DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Educational Implications for Pre-Service Science Teacher Training through the Comparative Analysis between 'Integrated Science' based on the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum and Educational Contents presented in the Pre-Service Science Teachers' Textbooks of the College of Education

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정 '통합과학'과 사범대학 예비 과학 교사 교육 내용의 분석을 통한 예비 과학 교사 교육에 대한 시사점

  • Received : 2015.12.16
  • Accepted : 2015.12.28
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine implications of pre-service science teacher training by analyzing science field integration and connection between learning content presented in 'Integrated Science' for high school students based on the 2015 revised science curriculum, and in pre-service science learning materials (textbooks) of the college of education. For this study, the 2015 revised 'Integrated Science' curriculum and 11 types of pre-service science teachers' learning materials related to physics, chemistry, biological science, and earth science were selected. The results were as follows. Most of the learning content presented in the 2015 revised 'Integrated Science' curriculum had integrated two or more science fields. Also, almost all learning content presented in the 2015 revised 'Integrated Science' curriculum were included in pre-service science teachers' education content, with educational content for chemistry introduced at the highest rate. The textbooks for pre-service science teachers had the most learning contents of 'Energy and Environment' domain of 'Integrated Science' for high school students. Accordingly, these results suggest that 'integrated science materials' should be developed for proper the curriculum implementation. Also, training courses for science teachers responsible for 'Integrated Science' are required. Furthermore, a revised curriculum for the college of education and a method to link with certification examinations for secondary school teachers are needed.

