DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Art Infusion Effect on Fashion Products according to Self-monitoring and the Luxury Level of Fashion Brands

자기감시성과 패션브랜드 럭셔리 수준에 따른 패션제품의 명화 주입 효과에 관한 연구

  • 최효정 (성균관대학교 의상학과 패션마케팅 전공) ;
  • 황선진 (성균관대학교 의상학과 패션마케팅 전공) ;
  • 여준상 (동국대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2014.03.28
  • Accepted : 2014.12.31
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

This study empirically confirmed how an art infusion into fashion products affect consumer's preference through Study 1 and Study 2. Study 1 examined the effect of an art infusion and the difference of an art infusion effect according to self-monitoring scale by designing groups composed of 2 (art infusion: infusion versus non-infusion) ${\times}2$ (self-monitoring: high versus low). Study 2 examined the difference of an art infusion effect according to the luxury level of fashion brands by designing groups composed of 2 (art infusion: infused versus non-infused) ${\times}2$ (fashion brand luxury levels: high versus mid versus low). This study was conducted using a convenience sample of women in their 20s and 30s residing in the Seoul and Daegu region. In Study 1, 162 participants were randomly assigned to two experiment situations of art infusion. In Study 2, 192 participants were randomly assigned to six experiment situations of art infusion and luxury level of fashion brands. For the data analysis, we conducted reliability analysis, two-way ANOVA and simple main effect analysis using SPSS 18.0 statistics package. The results of Study 1 and 2 are as follows. First, consumer's preference was shown to be higher for fashion products with art infusion rather than fashion products without art infusion. Second, the positive effect of art infusion on consumer's preference was significant in the group of high selfmonitors. But there was a non-significant effect of art infusion in the group of low self-monitors. Lastly, the positive effect of art infusion on consumer's preference is higher in the case of a mid-level luxury brand rather than in the case of a high-level luxury brand and low-level luxury brand.

