Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Analysis of Crew Members Fatigue Survey for the Ship Types in Korea

국내 선종별 선박승무원 피로도 분석에 관한 연구

  • Yang, Won-Jae (Division of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 양원재 (목포해양대학교 해상운송시스템학부)
  • Received : 2014.09.30
  • Accepted : 2014.10.16
  • Published : 2014.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents the crew members fatigue survey in order to understand the current state of various fatigue causal factors and personnel fatigue subjective symptoms, and then analyzes the survey items. The results of this survey are as follows. Firstly, many crew members were struggling with the lack of sleep and rest hour. Secondly, environmental factors such as weather, ship motion and vibration, noise, accommodation condition etc. disturbed the sleep of crew members. In third, their duty hours were more than 10 hours per day in certain types of ship. In fourth, they felt fatigue a lot when they were on board because of the workload and stress. Lastly, in some measurement items of fatigue symptoms(physical, mental, emotional), many crew members were experiencing more than moderate fatigue symptoms.

본 연구에서는 승선 중인 해기사의 피로도 유발요인에 대한 현황과 개인별 피로도 자각증상 항목들에 대한 실태를 파악하기 위하여 설문조사를 실시하고 그 결과를 선종별로 분석하였다. 설문조사 분석결과 선종별로 많은 해기사들이 수면과 휴식시간의 부족을 겪고 있음을 확인할 수 있었고, 수면을 방해하는 요인은 다양하지만 특히 날씨, 선체의 운동 및 진동, 소음, 거주시설 등 환경적 요인이 많이 작용하는 것을 파악하였다. 그리고 일부 선종의 경우는 하루 평균 10시간 이상 당직근무를 수행하고 있었으며, 과다한 업무로 기인한 스트레스와 더불어 많은 피로감을 느끼는 것으로 조사되었고, 영역별(육체적, 정신적, 감정적) 피로도 증상 측정항목에 대해서 일부항목의 경우는 많은 해기사들이 상당한 피로도 증상을 경험하고 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. IMO(1997), Code for the Investigation of Marine causalities and Incidents, Res. A. 849(20), pp. 1-10.
  2. IMO(1999), Appendix 2, Guidelines for the Investigation of Human Factors in Marine causalities and Incidents, Res. A. 884(21), pp. 1-20.
  3. IMO(2001), Guidance on Fatigue Mitigation and Management, MSC/Circ. 1014, pp. 3-28.
  4. Kim, H. T. et al.(2007), "Development of Collision Scenario -Based Evaluation System for the Cognitive Performance of Marine Officers", Journal of Korea Institute of Navigation and Port Research", Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2007.31.1.001
  5. KIOST(2009), Development of Prevention and Management Technology for Human-related Marine Accidents, Report, pp. 1-45.
  6. Korea Maritime Safety Tribunal(2014), Marine Accidents Statistics 2014, http://www.kmst.go.kr.
  7. Korea Maritime Safety Tribunal(2012), An Analysis of the Crew members Fatigue and the Relationship of Marine Accidents and Fatigue, Report, pp. 31-36.
  8. Maritime Accident Casebook(2012), Fatigue Risk Management on the Horizon, http://maritimeaccident.org/2012/03/fatigue-risk-manage ment-on-the-horizon/#more-18214.
  9. Maritime accident Investigation Branch(2004), http://www.maib.gov.uk.
  10. Rhodes, W. and Gil, V.(2002), Fatigue Management Guide for Canadian Marine Pilots, A Trainer's Handbook(TP 13960E), pp. 3-16.
  11. Smith, A. et al.(2006), Seafarer Fatigue the Cardiff Research Programme, Cardiff University UK.
  12. USCG(1996), "Procedures for Investigating and Reporting Human Factors and Fatigue Contributions to Marine causalties", Report No. CG-D-09-97, pp. 1-25.
  13. USCG(1998), "Crew Fatigue and Performance on U.S. Coast Guard Cutters", Report No. CG-D-10-99, pp. 1-31.
  14. Yang, W. J.(2004), "Study on the Fatigue Factor as a Cause of Human Error", Journal of Korea Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 10, No, 2, pp. 1-6.