Korean Journal of Materials Research (한국재료학회지)

Materials Research Society of Korea (한국재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Strain Path on Lattice Strain Evolution during Monotonic and Cyclic Tension of Magnesium Alloy

  • Yoon, Cheol (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Gharghouri, Michael A. (Canadian Neutron Beam Centre, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories) ;
  • Lee, Soo Yeol (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2015.04.15
  • Accepted : 2015.05.04
  • Published : 2015.05.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In-situ neutron diffraction has been employed to examine the effect of strain path on lattice strain evolution during monotonic and cyclic tension in an extruded Mg-8.5wt.%Al alloy. In the cyclic tension test, the maximum applied stress increased with cycle number. Lattice strain data were acquired for three grain orientations, characterized by the plane normal to the stress axis. The lattice strain in the hard {10.0} orientation, which is unfavorably oriented for both basal slip and {10.2} extension twinning, evolved linearly throughout both tests during loading and unloading. The {00.2} orientation exhibited significant relaxation associated with {10.2} extension twinning. Coupled with a linear lattice strain unloading behavior, this relaxation led to increasingly compressive residual strains in the {00.2} orientation with increasing cycle number. The {10.1} orientation is favorably oriented for basal slip, and thus showed a soft grain behavior. Microyielding occurred in the monotonic tension test and in all cycles of the cyclic test at an applied stress of ~50 MPa, indicating that strain hardening in this orientation was not completely stable from one cycle to the next. The lattice strain unloading behavior was linear in the {10.1} orientation, leading to a compressive residual strain after every cycle, which, however, did not increase systematically from one cycle to the next as in the {00.2} orientation.

Keywords

References

  1. C. S. Roberts, Magnesium and its Alloys, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1960).
  2. I. L. Dillamore, R. J. Hazel, T. W. Watson and P. Hadden, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 13, 1049 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(71)90027-0
  3. C. J. Bettles and M. A. Gibson, JOM, 57, 46 (2005).
  4. M. A. Gharghouri, G. C. Weatherly, J. D. Embury and J. Root, Philso. Mag. A, 79, 1671 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619908210386
  5. X. Y. Lou, M. Li, R. K. Boger, S. R. Agnew and R. H. Wagoner, Int. J. Plast., 23, 44 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.005
  6. L. Wu, A. Jain, D. W. Brown, G. M. Stoica, S. R. Agnew, B. Clausen, D. E. Fielden and P. K. Liaw, Acta Mater., 56, 688 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.030
  7. O. Muransky, M. R. Barnett, V. Luzin and S. Vogel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 1383 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.018
  8. P. G. Partridge, Metall. Rev., 12, 169 (1967).
  9. E. W. Kelly and W. F. Hosford, Trans. Metall. Soc., AIME, 242, 5 (1968).
  10. S. Y. Lee and M. A. Gharghouri, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 572, 98 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.02.021
  11. S. R. Agnew, M. H. Yoo and C. N. Tome, Acta Mater., 49, 4277 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00297-X
  12. C. H. J. Davies, S. Yi, J. Bohlen and K. U. Kainer, Mater. Sci. Forum, 495-497, 1633 (2005).
  13. D. W. Brown, S. R. Agnew, M. A. M. Bourke, T. M. Holden, S. C. Vogel and C. N. Tome, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 399, 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.016
  14. B. Clausen, C. N. Tome, D. W. Brown and S. R. Agnew, Acta Mater., 56, 2456 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.057
  15. M. D. Nave and M. R. Barnett, Scripta Mater., 51, 881 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.002
  16. L. Wu, S. R. Agnew, D. W. Brown, G. M. Stoica, B. Clausen, A. Jain, D. E. Fielden and P.K. Liaw, Acta Mater., 56, 3699 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.006
  17. M. R. Barnett, Z. Keshavarz, A.G. Beer and D. Atwell, Acta Mater., 52, 5093 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015
  18. G. Proust, C. N. Tome, A. Jain and S.R. Agnew, Int. J. Plast., 25, 861 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005
  19. O. Muransky, D.G. Carr, P. Sittner and E.C. Oliver, Int. J. Plast., 25, 1107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.08.002
  20. S. Y. Lee, H. Wang, M. A. Gharghouri, G. Nayyeri, W. Woo, E. Shin, P. D. Wu, W. J. Poole, W. Wu and K. An, Acta Mater., 73, 139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.038