DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hedging effectiveness of KOSPI200 index futures through VECM-CC-GARCH model

벡터오차수정모형과 다변량 GARCH 모형을 이용한 코스피200 선물의 헷지성과 분석

  • Kwon, Dongan (Department of Statistics, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Lee, Taewook (Department of Statistics, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 권동안 (한국외국어대학교 통계학과) ;
  • 이태욱 (한국외국어대학교 통계학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.29
  • Accepted : 2014.11.09
  • Published : 2014.11.30

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a hedge portfolio based on futures of underlying asset. A classical way to estimate a hedge ratio for a hedge portfolio of a spot and futures is a regression analysis. However, a regression analysis is not capable of reflecting long-run equilibrium between a spot and futures and volatility clustering in the conditional variance of financial time series. In order to overcome such defects, we analyzed KOSPI200 index and futures using VECM-CC-GARCH model and computed a hedge ratio from the estimated conditional covariance-variance matrix. In real data analysis, we compared a regression and VECM-CC-GARCH models in terms of hedge effectiveness based on variance, value at risk and expected shortfall of log-returns of hedge portfolio. The empirical results show that the multivariate GARCH models significantly outperform a regression analysis and improve hedging effectiveness in the period of high volatility.

본 논문에서는 기초자산의 선물을 이용하는 헷지 전략을 연구하였다. 최적헷지비율을 구하기 위한 전통적인 방법으로 회귀분석이 사용되고 있으나, 현물과 선물 사이에 존재하는 장기균형관계와 금융 시계열 자료의 분산에 존재하는 변동성 군집현상 등의 특징을 설명하지 못하는 한계가 있다. 이를 극복하기 위해 코스피200 지수와 선물 자료에 대해 평균모형으로 벡터오차수정모형을 적합하고, 분산모형으로 다변량 GARCH 모형을 적합하여 분산-공분산 행렬을 추정하고, 이를 통해 최적헷지비율을 구하는 방법을 연구하였다. 실증분석 결과에 의하면 시장이 안정적일 때에는 회귀분석을 사용해도 큰 차이가 없지만, 시장이 불안정해지고 변동성이 커지는 구간에서는 벡터오차수정모형과 다변량 GARCH 모형을 이용하는 경우에 헷지성과가 월등히 좋아지는 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modeling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates : A multivariate generalized ARCH model. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 498-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358
  2. Brooks, C., Henry, O. T. and Persand. G. (2002). The effect of asymmetries on the optimal hedge ratios. Journal of Business, 75, 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/338484
  3. Carchano, O. and Pardo, A. (2008). Rolling over stock index futures contracts. Journal of Futures Markets, 29, 684-694.
  4. Cho, S. H. and Oh, K. J. (2013). Using correlated volume index to support investment strategies in Kospi200 future market. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 24, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.2.235
  5. Ederington, L. (1979). The hedging performance of the new futures markets. Journal of Finance, 34, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1979.tb02077.x
  6. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of U. K. inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987-1008. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
  7. Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
  8. Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-intergration and error correction:Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  9. Hull, J. (2014). Options, futures and other derivatives, 9th Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  10. Johnson, L. (1960). The theory of hedging and speculation in commodity futures. Review of Economic Studies, 27, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296076
  11. Kang, S. H. and Yoon, S. M. (2011). Volatility spillover between the KOSPI 200 spot and futures markets using the VECM-DCC-GARCH model. Korean Journal of Futures and Options, 3, 233-249.
  12. Kim, K. S. and Yi, Y. (2009). A study on the lead-lag relationships between spot and futures of KOSPI200 using VECM and multivariate GARCH. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 4, 1991-2015.
  13. Kim, S. C., Seol, B. M. and Do, Y. H. (2007). The asymmetric volatility of KOSPI 200 futures and hedging performance. Korean Journal of Money & Finance, 4, 167-190.
  14. Kim, T. H., Lim, S. Y. and Park, K. J. (2008). A study on the long-run equilibrium between KOSPI 200 index spot market and futures market. The Korean Journal of Financial Management, 25, 111-130.
  15. Kroner, K. and Sultan, J. (1993). Time-varying distributions and dynamic hedging with foreign currency futures. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28, 535-551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331164
  16. Lee, J. H. and Jang, G. Y. (2001). Hedging strategies with the KOSPI 200 futures. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 28, 379-417.
  17. Lien, D., Tse, Y. K. and Tusi, A. K. C. (2002). Evaluating the hedging performance of the constant correlation GARCH model, Applied Financial Economics, 12, 791-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100110046045
  18. Murray, M. P. (1994). A drunk and her dog: An illustration of cointegration and error correction. The American Statistician, 48, 37-39.
  19. Nakatani, T. (2010). Four essays on building conditional correlation GARCH models, Ph. D Thesis, The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.
  20. Nakatani, T. and Terasvirta, T. (2008). Positivity constraint on the conditional variance in the family of conditional correlation GARCH models. Finance Research Letters, 5, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2008.02.001
  21. Salvador, E. and Arago, V. (2014). Measuring the hedging effectiveness of index futures contracts: Do dynamic models outperform static model? A regime-switching approach. Journal of Futures Markets, 34, 374-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21598

Cited by

  1. Wild bootstrap Ljung-Box test for autocorrelation in vector autoregressive and error correction models vol.29, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2016.29.1.061
  2. The GARCH-GPD in market risks modeling: An empirical exposition on KOSPI vol.27, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.6.1661
  3. Time series models based on relationship between won/dollar and won/yen exchange rate vol.27, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.6.1547
  4. DTW를 이용한 패턴 기반 일중 price momentum 효과 분석 vol.28, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.4.819