DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hedonic or Utilitarian : Why People Keep Using Social Network Services

  • Lee, Seyoon (Center for Work Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Jun-Gi (Center for Work Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Hyejung (Center for Work Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Oh, Jungsuk (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jungwoo (Center for Work Science, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2015.05.07
  • Accepted : 2015.06.24
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Social networking services (SNSs) serve to strengthen people's social relationships by providing ways for people to utilize such relationships especially like workplace. With the development of the internet worldwide, the number of SNS users is rapidly growing and a wider range of service types have become available. In this study, we designed a research model with a focus on what makes people use SNSs at workplace and how it is associated with changes in relationship quality and their intention to continue using the services and analyzed data collected for the research model. Theoretically, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation was invoked and measured, in terms of hedonic and utilitarian values, and satisfaction and trust were adopted as variables of relationship quality. Data were collected from Facebook users using workplace, and a partial least squares (PLS) analysis was made on 188 data points. The analysis results showed that two forms of motivation-hedonic and utilitarian-are separated from each other in their influence and that utilitarian value is more important than hedonic value, especially when it comes to users' satisfaction. In addition, the analysis found a weak relationship between satisfaction and trust in SNS environments; this was a little different from the results of previous studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Addis, M. and M.B. Holbrook, "On the Conceptual Link between Mass Customisation and Experiential Consumption : An Explosion of Subjectivity", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol.1, No.1, 2001, 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.53
  2. Babin, B.J., W.R. Darden, and M. Griffin, "Work and/or Fun : Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value", Journal of consumer research, Vol.20, No.4, 1994, 644-656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376
  3. Barclay, C. and K.M. Osei-Bryson, "Toward a More Practical Approach to Evaluating Programs : The Multi-Objective Realization Approach", Project Management Journal, Vol.40, No.4, 2009, 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20138
  4. Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding Information Systems Continuance : An Expectation-Confirmation Model", MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.3, 2001, 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  5. Boyd, D.M. and N.B. Ellison, "Social Network Sites : Definition, History, and Scholarship", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.13, No.1, 2007, 210-230.
  6. Caceres, R.C. and N.G. Paparoidamis, "Service Quality, Relationship Satisfaction, Trust, Commitment and Business-to-Business Loyalty", European Journal of Marketing, Vol.41, No.7/8, 2007, 836-867. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710752429
  7. Chea, S. and M.M. Luo, "Post-Adoption Behaviors of E-Service Customers : The Interplay of Cognition and Emotion", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 12, No.3, 2008, 29-56. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415120303
  8. Chin, W.W., "The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling, In Methodology for Business and Management", Modern methods for business research, Vol.295, No.2, 1998, 295-336.
  9. Crosby, L.A., K.A. Evans, and D. Cowles, "Relationship Quality in Services Selling : An Interpersonal Influence Perspective", Journal of marketing, Vol.54, 1990, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251817
  10. Cyr, D., "Modeling Web Site Design Across Cultures : Relationships to Trust, Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.24, No.4, 2008, 47-72. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240402
  11. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.22, No.14, 1992, 1111-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  12. Dholakia, U.M., R.P. Bagozzi, and L.K. Pearo, "A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities", International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.21, No.3, 2004, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
  13. Dwyer, F.R., P.H. Schurr, and S. Oh, "Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships", The Journal of Marketing, Vol.51, No.2, 1987, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251126
  14. Fogel, J. and E. Nehmad, "Internet Social Network Communities : Risk Taking, Trust, and Privacy Concerns", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.25, No.1, 2009, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006
  15. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error : Algebra and Statistics", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.3, 1981, 382-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
  16. Garbarino, E. and M.S. Johnson, "The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol.63, No.2, 1999, 70-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251946
  17. Gefen, D., D.W. Straub, and M.C. Boudreau, "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression : Guidelines for Research Practice", Communications of AIS, Vol.4, No.7, 2000, 1-79.
  18. Hair Jr, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black. Multivariate Data Analysis : With Readings, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995.
  19. Hargittai, E., "Whose Space? Differences among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.13, No.1, 2007, 276-297.
