DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Qualitative Study on the Period-Specific Changes of Job Factors and Performance Features in Academic Libraries

질적 분석을 통한 대학도서관 업무의 시대별 수행 형태 및 요소 변화에 관한 연구

  • 조철현 (성균관대학교 삼성학술정보관 학술정보지원팀) ;
  • 노동조 (상명대학교 인문사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2015.11.29
  • Accepted : 2015.12.09
  • Published : 2015.12.30

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the period-specific changes (Library 1.0, Library 2.0, Library 3.0 Period) of job factors and performance features in academic libraries. For this, the study categorized an academic library's job into five dimensions: 1) library administration 2) collection development and management 3) information organization 4) information services and 5) information system development and management, After the categorized library's job was defined in detail, the Delphi survey was conducted twice on librarians and professors of library and information science. The result showed that there were many changes in job factors and performance features in academic libraries towards the period of library 2.0 characterized by user participation, sharing and openness and into library 3.0 characterized by social network and semantic web. Library 3.0 is likely to bring about a significant change in user services with ever changing technological advances stemming from library 2.0, such as mobile services, RFID and NFC etc. The finding of the study suggest that library systems need to be continually upgraded in the period of library 3.0.

본 연구는 대학도서관 업무의 수행 형태와 요소의 변화를 시대별(도서관1.0, 도서관2.0, 도서관3.0)로 파악하고자 하는 연구이다. 전술한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 대학도서관의 업무를 경영관리, 장서개발 및 관리, 자료조직, 이용서비스, 정보시스템 구축 및 관리의 5개 직무로 구분한 다음 각 직무별 세부 업무에 대하여 도서관 현장의 중견 사서 및 문헌정보학 분야의 교수들을 대상으로 2차례에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하였다. 연구의 결과, 대학도서관의 업무가 참여, 공유, 개방(도서관2.0 시대)을 넘어서 소셜 네트워크, 시맨틱(도서관3.0 시대)의 개념이 적용되면서 업무의 수행 형태 및 요소에도 많은 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 도서관2.0 시대에서 시작한 모바일, RFID, SNS, NFC 등 신기술의 발전에 따라 도서관3.0 시대에는 이용서비스에 대한 변화가 급격하게 이루어져서 이를 지원하는 도서관 시스템의 지속적인 업그레이드가 필요한 것으로 밝혀졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강정원, 김현희 (2013). 매쉬업을 이용한 대학도서관의 통합정보검색 현황 및 개선방안 연구. 제20회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 133-136. Kang, Jeong Won, & Kim, Hyun-Hee (2013). A Study on the Current Status and Improvement of Integrated Information Retrieval of University Digital Libraries Using Mashup. Proceedings of the 20th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 133-136.
  2. 김성원, 김정우 (2013). 이용자관점에서의 도서관 2.0 서비스 활용현황과 활성화 방안. 한국비블리아학회지, 24(2), 269-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.2.269 Kim, Sungwon, & Kim, Jeongwoo (2013). Current usage and proliferation of library 2.0 from user viewpoint: Focusing on folksonomy. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(2), 269-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.2.269
  3. 김수정 (2011). 도서관 2.0 확산에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회 학술대회 발표논집, 25, 209-225. Kim, Soojung (2011). A study on Diffusion of Library 2.0 Applications. Proceedings of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science Conference, 25, 209-225.
  4. 김신영 (2009). 직무분석을 통한 대학도서관 직무모형 개발 연구. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. Kim, Sin Young (2009). A study on the development of duty model based on the job analysis for Korean academic libraries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul Korea.
  5. 노동조, 조철현 (2011). 도서관 3.0 기반 서비스에 대한 대학도서관 사서의 인식에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 263-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.263 Noh, Dong-Jo, & Cho, Chul-Hyun (2011). A study of the awareness focusing on the library 3.0 for the academic librarians. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 263-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.263
  6. 노영희 (2010). 도서관 3.0의 개념과 서비스 모형에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(4), 283-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.283 Noh, Young Hee (2010). A study on library 3.0 concept and its service model. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 283-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.283
  7. 노영희 (2014). 차세대디지털도서관의 발전방향논의에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(2), 7-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.007 Noh, Young Hee (2014). A study suggesting the development direction of the next generation digital library. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(2), 7-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.007
  8. 변회균, 조현양 (2013). 국내 도서관의 소셜네트워크서비스 실태조사. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 44(4), 255-275. Byeon, Hoi-Kyun, & Cho, Hyun-Yang (2013). A study on the using of social network services of libraries in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4), 255-275.
  9. 이정미 (2012). 상황인식 컴퓨팅의 개념과 도서관 정보서비스에의 적용. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(1), 179-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.1.179 Lee, Jeong-Mee (2012). The concept of the context-aware computing and its application to the library information services. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(1), 179-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.1.179
