디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제13권6호
  • /
  • Pages.225-234
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

신경정신학에 융복합되는 신경생물학적 접근법의 한계점: 발달성 협응장애와 두 시각 이론에 관한 종설

Limitations of neurobiological approach convergent to neuropsychiatry: DCD and two visual systems theory

  • 투고 : 2015.04.04
  • 심사 : 2015.06.20
  • 발행 : 2015.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

신경생물학 접근법은 정신학에서의 심신 이원론 문제를 해결하고 새로운 진단과 치료법을 발달시키는 데 도움을 주었다. 하지만 신경정신장애의 복합성 때문에 신경생물학의 신경해부학 부분을 너무 강조하는 것은 문제가 될 수 있다. 예를 들어, 발달성 협응장애 (DCD)는 일반적으로 움직임과 관련된 장애이지만 종종 지각과도 긴밀한 관계가 있다. 뇌의 기능적 분류에 입각한 두 시각 이론은 대뇌의 복측은 물체의 재인을, 배측은 움직임, 위치와 관련되어 있다고 주장한다. 하지만 물체의 지각은 시각적으로 유도되는 행동과 밀접한 관련이 있다. 이 논문에서는 두 시각 이론을 설명하는 기본적인 연구들을 검토하고, 이 이론에 대한 비판을 제시한다. 특히, 발달성 협응장애와 같은 운동뿐만 아니라 지각과 관련이 있는 신경정신장애에 구조적인 신경생물학 접근법을 적용하는 것의 한계점을 제시한다. 결론적으로, 현대의 신경정신분야에 융복합적으로 사용되는 신경생물학 접근법은 유용하지만, 신경구조적 분류에 너무 집중하면 한계점이 나타날 수 있다.

