DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimating Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Diets Containing Leucaena leucocephala or Moringa oleifera Leaf Meals for Growing Rabbits by Two Methods

  • Safwat, A.M. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY)) ;
  • Sarmiento-Franco, L. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY)) ;
  • Santos-Ricalde, R.H. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY)) ;
  • Nieves, D. (National University of Llanos "Ezequiel Zamora" (UNELLEZ)) ;
  • Sandoval-Castro, C.A. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan (UADY))
  • Received : 2014.06.11
  • Accepted : 2015.01.19
  • Published : 2015.08.01

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the nutrient digestibility of growing rabbits fed diets with different levels of either Leucaena leucocephala (LLM) or Moringa oleifera (MOLM) leaf meals and also to compare total collection and $TiO_2$ marker methods for estimating digestibility. A total of 30 California growing rabbits ($1.81{\pm}0.19kg$ live weight on average) were randomly distributed into five experimental groups of six rabbits each and were housed in individual cages. The groups were control, 30% LLM, 40% LLM, 30% MOLM, and 40% MOLM. All groups received pelleted diets for two weeks; diets also contained 4 g/kg titanium dioxide as dietary marker. Daily feed intake was recorded during the whole experimental period and total feces were collected daily and weighed individually during four days. The results showed that there were no difference (p>0.05) in feed, dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), digestible energy, and crude fiber (CF) intake between the control group and the other experimental groups. The apparent digestibility values of DM, OM, CP, CF, acid detergent fiber, and gross energy were the highest for control group (p = 0.001), meanwhile MOLM diets had generally higher nutrient digestibility coefficients than LLM diets. Increasing the inclusion level of leaf meal in the diet from 30% to 40% improved the digestibility of CF from 45.02% to 51.69% for LLM and from 48.11% to 55.89% for MOLM. Similar results for apparent nutrient digestibility coefficients were obtained when either total collection or indigestible marker method was used. In conclusion, the digestibility of MOLM containing diets were better than LLM diets, furthermore $TiO_2$ as an external marker could be used as a simple, practical and reliable method to estimate nutrients digestibility in rabbit diets.

