DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flooding Tolerance of Cool-Season Turfgrass for the Revegetation of Waterside Slopes

수변 비탈면 녹화를 위한 한지형잔디의 내침수성 연구

  • Shim, Sang-Ryul (Department of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2015.02.26
  • Accepted : 2015.03.19
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

Cool-season turfgrass is a rapidly increasing of usage for the revegetation of waterside slopes in dams, lakes and rivers. The purpose of this research is to identify the flooding tolerance of cool-season turfgrass with respect to the flooding periods of 0(control), 2, 4 and 6 days, respectively. The surface coverage ratio, turfgrass injury and soil moisture content were measured to assess the flooding tolerance of cool-season turfgrass. The increase in the flooding periods with 4 and 6 days resulted in the lower surface coverage ratio for cool-season turfgrass while no significant difference was found in the 2 days flooding when compared to 0 day (the control plot) flooding plot. In case of the turfgrass injury and the soil moisture content, however, the higher values were found with the increase of flooding periods in 2, 4 to 6 days. We observed that the higher the turfgrass injury and soil moisture content increased, the lower the surface covrage ratio decreased. In these regards, we also observed that the tolerance of cool season turfgrass were high in the 2 days flooding condition, medium in the 4 days flooding condition and low in the 6 days flooding condition. The flooding tolerance of cool-season turfgrass was gradually weakened in over 2 days flooding periods due to $O_2$ deficiency in the anaerobic soil condition. Therefore, we could suggest cool-season turfgrass within 2 days flooding periods for the revegetation of waterside slopes in dams, lakes and rivers.

Keywords

References

  1. Beard, J. B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. Prentice-Hall, Inc. pp. 297-302.
  2. Carrow R. N..D. V. Waddington and P. E. Rieke 2001. Turfgrass Soil Fertility and Chemical Problems Assessment and Management. pp. 285-289.
  3. http://www.kma.go.kr/weather/climate
  4. Ham KS and Shim SR. 2015. Effects of Mixed Seeding of Main Revegetation Plants Treated with Different Seeding Amounts of Pennisetum alopecuroides on Cut-Slope Revegetation. J. Korean Env. Res. & Rev. Tech. 18(1): 1-11.
  5. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.2009. Design on Slopes Revegetation andTentative Instruction on Construction Work.
  6. Park JM. 2002. Comparing of Flooding Tolerance of Herbaceous Plants for Selecting Useful Revegetation Plants in Shoreline Slopes of Lake. J. Korean Env. Res. & Rev. Tech. 5(2): 25-33.
  7. Park JM and Choi GH. 2001. Study on the Flooding Tolerance of Some Woody Plants for Selecting Useful Revegetation Plants in Lakeand Marsh Slopes. J. Korean Env. Res. & Rev. Tech. 4(2): 45-51.
  8. Park MO.Koo BH.Joo SD and Kwon HJ. 2011. Experimental Study on the Flooding Tolerance of Woody Plants for Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystem in Vegetation Base (Mixed and Blended Yellow Soil) 2011 Spring Proceeding of Korean Env. Res. & Rev. Tech.: 141-142.
  9. Park SH.Park JM and Oh HK. 2008. Growth Characteristics of 4 Iris Species by Flooding Periods for Revegetation Plants Selection in Water Level Changing Slopes. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 22(6): 640-647.
  10. Shim SR and Kim JH. 2006. Vegetation Characteristics of Main Herbaceous Flowers for Ecological Restoration. The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology 9(1): 64-71.
  11. Shin SH.Kim MS and Kim YH. 2004. Effects of Soil, Water Level and Shading on Growth of Acorus calamus var. angustatus. Kor. J. Lands. Arch. 32(5): 63-72.
  12. Turgeon, A. J. 1991. Turfgrass Management, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, pp. 260-261.