DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사용자 중심의 기업정보시스템 운영성과 관리체계에 관한 사례연구

A Case Study on The User Oriented Management System for Enterprise Information Systems Operational Performance

  • 이용근 (동국대학교 서울캠퍼스 경영대학 경영정보학과) ;
  • 황경태 (동국대학교 서울캠퍼스 경영대학 경영정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2015.02.17
  • 심사 : 2015.03.25
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31

초록

This study aims to provide the results of a case study, based on the action research approach, in which an user-oriented management system for enterprise information systems operational performance is successful developed and applied. This study performs the research and summarizes the results by adopting 5-step approach of action research, i.e., diagnosing, action planning, action taking, evaluating and specifying learning. The most important lessons learned from the study include (1) operation performance measures should be established to be shared by the management and users; (2) evaluation and improvement activities should be performed continually; and (3) formula to calculate the measure should be evolved so that improvement initiatives can be identified. The results of the study are expected to provide the companies intending to develop a management system for enterprise information systems operational performance with the practical and useful information. In addition, it is expected to suggest the research results that can be utilized as a basis for future research in this area.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김재구, 손명호 "기업전략에 따른 기업성과 평가지표의 가중치 비교연구 : 한국의 제조산업을 중심으로", 인사관리연구, 제27권 제1호, 2003, pp. 59-84.
  2. 김효근, 이한희, 서현주 "성과측정연구의 새로운 도전-BSC를 넘어서", 식스시그마 연구소, 2003.
  3. 박무현, "BSC 성과지표간 인과관계 분석", 계명대학교 산업경제연구소 경영경제, 제38집 제1호, 2005, pp. 279-305.
  4. 박소현, 이국희, 구본재, 함유근, "정보화 투자비용 및 투자효과 : 국내 기업 현황 분석 및 실증 연구", Information System Review, 제8권 제3호, 2006, pp. 201-223.
  5. 박종구, "뉴미디어 채택 이론 커뮤니케이션 이해총서", 커뮤니케이션북스, 2013. 02. 25.
  6. 박진배, "공기업의 BSC 구축에 관한 연구 : 한국남부발전(주) 적용사례를 중심으로", 인하대학원 경영학과 석사학위논문, 2008. 02.
  7. 이국희, 박소현, 구본재, 이미영, "정보화 성과의 사전-사후평가 차이에 관한 사례연구", Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, 제19권 제2호, 2012, pp. 59-78.
  8. 이종석, "전사적 자원관리의 발전과정과 발전방향 제안", 한국정보기술과학논문집, 제6권 제3호, 2008, pp. 193-199.
  9. 임춘성, "기업정보화 방법론", 커뮤니케이션북스, 2007.
  10. 정철현, "정보시스템 사용자 만족도에 관한 실증적 연구", 한국행정연구, 제11권 제4호, 겨울호, 2002, pp. 96-115.
  11. 조근수, 안준모, 민형진, "토털 아웃소싱 환경 하에서 IT서비스 수준관리(Service Level Management) 프로세스 성숙도가 정보시스템 성공에 미치는 영향에 관한 분석적 사례연구", Asia Pacifics Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2013, pp. 21-39.
  12. 최종민, "상황변수와 회계정보시스템의 특성, 성과간의 관계연구", 박사학위논문, Department of Management Science, 1992.
  13. Alter, Steven, "The Siamese Twin Problem : A Central Issue Ignored by 'Dimension of the Information System Effectiveness", Communications of AIS, Vol. 2, No. 20, 1999, pp. 40-60.
  14. Baburoglu, O. N. and Ravn, I., "Normative Action Research", Organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1992, pp. 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300104
  15. Bacon, C. J., "The Use of Decision Criteria in Selecting Information Systems/Technology Investments", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1992, pp. 335-353. https://doi.org/10.2307/249532
  16. Bannister, F. and Remenyi, D., "Acts of Faith : Instinct, Value and IT Investment Decisions", Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 15, 2000, pp. 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960050153183
  17. Bardhan, I., Bagchi, S., and Sougstad, R., "Prioritizing a Portfolio of Information Technology Investment Projects", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2004, pp. 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045803
  18. Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. D., "Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems : Making IS Research Relevant to Practice-Foreword", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2004, pp. 329-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148642
  19. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., and Mead M., "The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3(Sep., 1987), pp. 369-386. https://doi.org/10.2307/248684
  20. Blake Ives, Olsoh, and Jack J. Baroui, "The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 10, 1983, pp. 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1145/358413.358430
  21. Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., and Kock, N., "Principles of Canonical Action Research", Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2004, pp. 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x
  22. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., "Information Systems Success : The Quest for the Dependent Variable", Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1992, pp. 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  23. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., "The Delone and Mclean Model of Information Systems Success : A Ten-year Update", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2003, pp. 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  24. Erickson, J., "The Total Economic Impacts of Network Appliance's Solution relating to Business Continuance", Giga Information Group Whitepaper, 2002, pp. 121-132.
  25. Grembergen, W. Van and Timmerman, D., "Monitoring the IT Process through the Balanced Score Card", Proceedings of the 9th Information Resources Management (IRMA) International Conference, Boston, May 1998, pp. 105-116.
  26. Iman, A. and Siew, H. O., "Project Management Practices : The Criteria for Success or Failure", Communications of the IBIMA, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 234-241.
  27. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., "The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, 1992, pp. 71-79.
  28. Lewin, K., "Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers", Harper and Row, New York, 1951.
  29. Li, Jingyue, Stalhane, Tor, Kristiansen, J. M. W. and Conradi, R., "Cost Drivers of Software Corrective Maitenance : An Empirical Study in Two Companies", 26th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance in Timisoara, Romania, 2010.
  30. Olson, M. and Ives, B., "User Involvement in System Design : An Empirical Test of Alternative Approaches", Center for Digital Economy Research Stem School of Business Working Paper, IS-81-29.
  31. Omnext, "How to Save on Software Maintenance Costs", Omnext white paper, March 2010.
  32. Parker, M. M., Benson, R. J., and Trainor, H. E., "Information Economics : Lnking Business Performance to Information Technology", Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.
  33. Roberts John P., "Sample IT Satisfaction Questions", Gartner, Vol. 11, June 2010.
  34. Pressman, R. S.,"Software Engineering A Practitioner's Approach-Seventh Edition". McGrawHi Higher Education, 2010, pp. 4-7.
  35. Smithson, S. and Hirschheim, R., "Analysing Systems Evaluation : Another Look at an Old Problem", European Journal of information Systems, 1998, pp. 158-174.
  36. Sommerville, I., "Software Engineering : 9th edition", Edwards Brothers, 2011, pp. 244-248
  37. Stringer, E. T., Action Research, Sage, 2007.
  38. Susman, G. I. and Evered, R. D., "An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, 1978, pp. 582-603. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392581
  39. Swanson, E. and Burton, E. D., "System Life Expectancy and the Maintenance Effort : Exploring their Equilibration", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2000, pp. 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250939
  40. Tallon, P. P., Kraemer, K. L., and Gurbaxani, V., "Executives' Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology : A Process-oriented Approach", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2000, pp. 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518269
  41. Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., and Hoffer, J. A., "Essentials of Systems Analysis AND Design", 5th Edition, Pearson Education Inc., 2012.
  42. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H., "Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on interventions", Decision Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2008, pp. 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  43. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D., "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, 2000, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  44. William, J. D. and Gholamreza, T., "The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction", MIS Quarteriy, 1988, pp. 259-274.
  45. Zmud, R., "Editor's Comments", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1998, pp. xxxix-xxxii.