Keywords

References

  1. Abou-Elezz, F. M. K., L. Sarmiento-Franco, R. Santos-Ricalde, and F. Solorio-Sanchez. 2011. Nutritional effects of dietary inclusion of Leucaena leucocephala and Moringa oleifera leaf meal on Rhode Island Red hens' performance. Cuban J. Agric. Sci. 45:163-169.
  2. Ajayi, A. F., G. O. Farinu, O. O. Ojebiyi, and T. B. Olayeni. 2007. Performance evaluation of male weaner rabbits fed diets containing graded levels of blood-wild sunflower leaf meal mixture. World J. Agric. Sci. 3:250-255.
  3. Al-Harthi, M. A., A. A. El-Deek, Y. A. Attia, F. Bovera, and E. M. Qota. 2009. Effect of different dietary levels of mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) leaves and spice supplementation on productive performance, egg quality, lipid metabolism and metabolic profiles in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 50:700-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903202948
  4. Al Mamary, M., A. Molham, A. Abdulwali, and A. Al-Obeide. 2001. In vivo effects of dietary sorghum tannins on rabbit digestive enzymes and mineral absorption. Nutr. Res. 21:1393-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(01)00334-7
  5. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.
  6. Ayers, A. C., R. P. Barrett, and P. R. Cheeke. 1996. Feeding value of tree leaves (hybrid poplar and black locust) evaluated with sheep, goats and rabbits. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:51-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00845-4
  7. Boguhn, J., T. Baumgartel, A. Dieckmann, and M. Rodehutscord. 2009. Determination of titanium dioxide supplements in different matrices using two methods involving photometer and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer measurements. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 63:337-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390903052623
  8. Bovera, F., A. Lestingi, F. Iannaccone, A. Tateo, and A. Nizza. 2012. Use of dietary mannanoligosaccharides during rabbit fattening period: Effects on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass traits, and meat quality. J. Anim. Sci. 90:3858-3866. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4119
  9. Bovera, F., A. Lestingi, G. Piccolo, F. Iannaccone, Y. A. Attia, and A. Tateo. 2013. Effects of water restriction on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass and meat traits of rabbits. Animal 7:1600-1606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001146
  10. Calabro, S., A. Nizza, W. Pinna, M. I. Cutrignelli, and V. Piccolo. 1999. Estimation of digestibility of compound diets for rabbits using the in vitro gas production technique. World Rabbit Sci. 7:197-201.
  11. Chiou, P. W., B. Yu, and C. Lin. 1998. The effect of different fibre components on growth rate, nutrient digestibility, rate of digesta passage and hindgut fermentation in domesticated rabbits. Lab. Anim. 32:276-283. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367798780559310
  12. Fahey, J. W., A. T. Zakmann, and P. Talalay. 2001. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56:5-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00316-2
  13. Gidenne, T. 2000. Recent advances in rabbit nutrition: emphasis on fibre requirements. A review. World Rabbit Sci. 8:23-32.
  14. Machado, L. C., W. M. Ferreira, and C. Scpinello. 2012. Apparent digestibility of simplified and semi-simplified diets, with and without addition of enzymes, and nutritional value of fibrous sources for rabbits. R. Bras. Zootec. 41:1662-1670. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700015
  15. Minitab Inc. 2009. Minitab Statistical Software (Version 16). State College, City, PA, USA.
  16. Nieves, D., O. Teran, L. Silva, and C. Gonzalez. 2002. Nutrient in vivo digestibility in fattening rabbits mash diet's with increasing levels of Leucaena leucocephala. Revista Cientifica 2:408-411.
  17. Nieves, D., A. Barajas, G. Delgado, C. Gonzalez, and J. Ly. 2008. Faecal digestibility of diets with tropical forages in rabbits. Comparison between direct and indirect methods. Bioagro 20:67-72.
  18. Nuhu, F. 2010. Effect of Moringa Leaf Meal (MOLM) on Nutrient Digestibility, Growth, Carcass and Blood Indices of Weaner Rabbits. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah, Kumasi, Ghana.
  19. Odetola, O. M., O. O. Adetola, T. I. Ijadunola, O. Y. Adedeji, and O. A. Adu. 2012. Utilization of moringa (moringa oleifera) leaves meal as a replacement for soya bean meal in rabbit's diets. Sch. J. Agric. Sci. 2:309-313.
  20. Okorie, K. C. 2003. The Effect of palmitic acid fortified maize wet milling by-product on the performance of weaner rabbits. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 48:365-370.
  21. Pereira, R. A. N., E. O. S. Saliba, W. F. Motta, A. G. Bertechini, D. C. Z. Donato, M. R. Duarte, and M. L. Chaves. 2004. $LIPE^{(R)}$ marker for estimating total faecal production and dry matter apparent digestibility in growing rabbits. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Cong, Puebla, Mexico. pp. 930-935.
  22. Perez, J. M., F. Lebas, T. Gidenne, L. Maertens, G. Xiccato, R. Parigi-Bini, A. Dalle Zotte, M. E. Cossu, A. Carazzolo, M. J. Villamide, R. Carabano, M. J. Fraga, M. A. Ramos, C. Cervera, E. Blas, J. Fernandez, L. F. E. Cunha, and J. B. Freire. 1995. European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 3:41-43.
  23. Ravindran, V., L. Hew, G. Ravindran, and W. Bryden. 1999. A comparison of ileal digesta and excreta analysis for the determination of amino acid digestibility in food ingredients for poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:266-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987692
  24. Safwat, A. M., L. Sarmiento-Franco, R. H. Santos-Ricalde, and D. Nieves. 2014. Determination of tropical forage preferences using two offering methods in rabbits. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27:524-529. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13163
  25. Salisu, I. B., and G. T. Iyeghe-Erakpotobor. 2014. Effect of age and sex of rabbit on nutrient intake and digestibility. J. Global Biosci. 3:569-575.
  26. Sarwatt, S. V., G. H. Laswai, and R. Ubwe. 2003. Evaluation of the potential of Trichanthera gigantea as a source of nutrients for rabbit diets under small-holder production system in Tanzania. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 15 (11) Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/11/sarw1511.htm
  27. Simon, M. K. 2012. Growth response and carcass characteristics of rabbit fed graded levels of leucaena leucocephala diets. Cont. J. Vet. Sci. 6:10-13.
  28. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstartch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Cited by

  1. Impact of black soldier fly larval meal on growth performance, apparent digestibility, haematological and blood chemistry indices of guinea fowl starter keets under tropical conditions vol.49, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1312-x
  2. Effect of feed restriction on intake of Moringa oleifera and Leucaena leucocephala and growth performance of rabbits vol.49, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1377-6
  3. leaves as a substitute for alfalfa meal on nutrient digestibility, growth performance, carcass trait, meat quality, antioxidant capacity and biochemical parameters of rabbits pp.09312439, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12678
  4. Benefits and Inputs From Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters During Food-Animal Production vol.10, pp.1664-302X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00057
  5. Effects of replacement of alfalfa by big-leaf mulberry on growth performance, digestion and meat quality in growing rabbits vol.27, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2019.11529
  6. Tributyrin‐supplemented high‐soya bean meal diets of juvenile black sea bream, Acanthopagrus schlegelii: Study on growth performance and intestinal morphology and structure vol.51, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14355
  7. Reliability of acid-insoluble ash as internal marker for the measurement of digestibility in rabbits vol.28, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2020.12216
  8. Aspergillus awamori positively impacts the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidative activity and immune responses of growing rabbits vol.7, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.345
  9. Nutritional value of some raw materials for guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) feeding vol.5, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab019
  10. Sand accumulation in the digestive tract of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus): The role of the appendix vol.283, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21423