본 연구는 2015 개정 '통합과학' 교육과정에서 추출한 학습 내용에 대해 과학 분야 통합성 분석과 예비 과학 교사 교육 내용과의 연관성 분석을 실시하였다. 이를 통해 예비 과학 교사 교육에 대한 시사점을 고찰하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2015 개정 '통합과학' 교육과정과 물리학, 화학, 생명과학, 지구과학 분야에서 사용하는 11종 사범대학 예비 과학 교사 교재를 분석대상으로 선정하였다. 그 결과, 2015 개정 '통합과학' 교육과정의 학습 내용들은 비교적 과학 분야 통합성을 가진 것으로 나타났다. 또한 2015 개정 '통합과학' 교육과정에 제시된 학습 내용들은 모두 예비 과학 교사 교육 내용에 포함되었으며, 화학 분야의 교육 내용이 가장 높은 비율로 소개되었음이 확인되었다. 또한 예비 과학 교사들을 위한 교육 내용에는 '통합과학'의 '환경과 에너지' 영역 교육 내용들을 가장 많이 포함하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 위와 같은 내용을 종합했을 때, 새로운 교육과정이 제대로 실행되기 위해서는 본 교과를 가르칠 교사들을 위해 통합과학 관련 소재들과 다양한 연수과정이 개발되어 현장에 보급될 필요가 있다. 또한, 예비 과학 교사들을 위해 사범대학 교육과정 개편, 임용 체제와의 연계 방안 마련 등이 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Fullan, M., & Porfreat, A. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York, USA: Teachers College Press.
  2. Gang, H., Kim, E., Noh, S., Park, H., & Son, J., (2007). Integrated science education. PaJu, Gyeonggi: Korea Studies Information.
  3. Kang, K. (2009). Analysis of difficulties experienced by pre-service secondary science teachers in student-teacher practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(5), 580-591.
  4. Kim, N., Han, H., Hong, B., & Shim, K. (2012). Analysis of fusing science and STEAM factors of learning contents related to life science presented in high school 'science' and the connection between 'science' and 'life science I' or 'life science II'. Biology Education, 40(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.1.121
  5. Kim, N., & Shim, K. (2015). Educational implications of pre-service science teachers' education by analysis of connection between learning contents presented in the high school "Science" and in the pre-service science textbooks of college of education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education), 35(3), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0363
  6. Kim, S., & Chung, U. (2007). Creative human capital as future growth engine and educational innovation. Korean Economic Journal, 46(4), 187-214.
  7. Kim, S., & Kim, K. (2015). A study on conflicts that teachers experience in curriculum implementing. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 261-285.
  8. Kim, W. (2012). Building conceptual framework to bring up talents capable of creative fusion: From the perspective of fusion between science and technology and art. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, (11)1, 97-119.
  9. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity[KOFAC]. (2009). Trends in policy and education case analysis about domestic and foreign mathematics, science, and the creativity education.
  10. Korea National University of Education[KNUE]. (2009). Considerations on the science text books compilation and reference research. Korea National University of Education. Research results report.
  11. Kwon, N., & Ahn, J. (2012). The analysis on domestic research trends for convergence and integrated science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.265
  12. Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., Jung, C., Oh, H., & Nam, J. (2012). The effects of integrated science instruction : A Meta-analysis on scientific knowledge, scientific Inquiry ability, and science-related attitude. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 223-246.
  13. Lee, K., & Oh, E. (2012). A study on the perception of curriculum for cultivating students' creativity in secondary school. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 6(1), 45-68.
  14. Lee, I. (2008). Convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Godswin
  15. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2014). Main points of the general guidelines for 2015 liberal art and natural science integrated curriculum. Ministry of Education. Retrived from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.revise.board.view.do
  16. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015). 2015 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  17. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015). High school science curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  18. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST). (2009). High school science curriculum manual. Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  19. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST). (2010). Republic of Korea driven by creative person and advanced technology. 2011 Business report.
  20. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST). (2011a). Realizing advanced nation through the human resources superpower. 2012 Business report.
  21. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST). (2011b). National, authorized, admitted notice about elementary and junior high school textbook. Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  22. Noh, T., Kwon, H., Kim, H., & Park, S. (2000). A study on science teachers' perceptions of the 6th high school science curriculum and their practices. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(1), 20-28.
  23. Plucker, J., & Runco. M. (1999). Enhancement of creativityreativity. In M. A Runco & S. Pritzker(Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity(pp 669-675).
  24. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Shin, Y., & Choi, B. (2012). A survey on the management status and science teachers' perception of science in high school based on 2009 curriculum revision. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 32(10), 1599-1612.
  25. Shin, Y., & Han, S. (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM(Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
  26. Shim, K., Kim, H., & Park, Y. (2002). Analysis of inquiry activities presented in the 7th grade life science textbooks based on the 7th curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education). 22(3), 550-559.
  27. Shim, K. C., & Song, S, C. (2015). A study on the perception of science teachers about convergence "Science" for high school students by experiences of teaching and professional development. Biology Education, 43(2), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.2.158
  28. Song, J., & Na, J. (2015). Directions and issues of 2015 national science curriculum and their implications to science classroom culture. School Science Journal, 9(2), 72-84.
  29. Song, W. (2006). In search of post catch-up innovation system. Seoul: Science & Technology Policy Institute.
  30. Yang, C., Kwak, Y., Han, J., & Noh, T. (2013). Current status of teacher education curriculum and recruitment of general science teachers and ways to improve them as suggested by professors from the department of science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(2), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.345
  31. Yoon. H., Yoon, W., & Woo, A. (2011). High school science teachers' perceptions of the 2009 revised science curriculum and the science textbook. Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.3.757

Cited by

  1. Perception of Pre-service science Teachers for the Possibility of Common Science Majors’ Preparation of the 2015 Science Curriculum ‘Integrated Science’ and ‘Scientific Inquiry vol.55, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.55.4.201612.472
  2. 통합 주제로서의 시스템 개념에 대한 대학생들의 인식 분석 vol.37, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0077
  3. Analysis of Inquiry Activity Types in the Integrated Science Textbooks for High School Students vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.24
  4. Analysis of the Characteristics of High School Student Research Activities - Focused on the Prize-Winning Works in the Life Science Field of National Science Fair - vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.3.380
  5. 통합과학 실행에 대한 과학 교사의 인식 vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.2.187
  6. 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학II 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석 vol.43, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2019.43.1.43
  7. Analysis of the Program for Training Pre-service Earth Science Teachers: Focusing on College Curriculum vol.41, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2020.41.4.391
  8. 과학교육과 지속가능발전교육 접목 프로그램이 고등학생의 세계관에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.253