Keywords

References

  1. Assael, H. (1998). Consumer behavior & marketing action (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Pub.
  2. Browne, B. A., & Kaldenberg, D. O. (1997). Conceptualizing self-monitoring: links to materialism and product involvement. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769710155848
  3. Cheon, Y. S., & Jun, J. W. (2011). Halo effects of visual art advertising. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(1), 7-27.
  4. Choi, E. Y., Lim, J. E., & Hwang, J. S. (2011). The advertising effectiveness of scarcity message: The role of "Limited- Edition" message and time pressure. Journal of Advertising Research, 89(0), 177-204.
  5. Choi, H, R. (2009). The study of the effect of brand extrinsic cues on perceived quality, perceived risk and purchase intention: Focus on brand awareness, store image, perceived price of sport shoes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  6. Chu, W. J., Jung, B. H., & Kim, H. K. (2010). The influence of art infusion type on product evaluation-Functional product vs. hedonic product-. Journal of Consumer Studies, 21(4), 43-69.
  7. Debono, K. G., & Rubin, K. (1995). Country of origin and perceptions of product quality: An individual difference perspective. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 17(1/2), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.1995.9646142
  8. Dubois, B., Laurent, G., & Czellar, S. (2001). Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes. Jouy-en-Josas: Groupe HEC.
  9. Fishbein, M. (1966). The relationship between beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. In S. Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents (pp. 199-226). New York and London: Academic Press.
  10. Gorn, G. J. (1982). The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251163
  11. Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2008). Art infusion: The influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379
  12. Han, Y. H. (2013). The influence of package design applied by art image on brand evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  13. Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2007). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  14. Jang, J. S., Lee, J. H., & Ahn, K. H. (2011). The effect of the congruence between brand personality and self-Image on purchase intention: The moderating role of self-monitoring and product type. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(5), 7-23.
  15. Johar, G. V., Sengupta, J., & Aaker, J. L. (2005). Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: Trait versus evaluative inferencing. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 458-469. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.458
  16. Joo, D. M. (2009). A study on the relationship between art marketing advertising and consumer response. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  17. Ju, S. H. (2012). The characteristics of collaboration product affect consumer's emotion. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 17(1), 47-77.
  18. Ju, S. H., & Koo, D. M. (2012). The effect of curiosity and need for uniqueness on emotional responses to art collaborated products including moderating effect of gender. Asia Marketing Journal, 14(2), 97-125.
  19. Kim, J. K. (2003). The effect of the self-congruency between self-image and brand personality and the self-monitoring on the brand preference. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  20. Kim, S. G., & Yang, Y. (1995). 자기-감시, 사용상황, 및 지각 된 위험이 광고 문구의 선호도에 미치는 영향 [The impact of self-monitoring, use situation and perceived risk on consumer attitude about advertising slogan]. Korean Psychological Association Annual Conference, 1995(0), 429-436.
  21. Kim, S. J. (2010). The effect of the advertising with art infusion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dong-A University, Busan.
  22. Kim, S. Y. (2013). A study on the impact of fashion brand collaboration on the women university students' purchasing decisions. Journal of the Business Adminstration Research, 6(1), 51-74.
  23. Kim, Y., & Hwang, S. J. (2000). A study on the degree of selfmonitoring, perceived risk and the appeal types of advertising impact on cosmetic purchase behavior. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 38(6), 59-70.
  24. Klein, O., Snyder, M., & Livingston, R. W. (2004). Prejudice on the stage: Self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501697
  25. Lee, J. E., & Han, Y. H. (2010). Effects of art infusion on luxury perceptions: Focus on the moderating effects of product and brand concept types. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(5), 69-97.
  26. Lee, M. H. (2000). The purchasing behavior and use of cosmetics associated with self-monitoring and demographic variables. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 8(5), 771-784.
  27. Lee, S. H., & Park, J. L. (2011). Effect of fashion brand's collaboration on customers. Journal of the Korea Society of Design Trend, 30(-), 233-243.
  28. Lee, Y. J. (2013). The influence of art infusion on consumers' brand evaluation according to painting genres: Focusing on consumers' need for uniqueness and regulatory focus. Unpublished master's thesis, Hongik University, Seoul.
  29. Min, S. K. (2010). A study on the relationship between art marketing and hotel advertisement effect. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  30. Moon, S. Y. (2010). The effect of the ad with art image's product- art fit, art familiarity, and product type on the consumer's response. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  31. Okonkwo, U. (2009). The luxury brand strategy challenge. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5/6), 287-289. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.53
  32. Park, Y. K. (2011). A study on the hedonic purchase of utilitarian product through art marketing. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Busan.
  33. Samsung Economic Research Institute. (2011, December 12). 감성마케팅에 관한 연구 [A study on the sensibility marketing]. Samsung Economic Research Institute. Retrieved June 4, 2012, from http://www.seri.org/kz/kzBndbV.html?ucgb=KZBNDB&no=115584&cateno=
  34. Shin, S. Y. (2011). Estimating the art infusion effect of art marketing using a characteristic of famous painting. Unpublished master's thesis, Chugye University for the Arts, Seoul.
  35. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039
  36. Snyder, M., & Grangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of selfmonitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.125
  37. Song, J. E. (2011). The effects of product evaluation on the different types of art marketing collaboration: The moderating role of consumer's emotional reaction. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul.
  38. Spangenberg, E. R., Crowley, A. E., & Henderson, P. W. (1996). Improving the store environment: Do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251931
  39. Taylor, V. A., & Bearden, W. O. (2002). The effect of price on brand extension evaluations: The moderating role of extension similarity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994380
  40. Yoo, M. Y. (2009). 예술 주입(Art Infusion)이 제품평가에 미치는 영향: 이미지 친숙도와 적합성을 중심으로 [The effects of art infusion on consumer's product evaluation: Focusing on the degree of intimacy and suitability of image]. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul.