., 1993. Dietary protein degradability effects on plasma, milk urea nitrogen and milk nonprotein nitrogen in holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76, 525-534. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77372-5
  23. Sharma, A.K., Rodriguez, L.A., Mekonnen, G., Wilcox, C.J., Bachman, K.C., Collier, R.J., 1983. Climatological and genetic effects on milk composition and yield. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81762-7
  24. Speroni, M., Pirlo, G., Lolli, S., 2006. Effect of automatic milking systems on milk yield in a hot environment. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 4687-4693. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72519-X
  25. Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Berglund, I., Pettersson, G., 2000. The milking process in an automated milking system, evaluation of milk yield, teat condition and udder health. in: robotic milking: proceedings of the international symposium held in lelystad, Netherlands, Wageningen, 277-288.
  26. Svennersten-Sjaunja K.M., Pettersson, G., 2007. Pro and cons of automatic milking in Europe. J. Animl. Sci. 2008. 86, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0527
  27. The Meteorological Administration., 2009-2013. Weather chronological list. (retrieved 2014.07.29.).
  28. Yagi, Y., Shiono, H., Chikayama, Y., Ohunuma, A., Nakamura, I., Yayou, K.-I., 2004. Transport stress increases somatic cell counts in milk, and enhances the migration capacity of peripheral blood neutrophils of dairy cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66, 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.66.381