DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Deduction on The Problems and Improve The Way of The Successful Bidder Determination Method for Turnkey·Alternative Bid Construction

턴키·대안입찰공사 낙찰자 결정방식의 문제점 및 개선 방안 도출

  • 박홍태 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 이양규 (대림대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2014.04.09
  • Accepted : 2014.09.03
  • Published : 2014.12.01

Abstract

Full system of turnkey deliberation committee in 2010 was abolished and permanent Deliberation committee was introduced. So far, ordering organization selected the best method suitable for the design and comprehensive evaluation method in the turnkey bid construction. Comprehensive evaluation method have bid price design score coordination, weighted basis, the best design approach fixed amount, five successful bidder decision method in addition. Design deliberation branch committee in the successful bidder decision way configured and operated branch members of special design consultation committee, But main agent changed from committee deliberation pull system to permanent committee deliberation, as well as and The lobby burden was not improved. This similar to the past at the portion of the design deliberation and the way of the design deliberation in the turnkey bid construction. Therefore it is necessary to improve the design deliberation system. In other words, design score and technology competition should be adapted to determine a successful bid. This study suggested the operating system of the design deliberation, the decision method problems of the successful bidder and ways to improve the design deliberation.

2010년부터 턴키심의위원 풀 제도를 폐지하고, 상설심의위원 제도를 도입하여 현재까지 턴키입찰공사는 설계적합최적가방식, 종합평가방식으로서는 입찰가격, 설계점수조정, 가중치기준, 확정금액최상설계방식의 5가지 낙찰자 결정방식으로 선정하고 있다. 또한 낙찰자 결정방식으로서 설계심의분과위원회를 크게 중앙 지방 특별 설계자문위원회의 분과위원으로 구성하여 운영하고 있으나, 아직 로비 부담에 대해서 개선되지 못한 것은 심의위원 풀제에서 상설심의위원으로 심의 주체만 변경되었을 뿐, 턴키입찰에서 설계심의가 가지는 비중과 설계심의방식도 과거와 유사하기 때문이다. 그러므로 가격경쟁을 부분적으로 강화하여 설계점수가 낙찰을 좌우하는 풍토를 개선하고, 기술경쟁은 영업력보다 실질적인 기술력이 경쟁력을 가질 수 있도록 설계심의제도를 개선하는 것이 필요하다. 이에 이 연구는 낙찰자 결정방식의 설계심의 운영제도와 문제점 그리고 개선된 설계심의방안을 제시하였다.

References

  1. Adrian, J. J. (1981). The construction management process, Reston Publihing Co. Inc.
  2. AL Sinan, Fouad Mansoor (1986). Valuation of construction management contracts in developing contries, Ph.D Thesis, Purdue Univ.
  3. Cheon, L. (2010). Construction economics, Public Procurement Service.
  4. Construction & Economy Research Institute (2011). Turnkey alternative bid accept ratio, Resources (in Korean).
  5. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2009(a).
  6. Jang, H.-S. et al. (2012). "A study on strategies for enhancing transparency of domestic construction industry through foreign cases." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, No. 3, pp. 235-237 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2012.32.5C.231
  7. Lee, S.-H. (2005). Turnkey alternative tendering market trends, Construction Industry Institute (in Korean).
  8. Lee, S.-H. (2004). The correlation .of the government construction pass rate and profitability, Construction and Transportation, pp. 50-57 (in Korean).
  9. Lee, Y.-K. and Kang, L.-S. (2007). "Improvement of bidding procedure and design review system of turnkey and alternative-design contracts." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, No. 2, pp. 491-497 (in Korean).
  10. Lee, Y.-K., Kang, L.-S., Park, J.-H. and Jeon, S.-C. (2005). "Improvement of turn-key contract system through the analysis of present ordering condition in civil engineering projects." Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, No. 8, pp. 460-469 (in Korean).
  11. Lee, Y.-K. and Park, H.-T. (2011). "Improvement of procedures on design deliberation system for turnkey and alternative-design contracts." Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, No. 14, pp. 31-38 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2011.14.1.31
  12. Lee, Y.-S. (2011). Turnkey bid adequacy, Korean Construction News (in Korean).
  13. Ministry of Land (2014) The technical proposal review and evaluation manual bidding for basic, Detailed Design Technology Offers.
  14. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009(a)). Business tips on turnkey alternative bid Institution (in Korean).
  15. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009(b)). Criteria of large-bidding method deliberation, Technology Security Administration, The Construction Environment (in Korean).
  16. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2009(c)). Batch bid designed eligible deliberation and evaluation plan, Iechnology Security Administration, The Construction Environment (in Korean).
  17. Molenaar, K. R. (1999). "Public-Sector design/build evolution and performance." Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 54-62
  18. Park, H.-T. and Lee, Y.-K. (2013). "Orders status analysis on the successful decision method of turnkey alternative tendering construction." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 771-780 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.771
  19. Technology Security Administration. The construction environment (in Korean).