DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear dynamic response of reinforced concrete building retrofitted with buckling restrained braces

  • Guneyisi, Esra Mete (Department of Civil Engineering, Gaziantep University) ;
  • Tunca, Osman (Department of Civil Engineering, Gaziantep University) ;
  • Azez, Ibrahim (Department of Civil Engineering, Gaziantep University)
  • Received : 2013.08.16
  • Accepted : 2014.12.16
  • Published : 2015.06.25

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of using buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) in mitigating the seismic response of a case study 6 storey reinforced concrete (RC) building. In the design of the BRBs with non-prismatic cross-sections, twelve combinations of ${\alpha}$ and ${\beta}$ design parameters that influence the strength and stiffness of the BRBs, respectively, were considered. The response of the structure with and without BRBs under earthquake ground accelerations were evaluated through nonlinear dynamic analysis. Two sets of ground motions representative of the design earthquake with 10% and 50% exceedance probability in fifty years were taken into account. By comparing the structural performance of the original and buckling restrained braced structures, it was observed that the use of the BRBs were very effective in mitigating the seismic response as a retrofit scheme. However, the selection of the strength and stiffness parameters of the BRBs had considerable effect on the response characteristics of RC structures. For instance, by increasing the value of ${\alpha}$ and by decreasing the value of ${\beta}$ of the buckling-restrained braces, the maximum deformation demand of the structures increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Ash, C. and Bartoletti, S. (2009), "Seismic rehabilitation of an existing braced frame hospital building by direct replacement with buckling-restrained braces", ATC & SEI 2009 Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, San Francisco, California, United States.
  2. Bergami, A.V. and Nuti, C. (2013), "A design procedure of dissipative braces for seismic upgrading structures", Earthq. Struct., 4(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.085
  3. Clark, P., Kasai, K., Aiken, I.D. and Kimura, I. (2000), "Evaluation of design methodologies for structures incorporating steel unbonded braces for energy dissipation", Proceedings, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
  4. Computers and Structures Inc. (2011), SAP 2000 Advanced 14.0.0., Structural Analysis Program, Berkeley, CA.
  5. Della-Corte, G., D'Aniello, M. and Landolfo, R. (2015), "Field testing of all-steel buckling restrained braces applied to a damaged reinforced concrete building", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 141(1), D4014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001080
  6. Di Sarno, L. and Manfredi, G. (2010), "Seismic retrofitting with buckling restrained braces: Application to an existing non-ductile RC framed building", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(11), 1279-1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.001
  7. Farhat, F., Nakamura, S. and Takahashi, K. (2009), "Application of genetic algorithm to optimization of buckling restrained braces for seismic upgrading of existing structures", Comput. Struct., 87(1-2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.002
  8. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
  9. Guneyisi, E.M. (2012), "Seismic reliability of steel moment resisting framed buildings retrofitted with buckling restrained braces", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(5), 853-874. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1161
  10. Guneyisi, E.M. and Sahin, N.D. (2014), "Seismic fragility analysis of conventional and viscoelastically damped moment resisting frames", Earthq. Struct., 7(3), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.3.295
  11. Guneyisi, E.M. and Ameen, N. (2014), "Structural behavior of conventional and buckling restrained braced frames subjected to near-field ground motions", Earthq. Struct., 7(4), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.553
  12. Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skelton, R.E., Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.F. and Yao, J.T.P. (1997), "Structural control: past, present and future", J Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123(9), 897-971. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)
  13. Iwata, M. and Murai, M. (2006), "Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks: performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(14), 1807-1826. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.608
  14. Kalyanaraman, V., Sridhara, B.N. and Ramachandran, B. (1998), "A sleeved bracing system for earthquake resistant design of tall buildings", Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India.
  15. Kanaji, H., Takada, Y. and Mino, T. (2003), "Study on cost reduction of a long span truss bridge retrofitted with hysteretic dampers", Proceedings of Japan road conference.
  16. Karalis, A.A. and Stylianidisa, K.S. (2013), "Experimental investigation of existing R/C frames strengthened by high dissipation steel link elements", Earthq. Struct., 5(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.2.143
  17. Koetaka, Y., Byakuno, Y. and Inoue, K. (2006), "Experimental verification of design criteria of knee brace damper", Proceedings of the 8th Taiwan Korea Japan Joint seminar on earthquake engineering for building structures.
  18. Kumar, G.R., Kumar, S.R.S. and Kalyanaraman, V. (2007), "Behaviour of frames with non-buckling bracings under earthquake loading", J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(2), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.04.012
  19. Merritt, S., Uang, C.M. and Benzoni, G. (2003a), "Subassemblage testing of CoreBrace buckling-restrained braces", University of California, San Diego, Report No. TR-2003=01.
  20. Merritt, S., Uang, C.M. and Benzoni, G. (2003b), "Subassemblage testing of Star Seismic bucklingrestrained braces", University of California, San Diego, Report No. TR-2003=04.
  21. PEER (2011), Users manual for the PEER Ground motion database application.
  22. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Teran-Gilmore, A. (2010), "Seismic performance of existing steel buildings retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces", 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia.
  23. Sabelli, R. and Lopez, W. (2004), "Design of buckling-restrained braced frames, modern steel construction", North American Steel Construction Conference, Long Beach, California.
  24. Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. and Chang, C. (2003), "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X
  25. Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive Energy dissipation systems in structural engineering, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
  26. Soong, T.T. and Jr Spencer, B.F. (2002), "Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the practice", Eng. Struct., 24(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X
  27. Symans, M.D., Charney, F.A., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C., Kircher, C.A., Johnson, M.W. and McNamara, R.J. (2008), "Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: current practice and recent developments", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 134(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(3)
  28. Tsai, K.C., Hsiao, B.C., Wang, K.J., Weng, Y.T., Lin, M.L., Lin, K.C., Chen, C.H., Lai, J.W. and Lin, S.L. (2008), "Pseudo-dynamic tests of a full scale CFT/BRB frame Part I: Specimen design, experiment and analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(7), 1081-1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.804
  29. Usami, T., Ge, H.B. and Kasai, A. (2008), "Overall buckling prevention condition of buckling restrained braces as a structural control damper", Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China.
  30. Usami, T., Lu, Z.H. and Ge, H.B. (2005), "A seismic upgrading method for steel arch bridges using buckling-restrained braces", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(4-5), 471-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.442
  31. Wada, A., Saeki, E., Takeuchi, T. and Watanabe, A. (1988), "Development of unbonded brace", Nippon Steel Corporation Building Construction and Urban Development Division, Tokyo, Japan.
  32. Watanabe, A., Hitomi, Y., Yaeki, E., Wada, A. and Fujimoto, M. (1988), "Properties of braces encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube", Proceedings of 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Kyoto, Tokyo.

Cited by

  1. Comparative Capacity Assessment of CFRP Retrofit Techniques for RC Frames with Masonry Infills Using Pushover Analysis pp.2191-4281, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3488-4
  2. Performance of innovative composite buckling-restrained fuse for concentrically braced frames under cyclic loading vol.36, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.2.163