DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TACT Productivity Management for Finish Works of Residential Buildings using Productivity Achievement Ratio (PAR)

공동주택 마감공사 TACT 기법 생산성 관리 - Productivity Achievement Ratio를 활용한 생산성 관리 -

  • Joo, Seonu (Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Moonseo (Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Soo (Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Pyo (Department of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2015.02.10
  • Accepted : 2015.04.07
  • Published : 2015.05.31

Abstract

To complete various types of finish works with higher quality in much less time, TACT, which was mostly used for high-rise buildings, has been adapted to meet the needs for systematic schedule management in construction sites. However, the effectiveness of adapting TACT has not been shown as expected due to the different perspectives on productivity from both general contractor and subcontractors based on unforeseen conditions according to the types of site. Furthermore, not enough theoretical backgrounds, empirical data, and systematic approaches to solve the fundamental problems caused by each participants' different views on productivity has produced obstacles for establishing effective solutions. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the possible main reasons for having different point of views regarding productivity among various participants of residential building sites using TACT based on literature review, site survey, and interviews. Also, case study was conducted to propose obtainable productivity (OP) regression equation and productivity achievement ratio (PAR) with reduction factors (RFs) and actual productivity (AP) data from an actual construction site. The proposed outcome may assist general contractors converting output management with PPC to productivity management with actual data using PAR. On the other hand, subcontractors would be able to estimate theory-based maximum productivity of construction sites with TACT by using OP. The PAR will enhance the communication between general and sub-contractors for their decision making process. Finally, the main RFs derived from PAR could be used as essential keys for productivity management to increase the economical and operational effectiveness of the construction project.

