응용통계연구 (The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics)

  • 제28권2호
  • /
  • Pages.221-230
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-066X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5818(eISSN)
한국통계학회 (The Korean Statistical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

감마 혼합 모형을 통한 반복 측정된 형제 쌍 연관 분석 사례연구

Gamma Mixed Model to Improve Sib-Pair Linkage Analysis

  • Kim, Jeonghwan (Department of Statistics, Inha University) ;
  • Suh, Young Ju (Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Inha University) ;
  • Won, Sungho (Department of Public Health Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Nah, Jeung Weon (Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Woojoo (Department of Statistics, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.16
  • 심사 : 2015.03.31
  • 발행 : 2015.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

전통적으로 반복 측정된 형제 쌍 연관 분석에서는 선형 혼합 모형이 사용되어 왔다. 그러나 그 모형은 관심있는 표현형과 연관된 유전자좌를 찾는 것에 있어서 검정력이 문제가 되는 것으로 지적되어 왔다. 본 연구에서 우리는 이러한 검정력 문제를 개선하는 방법으로 감마 혼합 모형을 고려하였고, 검정력과 제 1종 오류의 관점에서 선형 혼합 모형과 성능을 서로 비교하여 보았다. Genetic Analysis Workshop 13에서 제공된 자료를 이용하여 살펴본 결과, 감마 혼합 모형이 검정력에 있어서 큰 이득을 볼 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Traditionally, sib-pair linkage analysis with repeated measures has employed linear mixed models, but it suffers from the lack of power to find genetic marker loci associated with a phenotype of interest. In this paper, we use a gamma mixed model to improve sib-pair linkage analysis and compare it with a linear mixed model in terms of power and Type I error. We illustrate that the use of gamma mixed model can achieve higher power than linear mixed model with Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 data.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Almasy, L., Amos, C. I., Bailey-Wilson, J. E., Cantor, R. M., Jaquish, C. E., Martinez, M., Neuman, R. J., Olson, J. M., Palmer, L. J., Rich, S. S., Spence, M. A. and MacCluer, J. W. (2003). Genetic analysis workshop 13: Analysis of longitudinal family data for complex diseases and related risk factors, BMC Genetics, 4(Supple 1), S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S1
  2. Almasy, L. and Blangero, J. (1998). Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees, American Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 1198-1211. https://doi.org/10.1086/301844
  3. Barber, M. J., Cordell, H. J., MacGregor, A. J. and Andrew, T. (2004). Gamma regression improves Haseman-Elston and Variance Components Linkage Analysis for Sib-Pairs, Genetic Epidemiology, 26, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.10299
  4. Breslow, N. E. and Clayton, D. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 9-25.
  5. Haseman, J. K. and Elston, R. C. (9172). The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus, Behavior Genetics, 2, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066731
  6. Kruglyak, L. and Lander, E. (1995). Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits, American Journal of Human Genetics, 57, 439-454.
  7. Lee, Y., Nelder, J. A. and Pawitan, Y. (2006). Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects: Unified Analysis via h-Likelihood, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  8. Suh, Y., Park, T. and Cheong, S. (2003). Linkage analysis of longitudinal data, BMC Genetics, 4(Suppl I):S27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S27
  9. Won, S., Elston, R. C. and Park, T. (2006). Extension of the Haseman-Elston regression model to longitudinal data, Human Heredity, 61, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093519