Child Studies in Asia-Pacific Contexts

한국아동학회 (Korean Association of Child Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How Children Acquire Language-specific Ways of Partitioning Space: Creating a Semantic Category System Using Semantic Primitives

  • 투고 : 2015.02.10
  • 심사 : 2015.02.25
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper reviews Grammatical Mapping theory, a recently proposed theoretical paradigm for understanding children's acquisition of syntax, and ventures to apply the theory to the acquisition of semantics. Particularly, we focused on the domain of space, and proposed how children might acquire a unique system of spatial words in their mother tongue. Based on our review of evidence, we propose that there may be universal semantic primitives that serve as foundations of word meanings. We also propose that children must learn their mother tongue's semantic category system of spatial relations, from real time data. Finally, we argue that children's learning of word meanings may involve creation of a theory that makes sense to the child, and that this process of theory creation is possibly guided by universal principles and parameters.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). Eight-and-a-half-month-old infants' reasoning about containment events. Child Development, 69, 636-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06234.x
  2. Allen, S., Ozyurek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006
  3. Antell, S. E. G., & Caron, A. J. (1985). Neonatal perception of spatial relationships. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 15-23.
  4. Baillargeon, R. (1994). How do infants learn about the physical world? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3,133-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770614
  5. Baillargeon, R. (2004). Infants' physical knowledge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 88-94.
  6. Baillargeon, R., Needham, A., & DeVos, J. (1992). The development of young infants' intuitions about support. Early Development and Parenting, 1, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/edp.2430010203
  7. Baldwin, D. A., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Word learning: A widow on early pragmatic understanding. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the Stanford child language research forum. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  8. Barrett, M. D. (1995). Early lexical development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp.362-392). Oxford: Blackwell.
  9. Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In D. M. Morehead & A. E. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 99-179). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  10. Bowerman, M. (1978). Systematizing semantic knowledge: Change over time in the child's organization of word meaning. Child Development, 49, 977-987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128737
  11. Bowerman, M. (1989). Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In M. L. Rice & R. L. Shiefelbusch (Eds.), The teachability of language (pp.133-169). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  12. Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp.385-486). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp.475-511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2003). Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp.387-428). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Bremner, G. J., & Idowu, T. C. (1987). Constructing favorable conditions for measuring the young child's understanding of the terms in, on and under. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548701000106
  16. Brown, R. (1958). Words and things: An introduction to language. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  17. Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145-176.
  18. Brugman, C. (1983). The use of body-part terms as locatives in Chalcatongo Mixtec. Studies in Mesoamerican linguistics. In A. Schlichter (Ed.), Survey of California and other Indian languages, 4 (pp.235-290). Berkeley, CA.
  19. Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp.264-293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. Carey, S. (1993). Ontology and meaning-Two contrasting views. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp.88-103). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  21. Casasola, M., & Cohen, L. (2002). Infant categorization of containment, support, and tight-fit spatial relationships. Developmental Science, 5, 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00226
  22. Casasola, M., Cohen, L., & Chiarello, E. (2003). Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development, 74, 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00562
  23. Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90033-Z
  24. Choi, S., & Casasola, M. (2005). Preverbal categorization of support relations. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
  25. Choi, S., & Hattrup, K. (2012). Relative contribution of perception/cognition and language on spatial categorization. Cognitive Science, 36, 102-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01201.x
  26. Choi, S., McDonough, L., Bowerman, M., & Mandler, J. M. (1999). Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories English and Korean. Cognitive Development, 14, 241-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00004-0
  27. Clark, E. V. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2, 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90010-8
  28. Clark, E. V. (1983a). Convention and contrast in acquiring the lexicon. In B. Seiler & W. Wannenmacher (Eds.), Concept development and the development of word learning (pp.67-89). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  29. Clark, E. V. (1983b). Meanings and concepts. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3, Cognitive development (pp.787-840). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  30. Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 15, 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012393
  31. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Clark, H., & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  33. Corrigan, R., Halpern, E., Aviezer, O., & Goldblatt, A. (1981). The development of three spatial concepts: In, on, under. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4, 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548100400402
  34. Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. (2006). Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 311, 381-384. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121739
  35. de Leon, L. (1999). Verb roots and caregiver speech in early Tzotzil acquisition. In B. A. Fox, D. Jurafsky, & L. A. Michaelis (Eds.), Cognition and function in language (pp.99-119). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Center for Language and Information.
  36. de Leon, L. (2001). Finding the richest path: Language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan). In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Dromi, E. (1979). More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: An analysis of Hebrew data. Journal of Child Language, 6, 547-562.
