DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Establishment of Crossbreed and Comparison of Growing Performance for Commercial Korean Native Duck

토종 실용오리 생산을 위한 교배조합 설정 및 성장능력 비교

  • Heo, Kang-Nyeong (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hyuk (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Ho (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Bo-Seok (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Dae (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Bang, Han-Tae (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Cha, Jae-Beom (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hak-Kyu (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choo, Hyo-Jun (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Hong, Eui-Chul (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 허강녕 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 김지혁 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 김상호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 강보석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 김종대 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 방한태 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 차재범 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 김학규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 추효준 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 홍의철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과)
  • Received : 2015.03.24
  • Accepted : 2015.05.11
  • Published : 2015.06.19

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the performance of crossbreed Korean native ducks for production of Korean native commercial ducks which are adapted to Korean environment. A total of four hundred eighty ducklings (1-d-old) of crossbreds from A and B lines (derived from National Institute of Animal Science) were used in this work and divided into 8 treatments (4 replicates/group, 15 birds/replicate) with $4{\times}2$ factors (4 groups, AA, AB, BB, BA; 2 genders, male and female). Ducks were fed diets based on corn-soybean meal for 0 to 3 wk (22.0% [CP], 2,904 kcal/kg [ME]) and 3 to 8 wk (18.0% [CP], 3,002 kcal/kg [ME]). Body weight of AA group was higher than BB and BA groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on body weight at 8 wk old. Body weight gain of AB group was the highest among groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on body weight gain among crossbreds at 0~3, 3~8 and 0~8 wk old. On body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio, male was higher than female at the age of 3 and 8 wk old (P<0.05, P<0.01). There was no significant difference on uniformity and livability. However, production index of male was higher than that of female (P<0.01). These results may provide the basic data on growing performance and productivity of crossbreed Korean native ducks for the production of commercial Korean native duck.

