The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education (한국간호교육학회지)

The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education (한국간호교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Course Outcome to Achieve Exit Outcome: Applying Hauenstein's theory

졸업성과 달성을 위한 교과목 학습성과 개발 : Hauenstein의 교육목표분류체계 적용

  • Received : 2015.02.10
  • Accepted : 2015.04.01
  • Published : 2015.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop course outcomes for nursing students by applying Hauenstein's theory. Methods: The research was conducted in three steps as follows: identifying exit outcomes related to the Adult Nursing course, developing Adult Nursing course outcomes based on the theory of Hauenstein, and finalizing Adult Nursing course outcomes. Results: Exit outcomes achievable in Adult Nursing were generated after a needs analysis survey among students, nurses and professors was conducted and subsequently reviewed by professors specializing in the subject. For theoretical courses, the level of the course outcomes was derived from the cognitive domain, whereas, for practical courses, it was derived, in stages, from the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains. Next, using taxonomical terms that can properly address the level of each domain, course outcomes for theoretical and practical courses were determined. After expert opinion was sought, the final course outcome for the Adult Nursing course was produced. Conclusion: The results are meaningful in that valid course outcomes were developed through the process described above and are expected to greatly contribute to reaching exit outcomes and strengthen the professional capacity of nursing students.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, L. W. (1981). Assessing affective characteristics in the school. Boston, Allyn and Bacon Inc.
  2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: book 1 Cognitive Domain. Longman Pub.
  3. Chenot, T. M. (2007). Frameworks for patient safety in the nursing curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(10), 559-568. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100730-02
  4. DiBartola, L. M., Miller, M. K., & Turley, C. L. (2001). Do learning style and learning environment affect learning outcome? Journal of Allied Health, 30(2), 112-115.
  5. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  6. Harden, R. M., Crosby, J. R., & Davis, M. H. (1999). AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 1-an introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979969
  7. Hauenstein, A. D. (1998). A conceptual framework for educational objectives: a holistic approach to traditional taxonomies (vol. 100): University Press of America Lanham, MD.
  8. Houlden, R. L., & Collier, C. P. (1999). Learning outcome objectives: a critical tool in learner-centered education. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 19, 208-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340190405
  9. Hsu, L. L., & Hsieh, S. I. (2013). Development and psychometric evaluation of the competency inventory for nursing students: a learning outcome perspective. Nurse Education Today, 33(5), 492-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.028
  10. Kim, H. S. (2012). Outcomes-based curriculum development and student evaluation in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(7), 917-927. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.7.917
  11. Kim, I. S., Park, Y. M., Lee, W. H., Choi, H. S., Kang, H. S., Choi, B. O., et al. (2004). A conceptual framework for educational objectives: a holistic approach to traditional taxonomies(A.D. Hauenstein, Trans). University Press of America Lanham, MD. (Original work published 1998).
  12. Kim, O. N. (2006). The comparative analysis of educational taxonomies in cognitive domain. The Korean Educational Review, 12(2), 165-189.
  13. Kim, S. (2012). The Concept and necessity of learning outcome. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 24(2), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.2.89
  14. Ko, J. K., Chung, M. S., Choe, M. A., Park, Y. I., Bang, K. S., Kim, J. A., et al. (2013). Modeling of nursing competencies for competency-based curriculum development. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 19(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.1.87
  15. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. (2012). Accreditation assessment standards for education of Korea (the course of the nursing bachelor's degree). Seoul: Korean Nurses Association.
  16. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: book 2 Affective Domain. Longman Pub.
  17. Lee, B. K. (2010). Study on the restructure of information literacy process based on taxonomy educational objectives. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.107
  18. Lee, H. J., Chung, S. K., & Kim, M. J. (2013). The effects of healthcare major students' educational achievement on life competencies. Journal of the Korean Society of School Health, 26(2), 62-71.
  19. Lee, K. W., & Shin, Y S. (2009). A study on the program operations based on the evaluation of program education objectives and program outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 12(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2009.12.2.71
  20. Oh, H. K., & Han, Y. I. (2011). Effects of simulation-based training on stress and self-efficacy in nursing students. Journal of the Korean Society of School Health, 24(1), 33-40.
  21. Park, K. M., & Lee, K. N. (2011). Case research on educational needs of engineering students about program outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 14(3), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2011.14.3.38
  22. Park, Y. I., Kim, J. A., Ko, J. K., Chung, M. S., Bang, K. S., Choe, M. A., et al. (2013). An identification study on core nursing competency. Journal of Korean Academy Society of Nursing Education, 19(4), 663-674. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.663
  23. Raup, G. H., King, J., Hughes, R. J., & Faidley, N. (2010). Using learning outcome measures to assess doctoral nursing education. Journal of Visualizes Experiments, 40, e2048, 1-3.
  24. Roh, H. R., Rhee, B. D., Lee, J. T., & Bae, S. K. (2012). Development of task-based learning outcomes according to clinical presentations for clinical clerkships. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 24(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.1.31

Cited by

  1. Planning and Applying Simulation-based Practice for the Achievement of Program Outcomes in Nursing Students vol.21, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.3.393
  2. 간호대학생의 시뮬레이션실습 기반 임상판단력과 흡인간호수행능력 vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.3.330
  3. Effect of Structured Debriefing on the Learning Outcomes of Nursing Students in Simulation-based Education vol.22, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2018.22.9.1208
  4. 간호학생의 성과기반교육 달성도에 미치는 영향 vol.5, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17703/jcct.2019.5.2.329
  5. 간호교육 프로그램 학습성과 간접측정도구의 활용을 위한 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증 vol.21, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2021.21.08.608