  38. Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Ervin, S. M., & Foster, G. (1960). The development of meaning in children's descriptive terms. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043327
  40. Furrow, D., Murray, P., & Furrow, M. (1986). Spatial term use and its relation to language function at two developmental stages. First Language, 6, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378600601604
  41. Gava, L., Valenza, E., & Turati, C. (2009). Newborns' perception of left-right spatial relations. Child Development, 80, 1797-1810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01368.x
  42. Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language, thought and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  43. Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2006). Baby wordsmith: From associationist to social sophisticate. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 30-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00401.x
  44. Halpern, E., Corrigan, R., & Aviezer, O. (1983). In, on, and under: Examining the relationship between cognitive and language skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 6, 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548300600203
  45. Hamilton, A., Plunkett, K., & Schafer, G. (2000). Infant vocabulary development assessed with a British Communicative Development Inventory: Lower scores in the UK than in the USA. Journal of Child Language, 27, 689-705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004414
  46. Hespos, S., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition, 78, 207-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00118-9
  47. Hespos, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430, 453-456. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02634
  48. Hespos, S., & Piccin, T. (2009). To generalize or not to generalize: Spatial categories are influenced by physical attributes and language. Developmental Science, 12, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00749.x
  49. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Hollich, G. (2000). An emergentist coalition model for word learning: Mapping words to objects is a product of the interaction of multiple cues. In R. M. Golinkoff, K. Hirsh-Pasek, L. Bloom, L. Smith, A. Woodward, N. Akhtar, M. Tomasello, & G. Hollich (Eds.), Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  50. Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65, (3, Serial No. 262).
  51. Johnston, J., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italina, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 6, 529-545.
  52. Landau, B. (1996). Multiple geometric representations of objects in languages and language learners. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp.317-363). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  53. Lust, B. (2012). Tracking universals requires grammatical mapping paradigm. Linguists of tomorrow: Selected papers from the First Cyprus Postgraduate Conference in theoretical and applied linguistics. Cambridge scholars publishing, UK. pp.105-130.
  54. Mandler, J. (1992). How to build a baby: II Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.587
  55. Mandler, J. M. (1996). Preverbal representation and language. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp.365-384). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  56. Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  57. Markman, E. M. (1991). The whole object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In J. P. Byrnes & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp.72-106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  58. McDonough, L., Choi, S., & Mandler, J. M. (2003). Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00514-5
  59. Meints, K., Plunkett, K., Harris, P. L., & Dimmock, D. (2002). What is 'on' and 'under' for 15-, 18- and 24-month-olds? Typicality effects in early comprehension of spatial prepositions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166352
  60. Narasimhan, B., & Bown, P. (2009). Getting the INSIDE story: Learning to talk about containment in Tzeltal and Hindi. In V. C. Mueller Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp.97-132). New York: Psychology Press.
  61. Needham, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1993). Intuitions about support in 4.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 47, 121-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90002-D
  62. Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York: Academic Press.
  63. Norbury, H., Waxman, S., & Song, H. (2008). Tight and loose are not created equal: An asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 109, 316-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019
  64. Park, Y., & Casasola, M. (under review). Plain or decorated? Object visual features matter in infant spatial categorization.
  65. Plumert, J. M., & Hawkins, A. M. (2001). Biases in young children's communication about spatial relations: Containment versus proximity. Child Development, 72, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00263
  66. Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hennon, E. A. (2006). The birth of words: Ten-month-olds learn words through perceptual salience. Child Development, 77, 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00869.x
  67. Quinn, P. (1994). The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. Child Development, 65, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131365
  68. Quinn, P., Cummins, M., Kase, J., Martin, E., & Weissman, S. (1996). Development of categorical representations for above and below spatial relations in 3- to 7-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 32, 942-950. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.942
  69. Saji, N., Imai, M., Saalbach, H., Zhang, Y., Shu, H., & Okada, H. (2011). Word learning does not end at fast-mapping: Evolution of verb meanings through reorganization of an entire semantic domain. Cognition, 118, 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.007
  70. Sinha, C. G., Thorseng, L. A., Hayashi, M., & Plunkett, K. (1994). Comparative spatial semantics and language acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and Japanese. Journal of Semantics, 11, 253-287. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/11.4.253
  71. Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (vol.2, pp.1157, 1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  72. Smith, L. B. (1999). Children's noun learning: How general learning processes make specialized learning mechanisms. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp.227-305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  73. Tomasello, M. (1987). Learning to use prepositions: A case study. Journal of Child Language, 14, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012745
  74. Tomasello, M. (2000). The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics, 10, 401-413. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.01tom
  75. Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. (1994). Learning words in nonostensitve context. Developmental Psychology, 30, 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.639
  76. Tomasello, M., & Farrar, J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57, 1454-1463. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130423
  77. Valian, V. (1986). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. Developmental Psychology, 22, 562-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.562
  78. van Geert, P. (1986). In, on, under: An essay on the modularity of infant spatial competence. First Language, 6, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378600601602
  79. Wang, S., Baillargeon, R., & Paterson, S. (2005). Detecting continuity violations in infancy: A new account and new evidence from covering and tube events. Cognition, 95, 129-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.11.001