Survey on Regulatory Status of Traditional and Complementary Medicine through Korean Embassies in 33 Countries

33개국 대한민국 재외공관을 통한 전통의학 및 보완대체의학 관련 제도 조사

  • Park, Yu Lee (The Global Center of Korean Medicine, the Association of Korean Medicine)
  • 박유리 (대한한의사협회 한의학글로벌센터)
  • Received : 2015.03.19
  • Accepted : 2015.04.11
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

Objective : This study aims to investigate legal and regulatory status of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) focusing on regulation on health practitioners and health practice in 33 countries. Method : 33 countries were selected based on several factors such as interest of Korean medical doctors, strategic importance, and distribution over the world. The questionnaire was distributed to Korean embassies in 33 countries in March 2014 through Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the answers from those countries were collected from April to September. 24 countries that provided sufficient information were included in the analysis. Results : 18 countries have law or regulation on T&CM. Only five countries regulate T&CM practitioners as medical personnel or health practitioner by law, and 12 countries have regulation on license or certificate. Half of 24 countries recognize license of T&CM practitioners issued abroad. There are nine countries that recognize T&CM practice as medical practice, and four of them regulate acupuncture as medical practice by western medical doctors or a few health practitioners recognized by the government. There are six countries that do not recognize T&CM practice as medical practice by law, but regulate it as practice that affect public health, and these countries have law or regulation on T&CM. Conclusion : As T&CM have great impact on public health, many countries have recently legislated law or regulation on T&CM. Rapid change in regulatory status of T&CM affects globalization of Korean medicine. Thus, development of timely strategies will be essential for it.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002-2005. Geneva: World Health Organization;2002.
  2. World Health Organization. Component 2. National policies on traditional medicine and complementary and alternative medicine. In: WHO Medicines Strategy 2004-2007. Geneva: World Health Organization;2004. pp. 45-56.
  3. World Health Organization. Strategic direction in selected priority areas. In: Continutiy and Change. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. pp. 21-23.
  4. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
  5. Wiesener S, Falkenberg T, Hegyi G, Hok J, Roberti di Sarsina P, Fonnebo V. Legal status and regulation of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe. Forsh Komplementmed. 2012;19 Suppl 2:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343125
  6. 윤강재 외. 중국의 중약자원관리 현황과 세계화 전략. 대외경제정책연구원;2013.
  7. 신현규 외. 세계 대체의학시장의 현황 및 향후 전망에 관한 연구. 한국한의학연구원;2007.
  8. 안인환 외. 한방의료산업의 해외시장 동향조사 및 진출방안. 한국보건산업진흥원;2003.
  9. 신현규 외. 한의약의 세계화 전략 방안 연구. 한국한의학연구원;2001.
  10. 임병묵. 미국의 보완대체의학 제도와 정책-면허제도와 의료보험급여를 중심으로. 대한예방한의학회지. 2010;14(1):137-149.
  11. 박완수 외. 한의약 해외거점 구축 지원 사업. 보건복지부;2014.
  12. 국가법령정보센터(http://law.go.kr/main.html)
  13. 선정원. 의료직업의 규제. 행정법 연구. 2010;26:347-390.
  14. Hunter D, Dal Poz MR, Kunjumen T. Boundaries of the health workforce: definition and classifications of health workers. In: Dal Poz MR, Gupta N, Quain E, Soucat A. Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health. Geneva: World Health Organization;2009. pp. 13-22.
  15. 류지태. 의료행위의 개념. 고려법학. 2002;39:61-88.