다양한 공종이 혼재하는 공동주택 마감공사의 공기단축과 품질확보를 위해 마감공사의 체계적인 공정관리 필요성이 높아짐에 따라 고층 오피스 빌딩 마감공사에 적용하던 TACT가 도입되었다. 하지만 기존 기법과의 차이, 현장 상황의 차이(오피스 vs 아파트) 등으로 인해 주관사와 협력업체 간의 생산성에 관한 관점차이가 발생하고, 이로 인해 TACT 적용을 통한 기대만큼의 효용성을 얻지 못하고 있다. 또한 이러한 문제점에 대한 인식에도 불구하고 실효성 있는 대책 도출을 위한 참여주체 별 생산성 관점 차이 발생의 근본 원인에 대한 이론적 근거 및 실증적인 데이터와 체계적인 방법론을 통한 분석이 부족하다. 본 연구는 TACT 공정관리기법, 생산성 관리 및 생산성 지표에 대한 기존 문헌고찰과 TACT 적용 현장 설문조사 및 면담을 통해 공동주택 현장 TACT 도입 시 참여주체 간의 생산성에 대한 근본적 관점 차의 원인을 분석한다. 또한 실제 현장 사례의 생산성 제한 요인 도출 및 현재 생산성 측정값을 통해 획득 가능 생산성 값의 회귀식을 구하고, 생산성 달성율(Productivity Achievement Ratio, PAR)을 산출한다. 현 상황에서 최대로 획득 가능한 생산성(Obtainable Productivity, OP), 이를 제한하는 생산성 제한 요인(RF)으로 인해 획득하게 되는 실제 생산성(Actual Productivity, AP)의 비율 (PAR)을 통하여 주관사는 계획 대비 실적율인 기존 PPC(Percent Plan Complete) 측정을 통한 산출량 관리를 실제 현장 생산성 데이터 획득을 통한 생산성 관리 (측정, 평가, 계획, 향상)로 전환 가능하다. 협력업체는 OP 산출을 통해 TACT 적용 현장에서 획득 가능한 이론적 최대 생산성을 추정할 수 있으며, 이를 토대로 생산성 지표인 PAR 측정값을 주관사와의 의사소통 도구 및 의사결정 수단으로 활용할 수 있다. 또한 PAR 산출 과정 중 도출한 주요 RF 들은 현장 효용성 증대를 위한 생산성 관리 포인트로 활용 가능하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adrian, J. J. (1987). Construction productivity improvement, Elsevier, New York, N.Y.
  2. Ballard, G., and Howell, G. A. (2003). "Lean project management." Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), pp. 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210301997
  3. Business Roundtable. (1987). Measuring productivity in construction, A Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Project Report.
  4. Carr, R. I., and Meyer, W. L. (1974). "Planning construction of repetitive building units." J. Constr. Div., 100(3), pp. 403-412.
  5. Herbsman, Z., and Ellis, R. (1990). "Research of factors influencing construction productivity." Constr. Manage. Econom., 8(1), pp. 49-61 https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199000000005
  6. Hwang, H., Kim, K., Seo, S., Kim, C., and Shin, D. (2002). "Analysis of Actual Duration by Effecting Elements to Duration Estimate." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 3(3), pp. 84-93.
  7. Hwang, J. (2009). "Business Process Model for Applying TACT Methodology to Finish Work in Apartment House." MS Thesis, Soonsil University.
  8. Josephson, P. E., and Hammarlund, Y. (1999). "The causes and costs of defects in construction: A study of seven building projects." Autom. Constr., 8, pp. 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00114-9
  9. Jung, J. (2007). "Improvement of TACT Scheduling Management Process for the Finish Work of Apartment Houses." MS Thesis, Dankook University.
  10. Kim, B. (2012). "TACT Process Reengineering for Improving the Usability in Construction Sites." MS Thesis, Chungbuk National University.
  11. Kim, J., Kim, G., and Cho, H. (2006). "The Success Factors of Scheduling using the TACT Technique in Wall Type Apartment House Construction." Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 6(1), pp. 79-86. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2006.6.1.079
  12. Kim, J., Yoon, Y., Jang, M., and Suh, S. (2007). "Workflow-based TACT Planning & Scheduling Process -Focused on the Finish Work of Apartment Building-." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 23(6), pp. 153-162.
  13. Kim, K. (2014). "A Study on Improvement of Repetition Process Management for Finish Works Quality of Construction -Focused on Apartment Housing Projects-." MS Thesis, Yonsei University.
  14. Kim, O., Park, J., and Kim, B. (2012). "Reengineering of TACT Process Management Analyzed on Task Information." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 13(5), pp. 113-124. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2012.13.5.113
  15. Kim, S., Na, K., Kim, T., Yu, J., Lee, H., and Kim, C. (2003). "A Study on the TACT Management using a Daily Report Information." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 4(4), pp. 80-87.
  16. Kim, S., Son, K., Joo, J., Lee, D., and Lee, S. (2011). " An Enhanced TACT Technique for Finish Work of High-rise Residential Buildings." Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 11(4), pp. 396-406. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2011.11.4.396
  17. Kim, S., Yoo, J., Kim, D., and Park, J. (2014). "TACT Scheduling & Monitoring of Apartment Finish Works based on the BDM Technique." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(2), pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.2.003
  18. Kim, T. (2008). "Improvement of TACT Scheduling Process in Finishing Works of the Residential Housing." MS Thesis, Department of Architecture Graduate School, Ajou University.
  19. Kim T., Lee, H., Park, M., and Yu, J. (2011). "Productivity Management Methodology using Productivity Achievement Ratio." Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, 15(1), pp. 23-31.
  20. Kim. T., Yu, J., Baek, T., and Lee, H. (2004). "Productivity Achievement Ratio Model through Construction Productivity Reduction Factor Analysis." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 24(2), pp. 135-142.
  21. Kim. T., Yu, J., and Lee, H. (2003). "Productivity Management Methodology using Productivity Achievement Ratio." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 19(9), pp. 103-111.
  22. Kim, Y., Han, J., Shin, D., Kim, K., Kim, C., and Seo, S. (2003). " A Tact Planning and Scheduling Process Model for Reduction of Finishing Work Duration in Building Construction Projects." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 19(1), pp. 161-168.
  23. Koskela, L. (1992). "Application of The New Production Philosophy to Construction." CIFE Technical Report No. 72, Stanford University.
  24. Koushki, P. A., Al-Rashid, K., and Kartam, N. (2005). "Delays and cost increases in the construction of private residential projects in Kuwait." Constr. Manage. Econom., 23, pp. 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000326710
  25. Lee, H. (2014). "Issues and Improvement Schemes of TACT Process Management Application to Practical sites in Public Housing Finishing Works." MS Thesis, The Graduate School of Construction Engineering, Chung-Ang University.
  26. Lee, J. (2001). "A Work Interference Management Model for Apartment Building Finish Works." MS Thesis, Chung-Ang University.
  27. Lee, W. (2011). "The Application of the TACT Method for Finish Works of Apartment Buildings." MS Thesis, KyungHee University.
  28. Lin, C., and Huang, H. (2010). "Improved Baseline Productivity Analysis Technique." J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(3), pp. 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000129
  29. Lowe, J. G. (1987). "The measurement of productivity in the construction industry."Constr. Manage. Econom., 5(2), pp. 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446198700000010
  30. Neil, J. M., and Knack, L. E. (1984). "Predicting productivity."AACE Transactions, pp. 1-8.
  31. Oglesby, C., Parker, H., and Howell, G. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
  32. Okoil, C., and Pawlowski S. (2004). "The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: An Example, Design Considerations and Applications." Information & Management, 42(1), pp. 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
  33. Park, M., Kim, K., Shin, D., and Cha, H. (2006). "Improvement on TACT Scheduling Method Applying Theory of Constraints." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 22(6), pp. 139-146.
  34. Peer, S. (1974). "Network analysis and construction planning." J. Constr. Div., 100(3), pp. 203-210.
  35. Rendall, F. J., and Wolf, D. M. (1983). Statistical Sources and Techniques, McGraw-Hill, London, pp. 41-52.
  36. Sacks, R., and Goldin, M. (2007). "Lean Management Model for Construction of High-Rise Apartment Buildings." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(5), pp. 374-384. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:5(374)
  37. Shin, D. (2009). "Application Plan of TACT Process for Finish Works in Apartment Housing Projects." MS Thesis, Graduate School of Urban Science, University of Seoul.
  38. Sink, D. S. (1985). Productivity Management: Planning. Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y.
  39. Suh, S., Kim, J., Kim, S., Kim, C., and Lee, H. (2003). "Development and Application of TACT Management System." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 4(4), pp. 145-154.
  40. Sumanth, D. (1984). Productivity engineering and management, McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
  41. Thomas, H. R., and Mathews, C. T. (1985). "An analysis of the methods of measuring construction productivity." Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Texas.
  42. Thomas, H. R., and Zavrski, I. (1999). "Construction baseline productivity: Theory and practice." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), pp. 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(295)
  43. Xia, Bo, and Chan, Albert. (2011). "Measuring Complexity for Building Projects : a Delphi Study." Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(1), pp. 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211192544
  44. Yoon, Y., Joung, Y., Suh, S., Shin, D., Kim, C., and Kim, K. (2003). "Improvement of Construction Process Management Dividing th Work Area Reasonably in Building Construction." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 4(2), pp. 59-65.
  45. Yoon, Y., and Suh, S. (2005). "The Application of TACT Time at Finish Work for Building Construction - Focused on Office Building-." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 6(6), pp. 90-97.
  46. Yu, J., Lee, H., Kim, S., Kim, C., and Suh S. (2004). "Effect of Labor Factors on Work Flows." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 20(4), pp. 135-142.
  47. Ziglio E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision making. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publisher, London.