The Effects of Robo-horseback Riding with Changes of Pelvic Tilting and Speeds on Muscle Activities of Trunk and Lower Limb

승마기구에서 골반자세와 속도가 몸통 및 다리 근 활성에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Jung-Hyun (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Chang, Soo-Kyung (Department of Physical Therapy, Ansan University)
  • Received : 2014.09.11
  • Accepted : 2014.10.17
  • Published : 2014.10.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of robo-horseback riding with changes of pelvic tilting and speeds on muscle activities of trunk and lower limb in healthy adults. Methods: Thirty healthy adults were recruited for this study. Subjects performed robo-horseback riding at three pelvic postures (anterior tilting pelvic posture: AP, neutral pelvic posture: NP, posterior pelvic posture: PP) and different speeds (moderate and fast speed). Muscle activities were recorded from the trunk muscles (rectus abdominis [RA], T2 paraspinalis [T2 PS], L2 paraspinalis [L2 PS]) and lower limb muscles (rectus femoris [RF], vastus medialis [VM], vastus lateralis [VL], biceps femoris [BF], gastrucnemius [GCM]). Results: Significantly higher RA activities were observed under the PP condition than under the AP and NP conditions at both speeds. Significantly higher L2 PS activities were observed under the AP condition than under the PP and NP conditions at both speeds. Significantly higher T2 PS activities were observed under the AP condition than under the PP and NP conditions at fast speed. However, the muscle activities of the VM and GCM did not show significant changes with changes in pelvic posture at both speeds. All muscle activities were significantly higher under the fast speed than under the moderate speed in three pelvic postures. Conclusion: There were significant differences in the changes of pelvic tilting on muscle activities of trunk and lower limb were observed in healthy adults. NP condition can be introduced the most efficienct posture for muscle activities of trunk and lower limb in robo-horseback riding.

Keywords

References

  1. Benda W, McGibbon NH, Grant KL. Improvements in muscle symmetry in children with cerebral palsy after equineassisted therapy (hippotherapy). J Altern Complement Med. 2003;9(6):817-25. https://doi.org/10.1089/107555303771952163
  2. Kim HS, Lee KW, Hwang JH et al. Therapeutic effects of horseback riding on motor development of children with cerebral palsy. J Kor Sports Med. 2005;23(3):278-83.
  3. Jung JH, Yu JH. The effects of hippotherapy over 8 weeks on trunk proprioception, stability and posture in cerebral palsy patients. . J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(5):63-70.
  4. Kang HK, Chang SK. The effect of robo-horseback riding exercise on trunk muscle activity ratios in patients with low back pain. J Korean Soc Phys Ther 2012;24(6):393-7.
  5. Debuse D, Gibb C, Chandler C. Effects of hippotherapy on people with cerebral palsy from the users' perspective: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25(3):174-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980902776662
  6. Sterba JA. Does horseback riding therapy or therapist-directed hippotherapy rehabilitate children with cerebral palsy? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(1):68-73.
  7. Siebenga J, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ et al. Spine fractures caused by horse riding. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(4):465-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1012-5
  8. Han JY, Kim JM, Kim SK et al. Therapeutic effects of mechanical horseback riding on gait and balance ability in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012;36(6):762-9. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.6.762
  9. Bae SS, Kim TY, Bae JH. A comprehensive kinematic approach to pelvis. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 1999;11(2):93-102.
  10. Kim BJ. The study on difference of gait asymmetry ratio according to static pelvic inclination level in hemiplegic patient. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2006;18(3):1-7.
  11. Ryew CC. Kinematic analysis on the stabilization & correction effects of riding posture according to rider's skill levels in horse back riding. Korean J Sport Bio. 2012;22(1):83-94. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2012.22.1.083
  12. Keshner EA. Head-trunk coordination during linear anteriorposterior translations. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(4):1891-901.
  13. Lee DR, Lee NG, Cha HJ et al. The effect of robo-horseback riding therapy on spinal alignment and associated muscle size in MRI for a child with neuromuscular scoliosis: an experimenterblind study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):23-7.
  14. Jung JH, Kim JT. Comparative analysis on muscle function and EMG of trunk and lower extremity in short and long distance athlete. Korean J Sport Bio. 2012;22(1):9-16. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2012.22.1.009
  15. Song MS, Kang TW, Kim SM et al. Effects of mechanical horseback riding training on trunk control and balane function in stroke patients. J Digital Policy & Managem. 2013;11(12):487-94.
  16. Li X, Sang DC, Piao CH. Effects of mechanical horseback riding on balance ability in stroke patients. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2009;11:1051-3.
  17. Bruhm S, Kullmann N, Golhofer A. Combinatory effects of high-intensity-strength training and sensorimotor training on muscle strength. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(5):401-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865750
  18. Cho HG, Jung TW, Kwon MS. Effects of the 12 weeks horse riding exercise on a capacity for locomotion of a body and bilateral balance and trunk sway velocity in elementary and middle school student during the sit-to-stand. Korean J Sports Bio. 2013;23(1):37-43. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2013.23.1.037
  19. Han SC, Chu HG, Lee SH. The effects of horseback riding on the balance improvement of the children with cerebral palsy Korean J Phys Edu. 2004;43(2):601-10.
  20. Massion J, Ioffe M, Schmitz C et al. Acquisition of anticipatory postural adjustments in a bimanual load-lifting task: normal and pathological aspects. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128(1-2):229-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050842
  21. Almeida GL, Carvalho RL, Talis VL. Postural strategy to keep balance on the seesaw. Gait Posture. 2006;23(1):17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.020