CELLMED (셀메드)

Cellmed Orthocellular Medicine and Pharmaceutical Association (셀메드 세포교정의약학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Systematic network analysis of herb formula in Traditional East Asian Medicine discloses synergistic operation of medicinal herb pairs with statistical significance

  • Lee, Jungsul (Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST) ;
  • Jeon, Jongwook (KM based Technology Application Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Chulhee (Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST)
  • Received : 2014.12.17
  • Accepted : 2015.03.18
  • Published : 2015.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Traditional East Asian Medicine (TEAM) prescriptions typically consist of several herbs based on the assumption that the herbs operate synergistically and/or cooperate on several related pathways simultaneously. This is a general concept that is widely accepted in TEAM, but it has not been tested systematically. To check this assumption statistically, we have text mined traditional Korean medicine text the Inje-ji(仁濟志, Collections of benevolent savings), a text that contains more than 5000 herb-cocktail prescriptions. We created herb-pairing network based on herb-herb pairing specificity and performed a systematic network analysis. Herbs were shown to be used selectively with other herbs and not randomly. Moreover, herb pairs were more specifically associated with symptoms than were single herbs. Single herbs and combinations of herbs specifically used for diabetes mellitus were successfully identified. As conclusion, herb-pairings in TEAM are not randomly constructed; instead, each herb was selectively used with other herbs. In terms of statistical significance, herb pairs were more specifically associated with symptoms than were single herbs alone. Collectively, these results suggest that it may be important to understand the interactions among multiple ingredients contained in herb pairs rather than trying to identify a single compound to resolve symptoms.

Keywords

References

  1. Assenov Y, Ramirez F, Schelhorn SE, Lengauer T, Albrecht M. Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:282-284. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm554
  2. Bader GD, Hogue CW. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-2
  3. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:101-113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1272
  4. Chuang HY, Hofree M, Ideker T. A decade of systems biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Bi. 2010;26:721-744. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104122
  5. Kall L, Storey JD, Noble WS. Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:i42-i48. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn294
  6. Lima-Mendez G, van Helden J. The powerful law of the power law and other myths in network biology.Mol Biosyst. 2009;5:1482-1493. https://doi.org/10.1039/b908681a
  7. Newman ME. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001;64:016132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
  8. Seo Y. Imwon-kyungjeji (林園經濟志). (Seoul, Korea; Bokyung Culture Press), 1983.
  9. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498-2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303