대한건축학회논문집:구조계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction)

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.13-20
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1226-9107(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1788(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

P-M 상관도를 이용한 축하중과 폭발하중을 동시에 받는 철근 콘크리트 기둥의 손상도 평가

Damage Assessment of Neinforced Concrete Column under Combined Effect of Axial Load and Blast Load by Using P-M Interaction Diagram

  • 투고 : 2014.11.18
  • 심사 : 2015.03.16
  • 발행 : 2015.04.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, the damage contour of reinforced concrete columns under blast load was compared with its P-M interaction diagram to evaluate the simplified analysis for blast resisting performance of reinforced concrete column. Autodyn which was specialized for analysis of explosion and impact was used to simulate the structural behavior of the columns under combined effect due to axial and blast loading. The weight of explosive is fixed on most threatening weight, 20kg, and distance of explosive is varied from 1m to 5m. According to the analysis, the damage contour of reinforced concrete column showed very similar shape to P-M interaction diagram as its axial load and blast induced additional bending moment changes. Therefore, the damage and failure behavior of reinforced concrete column can be predicted from damage contour on P-M interaction diagram.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Longinow, A. and Mniszewski, K.R., Protecting Buildings Against Vehicle Bomb Attacks, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 1, No. 1, p.p. 51-54., 1996 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1996)1:1(51)
  2. Corley, W.G., Mlakar Sr., P.f., Sozen, M.A., and Tornton, C.H., "The Oklahoma City Bombing: Summary and Recommendations for Multihazard Mitigation,", Jornal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 12, No. 3, p.p. 100-112., 1998. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1998)12:3(100)
  3. Aldo M., Kirk M., Manuel D., Alternate Path Method in Progressive Collapse Analysis, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 17., p.p. 152-160, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000126
  4. GSA. Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modemization Projects, The U.S. General Services Administration, Washington, D. C., 2003
  5. DoD. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) - Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, Department of Defence, Washington, D. C., 2005
  6. Shi Y. and Hao H. and Li Z., Numerical Derivation of Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Prediction of RC Column Damage to Blast Loads, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 35, p.p. 1213-1227, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.09.001
  7. Mutalib A. and Hao H., Development of P-I Diagrams for FRP Strengthed RC Columns, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 38, p.p. 290-304, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.029
  8. Wu K. Li B. Tsai K., Residual Axial Compression Capacity of Localized Blast-Damaged RC Columns, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 38, p.p. 29-40, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.09.002
  9. Zukas J A., Introduction to Hydrocodes, Elsevier, UK, p.p. 313, 2004.
  10. Smith P.D., Hetherington J.G., Blast and Ballistic Loading of Structure, Laxton's, Great Britain, p.p. 336.
  11. Cormie, David & Mays, Geoff & Smith, Peter, Blast Effects on Buildings, 2nd edition, Thomas telford, UK, p.p. 338, 2009.
  12. Kingery, C. N. and Bulmash, G., Airblast Parameters from TNT Spherical Air Burst and Hemispherical Surface Burst Technical Report ARBRL-TR-02555, US Army Research and Development Centre, 1994.
  13. IATG, International Ammunition Technical Guideline, UN SaferGuard, 1st edition, p.p. 4-6., 2013.
  14. Biggs, John M., Introduction to Structural Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, NY, p. 341, 1964.
  15. Russell C. H., Structural Analysis 7th edition, Prentice Hall, p. 666, 2009.
  16. Nystrom U. and Gylltoft K,. Numerical Studies of The Combined Effects of Blast and Fragment Loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 36, p.p. 995-1005, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.008
  17. Ansys, AUTODYN Theory Manual, Century dynamics, p.235, 2005.
  18. 김한수, 박재표, 전산해석을 이용한 CFT 기둥의 폭발저항성능 평가, 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, Vol. 27, No. 3, p.p. 65-72, 2010
  19. 김한수, 안효승, 철근콘크리트 부재의 폭발해석을 위한 침식 기준, 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, Vol. 30, No. 3, p.p. 21-28, 2014
  20. FEMA 452, Risk Assessment, A how to guide to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings, Department of Veterans Affairs, 2005.
  21. Nadim. H. M and Akthem. A, Structural Concrete Theory and Design, Wiley, 4th edition, p.p. 333-351. 2008.
  22. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TM 5-1300, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, U.S. Army corps of Engineers, Washington, D. C. 1990
  23. Bing L, Anand N, Qian K, Residual Axial Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Simulated Blast Damage, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 26, p. p. 287-299, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000210