DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Elementary School Teacher's Perspective of the Meaning of Communication and Cooperation with After-school Teachers

초등 교사의 방과후 돌봄 교사와의 의사소통과 협력에 대한 의미

  • 우진경 (숙명여자대학교 아동복지학부) ;
  • 서영숙 (숙명여자대학교 아동복지학부)
  • Received : 2015.01.31
  • Accepted : 2015.04.23
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

In this study, an analysis of the actual conditions and needs regarding elementary school teacher's levels of cooperation was conducted. This was done from the assumption that it is essential for good communication and cooperation to exist between elementary school teachers and after-school care teachers to provide the most reliable after-school care environment possible. Individual interviews with 6 elementary school teachers were conducted, and the results of the data analysis were as follows. First, the necessity for close communication and interaction between teachers was clearly established, due to the obvious advantages obtained from cooperation on supporting children and improving the teacher's levels of expertise. However, contrary to this, the elementary school teachers in fact did not have very good communication between themselves and the after-school care teachers. Second, the problems in cooperation revealed a degree of disapproval regarding the perceived independence of after-school care teacher's duties, a sense of burden arising from interaction with a large number of teachers, the lack of communication time due to the workload of elementary school teachers, and the lack of material resources. Third, teachers further stated that although they were generally interested in after-school care classes, and showed approval of the role of after-school care teachers, regular meetings, and an expansion of the current messenger systems of communication with after-school teachers are clearly needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Blue-Banning, M. J., Summers, J. A., Frankland, H. C., Nelson, L. L., & Beegle, G. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70, 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000203
  2. Bruner, C. (1991). Thinking collaborative: Ten questions and answers to help policy makes improve children's service. Washington D. C.; Education and Human Service Consortium.
  3. Bulach, C., Lunenburg, F. C., & Mccallon, R. (1994). The influence of the principal's leadership style on school climate and student achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  4. Choi, H. K. (2012). A Study on the Current State of Elementary Care Program. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Choi, K. I. (2011). The Effect of Principle's Leadership on Collaboration between School Social Workers and Teachers: The Mediating Effects of School Culture and Needs to School Social Work Services of Teachers. Social Science Research Review Kyungsung University. 27(1), 29-46.
  6. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1993). Educational leadership for teacher collaboration. In S. Bonnie(Ed.), Program Leadership for Serving Students with Disabilities, 421-444.
  7. Eo, S. M., & Lim S. T. (2013). The Relations of the Communication Ways among Teachers to Their Job Involvement with Teacher Efficacy as a Mediator. Journal of Educational Studies, 44(3), 77-106.
  8. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Reserch in Education Settings. New York: State University of New York Press.
  9. Hong, C. N. (2005). The structural relationship between school characteristics and teacher commitment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul University, Korea.
  10. Jeon, H. G., & H, D. D. (2007). A Study on Building a School Community for Learning Based on Teacher Meetings for Classroom Instruction. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24(3), 197-219.
  11. Jeong, S. S. (2011). The Effect of School Organizational Communication on organizational Commitment. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(4), 351-374.
  12. Jin, H. K. (2006). A Case Study on the Collaboration between School Welfare Workers and Teachers. Korea Youth Research, 13(4), 225-258.
  13. Jung, W. Y. (2005). The Effects of School Organizational Culture Perceived by Teachers on Their Teacher Efficacy and Organizational Commitment. The Journal of Educational Administration, 23(2), 73-90.
  14. Kim, B. Y. (2008). Effect of Elementary School Teachers' Perception of Level of Communication with Organizational Members on Job Satisfaction. Unpublished master's thesis, Konkuk University, Korea.
  15. Kim, H. J., & Kim, M. J. (2011). A Study on the Influence of School-based Teacher Collaboration on Teacher's Pracice in Implementing School Reform. The Journal of Educational Administraion, 29(3), 77-99.
  16. Kim, J. H & Choi, S. W. (2012). A Case Study of Special Education Teacher's Collaboration with Inclusive Class Teacher. Teacher Education Research., 51(3), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.51.3.201212.488
  17. Kim, K. J. (2014). A Study on the Current State of Elementary Care Program. Unpublished master's thesis, Busan National University of Education, Korea.
  18. Kim, M. J. (2012). Analysis on Communication Network in "S" Elementary School Teachers. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(4), 65-87.
  19. Kim, T. Y. (2012). Elementary School Teachers' Perceptions and Practices of Collaboration with Families of Students with Disabilities and Other Professionals. The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 1-26.
  20. Kougioumtzis, K., & Patriksson, G. (2009). School-based teacher collaboration in Sweden and Greece. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and practice, 15(1), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802661352
  21. Lee, H. J. (2011). A study on the actual conditions of the after-school elementary school's daycare class. Unpublished master's thesis, Busan National University of Education, Korea.
  22. Moon, H. N. (2010). A Study on the efficient Implementation of Elementary After-School Care Classes. Unpublished master's thesis, Hansung University, Korea.
  23. Rho, S. H. (2012). The Perceptions and Needs of Mother's in terms of Elementary School-Age Child Care: A Focus on the Working Mother. 19(3), 21-40.
  24. Santamaria & Thousand.(2004). Collaboration, co-teaching, and differentiated instruction: A process-oriented approach to whole schooling. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 1(1), 13-27.
  25. Shin, N. Y. (2009). The Correlation Between School Administrator Support and Job Satisfaction of Elementary After-school Educare Teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  26. Suh, Y. S., Suh, H. J., Park, J. O., & Rho, S. H. (2012). A Study on the Standardization of After-School Educare Teachers' Qualification and Guarantee of their Status in Elementary School. Korean Educational Development Institute.
  27. Suh, Y. S., Park, J. O., & Rho, S. H. (2014). A Study on the Improvement of After-School Educare Teacher's Status and Working Conditions. A Korean Journal of After-School Child Education, 11(1), 71-92.
  28. Yang, Y. Y. (2008). The Analysis of job satisfaction of elementary after-school teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Lifelong Education Korea National Open University, Korea.
  29. Yang, Y. Y., & Song, D. Y. (2009). The Analysis of Job Satisfaction of Elementary After School Teachers. A Korean Journal of After-School Child Education. 6(1), 17-40.
  30. Wayne, K. H., & Cecil, G. M. (2007). Educational Administration. Oh, Y., Shin, H., Yang, S., & Park, J.(translation). Seoul: Academi press. (Original published in 2009).
  31. Woo, S. J. (2011). A Study on Activation Methods for Operation of Elementary After-School Student Care Classes. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University Chung Buk, Korea.