DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of Ammunition Box by Ergonomic Evaluation

  • Received : 2014.07.22
  • Accepted : 2014.11.21
  • Published : 2015.02.28

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate old and newly designed ammunition boxes from an ergonomic point of view. Background: The ammunition boxes made of wood, which are currently used by the military, have some difficulties such as corrosion and damage of ammunition, environmental pollution, and stock management. Also, damages to the wooden ammunition boxes take place frequently, because soldiers carry them manually. Method: Sixteen participants volunteered to randomly perform lifting, carrying, and side-by-side moving tasks with 4 different old and new boxes, respectively for the ammunitions of 5.56mm, 60mm, 81mm, and 105mm in diameter. The old boxes are made of wood and are currently used in the military, while the new boxes are made of plastics. The joint moments of the elbow, shoulder, back, and knee were measured by using a motion analysis system and force platforms. In addition, an electromyographic system was used to measure the forces of hand and wrist muscles. Results: In most tasks, new boxes caused less joint moments at the elbow and shoulder than old boxes, because the new boxes were lighter and smaller than the old boxes. New boxes also derived less hand and wrist muscle forces due to the provision of fixed hard handles rather than string handles. Conclusion: The ergonomically designed new boxes could reduce the physical stresses of soldiers manually handling ammunitions and be helpful for storage and reuse. Application: This study shows an ergonomic application example for product development and evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. Department of Defense, Design Criteria Standard: Human Engineering (MIL-STD-1472G), Washington, 2012.
  2. Hermens, H.J., Freriks, B., Merletti, R., Stegeman, D., Blok, J. and Rau, G., SENIAM: European Recommendations for Surface Electromyography, Enschede, The Netherlands: Roessingh Research and Development, 1999.
  3. Kim, S.Y., Study on the Safety of Manual Ammunition Handling, Master Thesis, Kyunggi University, 2001.
  4. Konz, S. and Johnson, S., Work Design: Industrial Ergonomics, Holcomb Hathaway, 301-330, 2000.
  5. Sanders, M.S. and McCormick, E.J., Human Factors in Engineering and Design, McGraw-Hill, 254-267, 1993.
  6. Wu, G., van der Helm, F.C., Veeger, H.E., Makhsous, M., Van Roy, P. and Anglin, C., ISB Recommendation on Definitions of Joint Coordinate Systems of Various Joints for the Reporting of Human Joint Motion. Part II: Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist and Hand, Journal of Biomechanics, 38(5), 981-992, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042