  20. Heijden, H.V.D., "User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No.4, 2004, 695-704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
  21. Hewstone, M., M. Rubin, and H. Willis, "Intergroup Bias", Annual review of psychology, Vol.53, No.1, 2002, 575-604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109
  22. Holbrook, M.B. and E.C. Hirschman, "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption : Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9, No.2, 1982, 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
  23. Jin, X.L., M.K.O. Lee, and C.M.K. Cheung, "Predicting Continuance in Online Communities : Model Development and Empirical Test", Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol.29, No.4, 2009, 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903398190
  24. Johnson, D. and K. Grayson, "Cognitive and Affective Trust in Service Relationships", Journal of Business research, Vol.58, No.4, 2005, 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00140-1
  25. Kazakeviciūtė, A. and J. Banyte, "The Relationship of Consumers 'Perceived Hedonic Value and Behavior", Engineering Economics, Vol.23, No.5, 2012, 532-540.
  26. Kim, C., W. Zhao, and K.H. Yang, "An Empirical Study on the Integrated Framework of E-Crm in Online Shopping : Evaluating the Relationships among Perceived Value, Satisfaction, and Trust Based on Customers' Perspectives", Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, Vol.6, No.3, 2008, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2008070101
  27. Lin, K.Y. and H.P. Lu, "Why People Use Social Networking Sites : An Empirical Study Integrating Network Externalities and Motivation Theory", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.27, No.3, 2011, 1152-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
  28. Lohmoller, J.B., Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 1989.
  29. Moliner, M.A., "Loyalty, Perceived Value and Relationship Quality in Healthcare Services", Journal of service management, Vol.20, No.1, 2009, 76-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230910936869
  30. Moliner, M.A., J. Sanchez, R.M. Rodriguez, and L. Callarisa, "Perceived Relationship Quality and Post-Purchase Perceived Value : An Integrative Framework", European Journal of Marketing, Vol.41, No.11/12, 2007, 1392-1422. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710821233
  31. Moorman, C., R. Deshpandcoq, and G. Zaltman, "Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships", The Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, No.1, 1993, 81-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252059
  32. Morgan, R.M. and S.D. Hunt, "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing", The Journal of marketing, Vol.58, No.3, 1994, 20-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308
  33. Pavlou, P.A. and D. Gefen, "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust", Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, No.1, 2004, 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015
  34. Pingdom, "Report : Social Network Demographics in 2012", Pingdom, http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/08/21/report-social-network-demographics-in-2012/.
  35. Radwanick, S. and A. Lipsman, "U.S. Digital Future in Focus 2012", http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations_and_Whitepapers/2012/2012_US_Digital_Future_in_Focus.
  36. Rempel, J.K., J.G. Holmes, and M.P. Zanna, "Trust in Close Relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.49, No.1, 1985, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
  37. Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci, "Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations : Classic Definitions and New Directions", Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol.25, No.1, 2000, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  38. Selnes, F., "Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Satisfaction in Buyer-Seller Relationships", European Journal of Marketing, Vol.32, No.3/4, 1998, 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569810204580
  39. Sharma, N. and P.G. Patterson, "The Impact of Communication Effectiveness and Service Quality on Relationship Commitment in Consumer, Professional Services", Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.13, No 2, 1999, 20.
  40. Sherry, J.F. Jr., "A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17, No.1, 1990, 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1086/208533
  41. Sledgianowski, D. and S. Kulviwat, "Using Social Network Sites : The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context", Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol.49, No.4, 2009, 74-83.
  42. Ulaga, W. and A. Eggert, "Relationship Value and Relationship Quality : Broadening the Nomological Network of Business-to-Business Relationships", European Journal of Marketing, Vol.40, No.3/4, 2006, 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610648075
  43. Wang, E.S.T., "Internet Usage Purposes and Gender Differences in the Effects of Perceived Utilitarian and Hedonic Value", Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol.13, No.2, 2010, 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0200
  44. Wang, S.C., E. Sy, and K. Fang, "The Post-Adoption Behavior of Online Knowledge Community : Decomposing Customer Value", The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol.51, No.2, 2010, 60-70.
  45. Wertenbroch, K. and R. Dhar, "Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.37, No.1, 2000, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
  46. Xu, C., S. Ryan, V. Prybutok, and C. Wen, "It Is Not for Fun : An Examination of Social Network Site Usage", Information and Management, Vol.49, No.5, 2012, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.05.001
  47. Yoon, S.J., "The Antecedents and Consequences of Trust in Online-Purchase Decisions", Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol.16, No.2, 2002, 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10008