Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of cathepsin-K, RANKL, and OPG around standard, short, and mini dental implants after prosthodontic loading

  • Alan, Raif (Department of Periodontology, Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Marakoglu, Ismail (Department of Periodontology, Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Haliloglu, Seyfullah (Department of Biochemistry, Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2015.08.08
  • Accepted : 2015.10.08
  • Published : 2015.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the high success rates of endosseous dental implants, their placement is restricted according to the height and volume of bone available. The use of short or mini dental implants could be one way to overcome this limitation. Thus, this study aimed to compare standard, short, and mini dental implants with regard to associated clinical parameters and peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) levels of cathepsin-K (CTSK), RANK ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG), after prosthodontic loading. Methods: A total of 78 non-submerged implants (Euroteknika, $Aesthetica^{+2}$, Sallanches, France) were installed in 30 subjects (13 male, 17 female; range, 26-62 years) who visited the clinic of the Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University. Sampling and measurements were performed on the loading date (baseline) and 2, 14, and 90 days after loading. Assessment of the peri-implant status for the implant sites was performed using the pocket probing depth (PPD), modified plaque index, modified gingival index, modified sulcular bleeding index, and radiographic signs of bone loss. PICF samples collected from each implant were evaluated for CTSK, RANKL, and OPG levels using the ELISA method. Keratinized tissue and marginal bone loss (MBL) were also noted. Results: Clinical parameters statistically significantly increased in each group but did not show statistical differences between groups without PPD. Although implant groups showed a higher MBL in the upper jaw, only the standard dental group demonstrated a statistically significant difference. At 90 days, the OPG:sRANKL ratio and total amounts of CTSK for each group did not differ from baseline. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, both short and mini dental implants were achieving the same outcomes as the standard dental implants in the early period after loading.

Keywords

References

  1. De Boever AL, Quirynen M, Coucke W, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non-susceptible patients: a prospective long-term study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1341-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01750.x
  2. Lee DZ, Chen ST, Darby IB. Maxillary sinus floor elevation and grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:918-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02239.x
  3. Lai HC, Si MS, Zhuang LF, Shen H, Liu YL, Wismeijer D. Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02452.x
  4. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:35-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x
  5. Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 x 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:930-7.
  6. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:394-405. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100506.x
  7. Hasan I, Heinemann F, Aitlahrach M, Bourauel C. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2010;55:341-50. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt.2010.049
  8. Bhardwaj S, Prabhuji ML. Comparative volumetric and clinical evaluation of peri-implant sulcular fluid and gingival crevicular fluid. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:233-42. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.5.233
  9. Kajale AM, Mehta DS. Interleukin-$1\beta$ level in peri-implant crevicular fluid and its correlation with the clinical and radiographic parameters. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:220-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.131331
  10. Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ. Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev 1999;20:345-57. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.20.3.0367
  11. Bartold PM, Cantley MD, Haynes DR. Mechanisms and control of pathologic bone loss in periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2010;53: 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00347.x
  12. Bostanci N, Ilgenli T, Emingil G, Afacan B, Han B, Toz H, et al. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of RANKL and OPG in periodontal diseases: implications of their relative ratio. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:370-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01061.x
  13. Li Z, Hou WS, Bromme D. Collagenolytic activity of cathepsin K is specifically modulated by cartilage-resident chondroitin sulfates. Biochemistry 2000;39:529-36. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi992251u
  14. Mogi M, Otogoto J. Expression of cathepsin-K in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52: 894-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.01.006
  15. Yamalik N, Gunday S, Uysal S, Kilinc K, Karabulut E, Tozum TF. Analysis of cathepsin-K activity at tooth and dental implant sites and the potential of this enzyme in reflecting alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 2012;83:498-505. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110232
  16. Takamiya AS, Goiato MC, Gennari Filho H. Effect of smoking on the survival of dental implants. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2014;158:650-3. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2013.037
  17. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  18. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309011240
  19. Algraffee H, Borumandi F, Cascarini L. Peri-implantitis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:689-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.020
  20. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1170-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x
  21. Manz MC. Factors associated with radiographic vertical bone loss around implants placed in a clinical study. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5:137-51. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.137
  22. Rakic M, Struillou X, Petkovic-Curcin A, Matic S, Canullo L, Sanz M, et al. Estimation of bone loss biomarkers as a diagnostic tool for peri-implantitis. J Periodontol 2014;85:1566-74. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140069
  23. Monov G, Strbac GD, Baron M, Kandler B, Watzek G, Gruber R. Soluble RANKL in crevicular fluid of dental implants: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:135-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00012.x
  24. Arikan F, Buduneli N, Kutukculer N. Osteoprotegerin levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 283-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01463.x
  25. Lang NP, Berglundh T; Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?--Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38 Suppl 11:178-81.
  26. Lu HK, Chen YL, Chang HC, Li CL, Kuo MY. Identification of the osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand system in gingival crevicular fluid and tissue of patients with chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 2006;41:354-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00883.x
  27. Yamalik N, Gunday S, Kilinc K, Karabulut E, Berker E, Tozum TF. Analysis of cathepsin-K levels in biologic fluids from healthy or diseased natural teeth and dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:991-7.
  28. Strbac GD, Monov G, Cei S, Kandler B, Watzek G, Gruber R. Cathepsin K levels in the crevicular fluid of dental implants: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:302-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00904.x
  29. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15.
  30. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-11.
  31. Tinsley D, Watson CJ, Ogden AR. A survey of U.K. centres on implant failures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:14-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00355.x
  32. Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. Prevalence of implant loss and the influence of associated factors. J Periodontol 2009;80: 1069-75. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080594
  33. Todescan S, Lavigne S, Kelekis-Cholakis A. Guidance for the maintenance care of dental implants: clinical review. J Can Dent Assoc 2012;78:c107.
  34. Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33:283-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00907.x
  35. Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:323-6.
  36. Martin W, Lewis E, Nicol A. Local risk factors for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:28-38.
  37. Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:292-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01275.x
  38. Hammerle CH, Glauser R. Clinical evaluation of dental implant treatment. Periodontol 2000 2004;34:230-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.003434.x