  10. 조철현 (2014). 대학도서관 업무의 시대별 변천에 따른 특성 연구. 박사학위논문, 상명대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. Cho, Chul-Hyun (2014). A study on the characteristics of jobs in academic libraries in Korea according to different generations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sangmyung University, Seoul Korea.
  11. Aghaei, S., Nematbakhsh, M. A., & Farsani, H. K. (2012). Evolution of the world wide web:From web 1.0 to web 4.0. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijwest.2012.3101
  12. Ahmed, W., & Kesselman, M. (2015). Third generation of the web: Libraries, librarians and web 3.0. Library Hi Tech News, 32(4), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-11-2014-0100
  13. Arif, M., & Mahmood, K. (2012). The changing role of librarians in the digital world: Adoption of web 2.0 technologies by Pakistani librarians. The Electronic Library, 30(4), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211252184
  14. Boateng, F., & Liu, Q. Y. (2014). Web 2.0 applications' usage and trends in top US academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2013-0093
  15. Chan, H. C. (2015). Library 3.0 for public library. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(5), 741-753. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.85075
  16. Charnigo, L., & Barnett-Ellis, P. (2013). Checking out facebook.com: The impact of a digital trend on academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(1), 23-34.
  17. Chu, H., & Yang, S. (2012). Innovative semantic web services for next generation academic electronic library via web 3.0 via distributed artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
  18. Kim, Sin-Young, & Lee, Jee-Yeon (2011). A study on the development of Korean academic libraries' duty model based on the job analysis. Aslib Proceedings, 63(1), 76-100.
  19. Kim, Y., & Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: A knowledge management perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.003
  20. Kortelainen, T., Rohkimainen, S., Haapaniemi, M., Kronqvist-Berg, M., & Saraste, M. (2012). Virtual path and hame-wiki as examples of library 2.0 services in Finland. Library and Information Science, 6, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2012)0000006008
  21. Kwanya, T., Stilwell, C., & Underwood, P. G. (2013). Intelligent libraries and apomediators:Distinguishing between Library 3.0 and Library 2.0. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 45(3), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611435256
  22. Li, X. (2014). Exploration for construction of college library information service mode under the guidance of "mirroring consumers" theory. International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science, 22 November 2014, Taiyuan, China.
  23. Liu, Y. (2014). Meditations on the semantic net: Oriented library information service in cloud computing era. Netherlands: Springer.
  24. Nath, K., Dhar, S., & Basishtha, S. (2014). Web 1.0 to web 3.0-evolution of the web and its various challenges. International Conference on Optimization, Reliabilty, and Information Technology. 6-8 Feburary 2010, Manav Rachna International Univerisity, India.
  25. Neubert, J., & Tochtermann, K. (2012). Linked library data: Offering a backbone for the semantic web. Berlin: Springer.
  26. Noh, Y. (2015). Imagining library 4.0: Creating a model for future libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.020
  27. Okonedo, S., Azubuike, F. C., & Adeyoyin, S. O. (2013). A survey of the awareness and use of web 2.0 technologies by library and information professionals in selected libraries in South West Nigeria. International Journal of Library Science, 2(4), 61-68.
  28. Pandey, S. R., & Panda, K. (2015). Semantic solutions for the digital libraries based on semantic web technologies. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 61(4), 286-293.
  29. Shukla, A. (2014). Library 2.0 application in library services: A comparative study of Central Universities and Indian Institutes of Technology of India. Pre Seminar Proceedings on Opportunities and Challenges of the Institutional Library in Rural Areas, 200-209.
  30. Siddiqui, M., Fatma, S., & Verma, A. K. (2013). Journey of the world wide web: From web 1.0 to web 4.0. India: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University.
  31. Tripathi, M., & Kumar, S. (2010). Use of web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape. The International Information & Library Review, 42(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2010.10762864
  32. Warrier, N., Shivarama, J., & Angadi, M. (2015). Role of library and information professionals in web 3.0 era. Retrieved from http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/1944/1892
  33. Zapater, J. (2014). From web 1.0 to web 4.0: The evolution of the web. Proceedings of the 7th Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems: 2.
  34. Zhang, J. (2013). The analysis of library information service based on web 3.0. 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC), 26 and 27 August 2013, Zhejiang University, China.