DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the Implementation of the Bilateral Fisheries Order in the East China Sea after Establishing the China-Japan Fisheries Agreement

중·일 어업협정에 따른 양국 어업질서의 이행 실태 진단

  • Received : 2015.06.18
  • Accepted : 2015.08.12
  • Published : 2015.08.31

Abstract

This research assesses the implementation of the bilateral fisheries order of the China-Japan fisheries agreement. After establishment of UNCLOS, the China-Japanese fisheries agreement has played as a basis for the fisheries order in the East China Sea. The China-Japanese fisheries agreement intends that the fisheries industries in China and Japan can utilize the renewable natural resources in the East China Sea. As the EEZ of China overlaps with that of Japanese in the East China Sea, the two countries established the China-Japan Provisional Measure Zone and Middle Zone in the Sea. Even though the three coastal States (e.g. Korea, China, and Japan) in the East China Sea are involved in managing these zones, there has been little effort to coordinate each county's management. Additionally, the Taiwan-Japan fisheries agreement, which is for the area of N $27^{\circ}$, has made costal States to establish and implement united measures to conduct effective fisheries management. Regarding access to the joint fishing zone in EEZ, Chinese fisheries regulations have been enforced in the zone because the fishing capacity of China exceeds all of other countries, reducing the number of fishing licenses and catch quotas. It turned out that a nation that has authority over fisheries resources tends to establish specific conditions of fishing operations to maximize its national interest. In the China-Japan Provisional Measure Zone, Chinese and Japanese authorities have introduced united measures to manage fisheries resources. However, in the Middle Zone between China and Japan, there is no regulation on fishing; both countries' fishing vessels can have free access to the zone. Thus, it is recommended that one should introduce an international fisheries management regime for the Middle Zone. In this regard, Korea should play a leading role in establishing the international management regime because Korea has middle position in terms of geographical standpoint, the degree of dependence on commercial fishing, and its fishing capacity.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Jong-Hwa(2009). Analysis on Effect of Enforcement of Korea-China Fisheries Agreement, Maritime Law Review, 21(1), 1-25.
  2. Choi, Jong-Hwa(2012). International Fisheries Law Theory, Pukyong National University Press, 63-65.
  3. Fisheries Agency Policy Information Magazine (2015), Gyosei No Mado, Vol. 116, 2-4.
  4. Ji, Cheol-geun(1979). Peace Line, Beop Mun Company, 167-234.
  5. Jung, Bong-Kyu.Choi, Jung-Ho & Lim, Seok-Won (2014). A Study on the Role of Maritime Enforcement Organization As Response of Illegal Fishing, Journal of Fishier and Marin Educational Research 26(4), 771-775.
  6. Kataoka, Chikashi(2006). History of Fisheries Relationship among Japan, Korea, and China I, Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Nagasaki University, 87, 15-26.
  7. Kataoka, Chikashi.Nishida, Akari(2007). History of Fisheries Relationship among Japan, Korea, and China II, Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Nagasaki University, 88, 137-158.
  8. Kim, Dae-Young(1998). Reorganization of the International Fisheries Regime in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea, Nagasaki University, Ph.D. Dissertation, 38-46.
  9. Kim, Dae-Young(2014). A Study on the Transition of Korea-China Fisheries Agreement and Improvement of Fisheries-relation Issues between two Countries, The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, Vol. 45, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2014.45.3.019
  10. Report of the 15th Session of Japan-China Joint Fisheries Committee.(2014). Retrieved 12.18, 2014, from http://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/press/kokusai/141218.html
  11. Report of the 9th Session of Japan-China Fisheries Law Enforcement Working-level Meeting.(2014). Retrieved 12.18, 2014, from http://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/press/kokusai/141218.html
  12. The SuiSan-KeiZai Daily News.(2013, 4/12).
  13. Yomiuri Shimbun.(2013, 4/10).

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Study on Volatility Spillovers in the Stock Markets of Korea, China and Japan vol.28, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2016.28.1.127
  2. A Study on the Transition Situation of Korean-Japan Fisheries Agreement and Improvement Issue of Bilateral Fisheries Relations vol.47, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2016.47.1.031