Neurobiological approach helps to resolve the mind-body dualism and develop new assessment and treatment approaches in psychiatry. However, it could be a problem to place too much emphasis on certain aspects of neurobiology, specifically structural neuroanatomy, because of the complexity or comorbidity of neuropsychiatric disorders. Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), for instance, is generally related to problems in motor skills and this movement disability is often related to perception. One account, two visual systems theory, relied on functional distinction in brain; ventral stream is responsible for visual recognition, and dorsal stream is responsible for the guidance of actions. However, Studies are now showing that shape perception is relevant to visually guided action, such as reaching-to-grasp an object. In this article, I reviewed fundamental findings of two-visual system theory and suggested problems of visually guided action to consider what shape perception implies for the two visual systems. Questions raised highlight possible limitations of adopting a structural neuroanatomical approach to account for perception and action effects, and by extent related psychiatric conditions such as DCD. In conclusion, neurobiological approach converging to neuropsychiatry, while useful, would be limited if it focuses too much on anatomical distinction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. C. Yudofsky, Neuropsychiatry and the Future of Psychiatry and Neurology. Ameircan Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, pp. 1261-1264, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1261
  2. J. B. Martin, The integration of neurology, psychiatry, and neuroscience in the 21stcentury. Ameircan Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, pp. 695-704, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.695
  3. B. H. Price, R. D. Adams, and J. T. Coyle, Neurology and psychiatry: Closing the great divide. Neurology, Vol. 54, pp. 8-14, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.1.8
  4. K. S. Kendler, Toward a Philosophical Structure for Psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 162, pp. 433-440, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.433
  5. J. P. Wann, M. Mon-Williams, and K. Rushton, Postural control and co-ordination disorders: The swinging room revisited. Human Movement Science, Vol. 17, pp. 491-514, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(98)00011-6
  6. H. William, and M. Woollacott, Characteristics of neuromuscular responses underlying posture control in clumsy children. Motor Development; Research and Reviews, Vol. 1, pp. 8-23, 1997.
  7. B. C. M. Smits-Engelsman, A. S. Niemeijer, and G. P. Van Galen, Fine motor deficiencies in children diagnoses as DCD based on poor grapho-motor ability. Human Movement Science, Vol. 20, pp. 161-182, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00033-1
  8. M. Mon-Williams, J. P. Wann, and E. Pascal, Visual-proprioceptive mapping in developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Vol. 41, pp. 247-254, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162299000523
  9. H. Sigmundsson, Inter-modal matching and bi-manual co-ordination in children with hand-eye co-ordination problems. Nordisk Fysioterapi, Vol. 3, pp. 55-64, 1999.
  10. S. Parush, A. Yochman, D. Cohen, and E. Gershon, Relation of visual perception and visual-motor integration for clumsy children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 86, pp. 291-295, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.1.291
  11. A. J. Raynor, Strength, power, and coactivation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Vol. 43, pp. 676-684, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162201001220
  12. A. D. Milner, and M. A. Goodale, The visual brain in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  13. L. G. Ungerleider, and M. Mishkin, Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, and R. J. W. Mansfield(Eds.). Analysis of Visual Behavior (pp. 549-586). MIT Press Cambridge MA, 1982.
  14. M. A. Goodale, and A. D. Milner, Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, Vol. 15, pp. 20-25, 2002.
  15. J. Norman, Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral Brain Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 73-144, 2002.
  16. M. -T. Prenin, and A. Vighetto, Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, Vol. 111, pp. 643-674, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/111.3.643
  17. M. A. Goodale, J. P. Meenan, H. H. Bulthoff, D. A. Nicolle, K. J. Murphy, and C. I. Racicot, Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, Vol. 4, pp. 604-610, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00132-9
  18. L. S. Jakobson, Y. M. Archibald, D. P. Carey, and M. A. Goodale, A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 29, pp. 803-809, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(91)90073-H
  19. M. Jeannerod, J. Decety, and F. Michel, Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 32, pp. 369-380, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90084-1
  20. M. A. Goodale, A. D. Milner, L. S. Jakobson, and D. P. Carey, A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them, Nature, Vol. 349, pp. 154-156, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1038/349154a0
  21. Y. E. Cohen, and R. A. Andersen, A common reference frame fro movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 3, pp. 553-562, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn873
  22. L H. Snyder, A. P. Batista, and R. A. Andersen, Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature, Vol. 386, pp. 167-170, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1038/386167a0
  23. A. Murata, V. Gallese, M. Kaseda, H. Sakata, Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 75, pp. 2180-2186, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.2180
  24. J. D. Connolly, R. A. Andersen, and M. A. Goodale, fMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region'in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 153, pp. 140-145, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1587-1
  25. J. C. Culham, S. L. D. Dnackert, J. F. X. DeSouza, J. S. Gati, R. S. Menon, and M. A. Goodale, Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 153, pp. 180-189, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1591-5
  26. T. W. James, G. K. Humphrey, J. S. Gati, P. Servos, R. S. Menon, and M. A. Goodale, Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 40, pp. 1706-1714, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00017-9
  27. M. Bar, R. B. H. Tootell, D. L. Schacter, D. N. Greve, B. Fischl, J. D. Mendola, B. R. Rosen, and A. M. Dale, Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron, Vol. 29, pp. 529-535, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00224-0
  28. K. Grill-Spector, T. Kushnir, T. Hendler, R. Malach, The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 3, pp. 837-843, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1038/77754
  29. M. A. Goodale, L. S. Jakobson, and P. Servos, The visual pathways mediating perception and prehension. In A. M. Wing, P. Haggard, and J. R. Flanagan(Eds.), Hand and Brain: The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements (pp. 15-31). San Diego CA: Academic Press Inc, 1996.
  30. L. Pisella, H. Grea, C. Tilikete, A. Vighetto, M. Desmurget, G. Rode, D. Boisson, and Y. Rossetti, An 'automatic pilot'for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 3, pp. 729-736, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1038/76694
  31. A. D. Milner, H. C. Dijkerman, and D. P. Carey, Visuospatial processing in a pure case of visual-form agnosia. In N. Burgess, K. J. Jeffery, and J. O'keefe (Eds.), The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition (pp. 443-466). Oxford University Press, 1999.
  32. M. A. Goodale, L. S. Jakobson, and J. M. Keillor, Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movement. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 32, pp. 1159-1178, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90100-7
  33. M. A. Goodale, and A. D. Milner, Plans for action. Behavioral Brain Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 37-40, 2004.
  34. A. D. Milner, and M. A. Goodale, Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 46, pp. 774-785, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005
  35. H. van Doorn, J. van der Kamp, and G. J. P. Savelsbergh, Grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion: The contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 45, pp. 1939-1947, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.008
  36. D. P. Carey, M. Harvey, and A. D. Milner, Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 34, pp. 329-337, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00169-7
  37. E. A. Wickelgren, D. S. McConnell, and G. P. Bingham, Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: Forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 62, pp. 1051-1059, 2000. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212088
  38. G. P. Bingham, and M. Lind, Large perspective transformations are necessary and sufficient for accurate perception of metric shape. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 70, pp. 524-540, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.524
  39. Y. Lee, and G. P. Bingham, Large perspective changes (${\geq}45^{\circ}$) yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp, and it persists after the optic flow has stopped! Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 204, pp. 559-573, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2323-2
  40. M. Lind, Y. Lee, J. Mazanowski, G. K. Kountouriotis, and G. P.Bingham, Affine operations plus symmetry yield perception of metric shape with large perspective changes (${\geq}45^{\circ}$): Data and model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 40, pp. 83-93, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033245
  41. J. F. Norman, H. F. Norman, A. M. Clayton, J. Lianekhammy, and G. Zielke, The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 66, pp. 342-351, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194883
  42. A. Amedi, R. Malach, T. Hendler, S. Peled, and E. Zohary, Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 4, pp. 324-330, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1038/85201
  43. R. F. de Olivia, and J. P. Wann, Integration of dynamic information for visuomotor control in young adults with developmental coordination disorder. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 205, pp. 387-394, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2373-5
  44. M. Kashiwagi, S. Iwaki, Y. Narumi, H. Tamai, and S. Suzuki, Parietal dysfunction in developmental coordination disorder: A functional MRI study. Neuroreport, Vol. 20, pp. 1319-1324, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832f4d87
  45. J. G. Zwicker, C. Missiuna, S. R. Harris, and L. A. Boyd, Brain activation associated with motor skill practice in children with developmental coordination disorder: An fMRI study. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, Vol. 29, pp. 145-152, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2010.12.002
  46. C. Lefebvre, and G. Reid, Prediction in ball catching by children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp. 299-315, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.15.4.299
  47. M. A. Dar, R. A. Wani, and Y. H. Rather, An anti-thought about neurobiological approach in psychiatry. Journal of Pscyhiatry, Vol. 18, pp. 183, 2015. doi:10.4172/1994-8220.1000183
  48. J. Raese, The pernicious effect of mind/body dualism in psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 18, pp. 219, 2015. doi: 10.4172/1994-8220.1000219