본 시험은 국내 실정에 맞는 토종 실용오리 보급을 위하여 순종 토종오리 2계통을 4개 교배조합으로 나누어 교배시킨 토종오리의 생산성을 조사하기 위하여 수행하였다. 공시동물은 A와 B계통의 토종 종오리를 교배시켜 발생시킨 암수 오리병아리 480수를 4교배조합(AA, AB, BB, BA)과 암수로 구분하여 $4{\times}2$의 복합요인으로 총 8처리구, 처리구당 4반복, 반복당 15수씩 완전임의 배치하여 8주간 사육하였다. 시험사료는 옥수수-대두박 위주의 육용오리 사료를 0~3주령(CP 22.0%, ME 2,904 kcal/kg)과 3~8주령(CP 18.0%, ME 3,002 kcal/kg)으로 나누어 급여하였다. 3주령 AA의 체중이 BB나 BA에 비해 높게 나타났으며(P<0.05), 8주령에는 교배종 사이에서 유의적인 차이가 없었다. 암수 차이에서는 3주령과 8주령 모두 수컷의 체중이 높게 나타났다(P<0.05, P<0.01). 0~3주령에서는 AB의 증체량이 가장 높았으며(P<0.05), 3~8주령과 0~8주령의 증체량은 교배종 사이에서 유의차가 없었다(P<0.01). 0~3주령, 3~8주령 및 0~8주령의 사료섭취량과 사료요구율은 교배조합에 따른 유의차는 보이지 않았다. 암수 비교에서는 증체량, 사료섭취량 및 사료요구율에 대해서 수컷이 암컷에 비해 높게 나타났다(P<0.01). 교배조합과 암수에 대한 균일도와 생존율은 유의적인 차이가 없었으나, 수컷의 생존지수가 암컷에 비해 높게 나타났다(P<0.01). 본 연구는 교배조합 토종오리의 생산성, 균일도, 생존율 및 생산지수에 대한 기초자료를 제공함으로써, 국내 토종오리산업화에 도움이 되고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali MS, Yang HS, Jeong JY, Moon SH, Hwang YH, Park GB, Joo ST 2008 Effect of chilling temperature of carcass on breast meat quality of duck. Poult Sci 87:1860-1867. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00194
  2. Attia YA, Abd Al-Hamid AE, Seweil HS, Qota EM, Bovera F, Monasta G, Sahledom MD 2013 Effect of dietary amounts of inorganic and organic zinc on productive and physiological traits of White Pekin ducks. Animal 7:895-900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000050
  3. Bang HT, Na JC, Choi HC, Chae HS, Kang HK, King DW, Kim MJ, Suh OS, Park SB, Choi YH 2010 A comparative study on performances and carcass traits in three major meat-type duck strains in Korea. Kor J Poult Sci 389-398.
  4. Baeza E, Dessay C, Wacrenier N, Marche G, Listrat A 2002 Effect of selection for improved body weight and composition on muscle and meat characteristics in Muscovy duck. Br Poult Sci 43(4):560-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166022000004471
  5. Chae HS, Yoo YM, Ahn CN, Kim DH, Ham JS, Jeong SK, Lee JM, Choi YI 2006 Effect of rearing period on chemical composition of duck meats. Kor J Food Sci Ani Resour 26:9-14.
  6. Choo YK, Kwon HJ, Oh ST, Kang CW, Kim HK, Hong EC, Heo KN, Lee SK, An BS 2014 Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Korean native ducks fed diets with varying levels of limiting amino acids. Asia-Aust J Anim Sci 27:518-523. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13675
  7. Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  8. Farhat A, Chavez ER 2000 Comparative performance, blood chemistry, and carcass composition of two lines of Pekin ducks reared mixed or separated by sex. Poult Sci 79:460-465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.4.460
  9. Griffin AM, Renema RA, Robinson FE, Zuidhof MJ 2005 The influence of rearing light period and the USA of broiler or broiler breeder diets on forty-two-day body weight, fleshing, and flock uniformity in broiler stocks. J Appl Poult Res 14:204-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.2.204
  10. Heo KN, Kim HK, Kim CD, Kim SH, Lee MJ, Choo HJ, Son BR, Choi HC, Lee SB, Hong EC 2013 Evaluation of Korean native ducks on production efficiency factor, carcass yield, partial meat ratio and meat quality with weeks. Korean J Poult Sci 40:121-127. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.2.121
  11. Hong EC, Heo KN, Kim HK, Kang BS, Kim CD, Choo HJ, Choi HC, Mushtaq MMH, Parvin R, Kim JH 2014 Growth performance, carcass yield and meat quality of Korean native duck. J Agric Sci Tech A 4:76-85.
  12. Kang GH, Jeong JY, Ali S, Kim SH, Jang BG, Kang HS, Lee DS, Lee SJ, Park GB, Joo ST 2006 Effect of boning time and storage temperature on meat quality of duck breast. Kor J Food Sci Ani Resour 26:43-48.
  13. Kim HK, Kang BS, Hwangbo J, Kim CD, Heo KN, Choo HJ, Park DS, Suh OS, Hong EC 2012 The study on growth performance and carcass yield of meat-type Korean native ducks. Kor J Poult Sci 39:45-52. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.1.045
  14. Kim KS, Lee MK, Lee WJ, Choi YI, Cho SK 2011 Effect of dietary Astaxanthin producing bacteria (Xanthophyllomyces dendrohous) on the growth performance and meat quality of ducks. K Anim Sci Tech 53:139-146. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2011.53.2.139
  15. Korean Feeding Standard for Poultry 2012 National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Korea.
  16. Lee WJ, Lee KH 2005 Effects of dietary kaolin on the performance, product quality and feeding environment of growing ducks. Kor J Poult Sci 32:81-87.
  17. Lim KT, Lee JC, Cheong JH, Jung WJ, Kim TH 2000 Meat quality of Mallard by feeding of MS-fermented food waste Kor J Environ Agri 19:332-338.
  18. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs) 2014 Agricultural and Livestock Production Index.
  19. NIAS (National Institute of Animal Science) 2009 Comparative research on availability and growth performance of species ducks. Annual Livestock Research Report.
  20. NLRI (National Livestock Research Institute) 1999 The study on characteristics of housed ducks. Annual Livestock Research Report.
  21. National Research Council 1994 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th reved. National Academy Press Washington DC.
  22. SAS 2012 SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  23. Wu LY, Fang YJ, Guo XY 2011 Dietary L-arginine supplementation beneficially regulates body fat deposition of meattype ducks. Br Poult Sci 52:221-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.559452

Cited by

  1. The Study on Growth Performance and Uniformity of White Korean Native Ducks vol.43, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.1.39